Thus why I don't think it's egregious.theblueram wrote: ↑3 months agoThey just beat the #1 team in the country for the first time ever. So no court storm???? Cmon man.rjsuperfly66 wrote: ↑3 months agoIf it were my team, I would have preferred not to court storm. Creighton is a Top 15 team, spread was close, game was a blowout, and Creighton sees itself as a Final Four contender.ramster wrote: ↑3 months ago
I heard it’s the first time ever Creighton has beaten the #1 ranked team in the country. If that doesn’t justify a good ol’ court storming don’t know what does.
But for me never saw a court storming I didn’t like. The more the merrier.
Just curious what RJsuperfly thinks since it’s his conference and his earlier comment here.
To me that upends the ranking of the opponent.
Now do I think it's egregious? No.
I may not agree with it but I get why they did it.
I just like storms to mean something, and to many storms takes away from the impact of the truly great ones.
But you are talking to someone who thinks we should only see a handful of storms every year.
I think a lot of places have manufacturing reasons where they haven't historically been.