Yes lol
'22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Forum rules
If you start a recruit thread and don't set up a profile, make a blank post first so a profile can be added later.
Place whatever you were going to post in the second post.
If you start a recruit thread and don't set up a profile, make a blank post first so a profile can be added later.
Place whatever you were going to post in the second post.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10081
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 5917
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 7797
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Rhode Island
- x 6579
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4853
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 3160
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
I know we played in this last year - but since Wright's father runs the event....
Bleed Keaney Blue!
”I'm not coming there to be in the top 3 of the Atlantic 10. I'm coming to win the damn thing!”
”I'm not coming there to be in the top 3 of the Atlantic 10. I'm coming to win the damn thing!”
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 7797
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Rhode Island
- x 6579
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Can only play in MTEs once every four years, Wright won’t be on the team the next time we can play in it.steviep123 wrote: ↑1 year ago I know we played in this last year - but since Wright's father runs the event....
Go Rhody
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16877
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9036
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Yes, we lost to K-State (Always dad's school). I wonder if this is where the recruitment of Always started.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 15111
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5371
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Yeah I was wondering that too , maybe Arch talked to his dad there ??Billyboy78 wrote: ↑1 year agoYes, we lost to K-State (Always dad's school). I wonder if this is where the recruitment of Always started.
-
- Tom Garrick
- Posts: 1074
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 741
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Now that we have a player with this kind of name, we need to find a better announcer to do it justice. I'm cringing as I envision the various ways in which Yorke will butcher this kids name.
"Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our minds!" - Marcus Garvey
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 12604
- Joined: 8 years ago
- x 6808
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16877
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9036
-
- Tom Garrick
- Posts: 1472
- Joined: 10 years ago
- x 1006
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
My only question is if he can defend. He might be the best shooter we have had on the team in years.
-
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 2207
- Joined: 7 years ago
- x 1361
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
I'm excited about this kid. He may be special.
-
- ARD
- Posts: 618
- Joined: 1 year ago
- x 431
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
He's well spoken.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 15111
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5371
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Nice interview, I like how he said he wanted to play for a coach who was a point guard , let’s hope he turns out great
-
- Tom Garrick
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: 6 years ago
- x 878
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 15111
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5371
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Love this kids attitude, he’s just the type of player I want to root for
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 7797
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Rhode Island
- x 6579
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Tremendous statement here.DeanDome88 wrote: ↑1 year ago My only question is if he can defend. He might be the best shooter we have had on the team in years.
Kid hasn’t played a second of D1 basketball and he’s already potentially the best shooter we’ve had in years?
Come on.
Go Rhody
-
- ARD
- Posts: 716
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 512
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Normally I agree with this - however virtually ANY player we sign could be the best shooter we've had in years.Rhody15 wrote: ↑1 year agoTremendous statement here.DeanDome88 wrote: ↑1 year ago My only question is if he can defend. He might be the best shooter we have had on the team in years.
Kid hasn’t played a second of D1 basketball and he’s already potentially the best shooter we’ve had in years?
Come on.
The bar is not high.
-
- Jeff Kent
- Posts: 171
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 68
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
If nothing else he is a good FT that can play PG. Will a plus at end of close games As Kortight doesn’t appear to be the guy u want with the ball when the other team is fouling.
-
- Jeff Kent
- Posts: 189
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 191
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 3897
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 1728
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
I admit I'm really interested to see this kid take the court in a Rhody uniform. Every bit as much as House, Montgomery, Brown, or Kortright.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10081
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 5917
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
His highlight reel is as good as or better than anyone we have signed. He's very polished, which isn't surprising since his dad was a pro.
I'm having a hard time understanding why he wasn't more sought after. Makes me wonder if the competition he played at the JUCO level wasn't very good, because he pretty much dominated.
He's athletic, he has a nice looking shot, above average quick release, he keeps his head up, finds the open man, plays with poise like...what exactly is he lacking? He needs to put on weight for sure and he said that's his first priority. He doesn't look like the most athletic guy I've ever seen, but he doesn't look slow at all.
Always, House and Zek have the best film that I've seen. They look ready and appear to have the most upside.
-
- Tom Garrick
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: 6 years ago
- x 920
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Jersey said it earlier in the thread he played against some very good JUCO schools including Indian Hills (#1 JUCO team in the country which they beat) there are some duds they did play against but he did get his fair test of good competitionPeterRamTime wrote: ↑1 year agoHis highlight reel is as good as or better than anyone we have signed. He's very polished, which isn't surprising since his dad was a pro.
I'm having a hard time understanding why he wasn't more sought after. Makes me wonder if the competition he played at the JUCO level wasn't very good, because he pretty much dominated.
He's athletic, he has a nice looking shot, above average quick release, he keeps his head up, finds the open man, plays with poise like...what exactly is he lacking? He needs to put on weight for sure and he said that's his first priority. He doesn't look like the most athletic guy I've ever seen, but he doesn't look slow at all.
Always, House and Zek have the best film that I've seen. They look ready and appear to have the most upside.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16877
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9036
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Decent size too, listed at 6'3".
-
- Tom Garrick
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: 6 years ago
- x 878
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4842
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 6487
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Agreed.. I remember I texted a few Rhody fans saying how talented he looked on offense while watching a handful of his games. I had and still have doubts because, literally, no one was offering him. He can shoot and score, but what I was really impressed with was his IQ. When his team needed to calm down or run a set play, he was their go-to. A good guard knows when to score or feed the hot hand. He did that really well in the games I watched.PeterRamTime wrote: ↑1 year agoHis highlight reel is as good as or better than anyone we have signed. He's very polished, which isn't surprising since his dad was a pro.
I'm having a hard time understanding why he wasn't more sought after. Makes me wonder if the competition he played at the JUCO level wasn't very good, because he pretty much dominated.
He's athletic, he has a nice looking shot, above average quick release, he keeps his head up, finds the open man, plays with poise like...what exactly is he lacking? He needs to put on weight for sure and he said that's his first priority. He doesn't look like the most athletic guy I've ever seen, but he doesn't look slow at all.
Always, House and Zek have the best film that I've seen. They look ready and appear to have the most upside.
House and Luis will start but Always should have a nice role immediately.
ATTITUDE IS EVERYTHING
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 3897
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 1728
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Did you watch sbrand's interview with the guy that covers Quinnipiac?
According to him, Always and Luis don't even play the same position. Luis was the sometimes starter at the 3 last year, they had a dedicated PG and SG who both started full time. Sometimes Luis was their 6th man. It's all in that interview.
According to him, Always and Luis don't even play the same position. Luis was the sometimes starter at the 3 last year, they had a dedicated PG and SG who both started full time. Sometimes Luis was their 6th man. It's all in that interview.
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4842
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 6487
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Yup Desi Jones and Balanc are both very good players. Kortright played the 1-3 for them last year in the games I watched. I’m sure Archie will enjoy having a versatile player like Kortright.jcru wrote: ↑1 year ago Did you watch sbrand's interview with the guy that covers Quinnipiac?
According to him, Always and Luis don't even play the same position. Luis was the sometimes starter at the 3 last year, they had a dedicated PG and SG who both started full time. Sometimes Luis was their 6th man. It's all in that interview.
ATTITUDE IS EVERYTHING
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 3897
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 1728
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
sounds like the kind of player who is great at backing up the 1-3
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4842
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 6487
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Unfortunately we don’t have a backcourt like Quinnipiac had last year so I don’t see how Kortright isn’t a starter for us.
ATTITUDE IS EVERYTHING
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 3897
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 1728
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
I'm old enough to remember, almost 24 years ago, people on these very message boards saying that Lamar Odom was going to be our starting point guard, to the point where if you said, er, I don't know about that, they would start a massive argument with you, including "you don't know anything about basketball". I was young then, in my 20's, I remember Rod telling me to basically let it go.
Needless to say, Lamar, despite playing point guard years earlier before his 7 inch growth spurt, wasn't our starting point guard that year.
So, weirder things have been proposed than someone who played small forward last year for his previous team, being suggested as the starting point guard this year on this team. We do have two players who basically do nothing but PG on this team already however.
Needless to say, Lamar, despite playing point guard years earlier before his 7 inch growth spurt, wasn't our starting point guard that year.
So, weirder things have been proposed than someone who played small forward last year for his previous team, being suggested as the starting point guard this year on this team. We do have two players who basically do nothing but PG on this team already however.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16877
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9036
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
If our backcourt can't be as good as what Quinnipiac had last year, what else is there to say?....QUINNIPIAC!!!....geesh.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑1 year agoUnfortunately we don’t have a backcourt like Quinnipiac had last year so I don’t see how Kortright isn’t a starter for us.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10081
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 5917
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Well when he arrived here we didn't have a backcourt like QU.Billyboy78 wrote: ↑1 year agoIf our backcourt can't be as good as what Quinnipiac had last year, what else is there to say?....QUINNIPIAC!!!....geesh.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑1 year agoUnfortunately we don’t have a backcourt like Quinnipiac had last year so I don’t see how Kortright isn’t a starter for us.
But I mean now it's a better backcourt. We have an older Luis, Jaden House who was better than any of them then Always, Zek, Weston, Cam and Dubsky.
At the end of the day we'll be plenty better than QU's backcourt lol
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 7797
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Rhode Island
- x 6579
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Can't put Always, Estevez and Dubsky into that group and say they're better than a proven, productive D1 backcourt like QU's.PeterRamTime wrote: ↑1 year agoWell when he arrived here we didn't have a backcourt like QU.Billyboy78 wrote: ↑1 year agoIf our backcourt can't be as good as what Quinnipiac had last year, what else is there to say?....QUINNIPIAC!!!....geesh.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑1 year ago
Unfortunately we don’t have a backcourt like Quinnipiac had last year so I don’t see how Kortright isn’t a starter for us.
But I mean now it's a better backcourt. We have an older Luis, Jaden House who was better than any of them then Always, Zek, Weston, Cam and Dubsky.
At the end of the day we'll be plenty better than QU's backcourt lol
Go Rhody
-
- ARD
- Posts: 692
- Joined: 2 years ago
- x 565
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Always Wright never wrong
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10081
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 5917
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
My thought into it isRhody15 wrote: ↑1 year agoCan't put Always, Estevez and Dubsky into that group and say they're better than a proven, productive D1 backcourt like QU's.PeterRamTime wrote: ↑1 year agoWell when he arrived here we didn't have a backcourt like QU.Billyboy78 wrote: ↑1 year ago
If our backcourt can't be as good as what Quinnipiac had last year, what else is there to say?....QUINNIPIAC!!!....geesh.
But I mean now it's a better backcourt. We have an older Luis, Jaden House who was better than any of them then Always, Zek, Weston, Cam and Dubsky.
At the end of the day we'll be plenty better than QU's backcourt lol
We will have a more experienced and likely better version of Luis Kortight
House is better than Balanc
Then we just need more pridiction out of Weston, Zek, Always, Cam and Dubsky than QU got out of one Dezi Jones to say we have a better group of guards.
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4842
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 6487
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Yes I thought Quinnipiac had a good backcourt last year. I’d love to hear your thoughts on Dezi Jones and Balanc? I personally think they would be good A10 players and would be near the top of our rotation next year. That doesn’t mean guys like Cam Always and Connor can’t become better players down the road but right now Jones and Balanc are better.Billyboy78 wrote: ↑1 year agoIf our backcourt can't be as good as what Quinnipiac had last year, what else is there to say?....QUINNIPIAC!!!....geesh.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑1 year agoUnfortunately we don’t have a backcourt like Quinnipiac had last year so I don’t see how Kortright isn’t a starter for us.
ATTITUDE IS EVERYTHING
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4842
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 6487
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
When I made my comment I personally wasn’t adding Weston and Zek as I think they play more of a hybrid wing/4 this year since we likely go small. But yes Zek and Weston are strong players. Especially Zek.PeterRamTime wrote: ↑1 year agoMy thought into it isRhody15 wrote: ↑1 year agoCan't put Always, Estevez and Dubsky into that group and say they're better than a proven, productive D1 backcourt like QU's.PeterRamTime wrote: ↑1 year ago
Well when he arrived here we didn't have a backcourt like QU.
But I mean now it's a better backcourt. We have an older Luis, Jaden House who was better than any of them then Always, Zek, Weston, Cam and Dubsky.
At the end of the day we'll be plenty better than QU's backcourt lol
We will have a more experienced and likely better version of Luis Kortight
House is better than Balanc
Then we just need more pridiction out of Weston, Zek, Always, Cam and Dubsky than QU got out of one Dezi Jones to say we have a better group of guards.
I looked at it this way.
Dezi, Balanc, Kortright
Vs
Kortright, House, Always, Cam, Connor
Right now. I would take Quinnipiacs backcourt over ours. That could change as I think Cam will be great eventually and Always seems to have a lot of talent. We’ll see
ATTITUDE IS EVERYTHING
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16877
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9036
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
I'll admit that other than the game we played them I never watched Quinnipiac. But Quiinipiac should NEVER have a backcourt, frontcourt, ANY court better than URI. It's QUINNIPIAC!!!.....and it's not hockey.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑1 year agoYes I thought Quinnipiac had a good backcourt last year. I’d love to hear your thoughts on Dezi Jones and Balanc? I personally think they would be good A10 players and would be near the top of our rotation next year. That doesn’t mean guys like Cam Always and Connor can’t become better players down the road but right now Jones and Balanc are better.Billyboy78 wrote: ↑1 year agoIf our backcourt can't be as good as what Quinnipiac had last year, what else is there to say?....QUINNIPIAC!!!....geesh.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑1 year ago
Unfortunately we don’t have a backcourt like Quinnipiac had last year so I don’t see how Kortright isn’t a starter for us.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10081
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 5917
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
And we have a two game losing streak to them in basketballBillyboy78 wrote: ↑1 year agoI'll admit that other than the game we played them I never watched Quinnipiac. But Quiinipiac should NEVER have a backcourt, frontcourt, ANY court better than URI. It's QUINNIPIAC!!!.....and it's not hockey.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑1 year agoYes I thought Quinnipiac had a good backcourt last year. I’d love to hear your thoughts on Dezi Jones and Balanc? I personally think they would be good A10 players and would be near the top of our rotation next year. That doesn’t mean guys like Cam Always and Connor can’t become better players down the road but right now Jones and Balanc are better.Billyboy78 wrote: ↑1 year ago
If our backcourt can't be as good as what Quinnipiac had last year, what else is there to say?....QUINNIPIAC!!!....geesh.
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4842
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 6487
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Well let’s hope some our incoming guards are the real deal.PeterRamTime wrote: ↑1 year agoAnd we have a two game losing streak to them in basketballBillyboy78 wrote: ↑1 year agoI'll admit that other than the game we played them I never watched Quinnipiac. But Quiinipiac should NEVER have a backcourt, frontcourt, ANY court better than URI. It's QUINNIPIAC!!!.....and it's not hockey.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑1 year ago
Yes I thought Quinnipiac had a good backcourt last year. I’d love to hear your thoughts on Dezi Jones and Balanc? I personally think they would be good A10 players and would be near the top of our rotation next year. That doesn’t mean guys like Cam Always and Connor can’t become better players down the road but right now Jones and Balanc are better.
ATTITUDE IS EVERYTHING
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10081
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 5917
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Well they can start by making wide open shots.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑1 year agoWell let’s hope some our incoming guards are the real deal.PeterRamTime wrote: ↑1 year agoAnd we have a two game losing streak to them in basketballBillyboy78 wrote: ↑1 year ago
I'll admit that other than the game we played them I never watched Quinnipiac. But Quiinipiac should NEVER have a backcourt, frontcourt, ANY court better than URI. It's QUINNIPIAC!!!.....and it's not hockey.
Hell improve from like 360th to 200th in FG% and we make a massive jump.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16877
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9036
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Ways is here.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 15111
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5371
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Good for him , seems like a fun kid to root for
-
- Tom Garrick
- Posts: 1173
- Joined: 5 years ago
- x 1509
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Loved the tempo that Ways played at the Assumption game, fast and smart. He will be fun to watch as the season develops.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16877
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9036
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
He sure can get the ball up the court very quickly. He's going to be a very good player here. His main weakness is his outside shot. He has a very bad release as he kind of pushes the ball. But I know he's working hard to improve. His brother is a better shooter. I hope he comes here too.LoveThoseRams wrote: ↑7 months ago Loved the tempo that Ways played at the Assumption game, fast and smart. He will be fun to watch as the season develops.
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8908
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 10020
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
His shot is unorthodox for sure, but I believe he shot it at 40% from 3 in Juco. I don’t expect that here but even if he settles in mid 30% it will be wholesale better than what we had last year. At this point most guys don’t change their mechanics even tho I agree with you his could use some work.Billyboy78 wrote: ↑7 months agoHe sure can get the ball up the court very quickly. He's going to be a very good player here. His main weakness is his outside shot. He has a very bad release as he kind of pushes the ball. But I know he's working hard to improve. His brother is a better shooter. I hope he comes here too.LoveThoseRams wrote: ↑7 months ago Loved the tempo that Ways played at the Assumption game, fast and smart. He will be fun to watch as the season develops.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16877
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9036
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Yeah, I just found a PROJO article that says he shot them at 43.4% last year. I guess I don't care if he shoots them underhanded if he's making them at that clip.bigappleram wrote: ↑7 months agoHis shot is unorthodox for sure, but I believe he shot it at 40% from 3 in Juco. I don’t expect that here but even if he settles in mid 30% it will be wholesale better than what we had last year. At this point most guys don’t change their mechanics even tho I agree with you his could use some work.Billyboy78 wrote: ↑7 months agoHe sure can get the ball up the court very quickly. He's going to be a very good player here. His main weakness is his outside shot. He has a very bad release as he kind of pushes the ball. But I know he's working hard to improve. His brother is a better shooter. I hope he comes here too.LoveThoseRams wrote: ↑7 months ago Loved the tempo that Ways played at the Assumption game, fast and smart. He will be fun to watch as the season develops.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 15111
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5371
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
Ways looks like that classic point guard very quick good passer , reminds me of LaMelo Ball without the jumper
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 7797
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Rhode Island
- x 6579
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
LaMelo isn’t known for shooting.
You’re probably just saying this because they have similar hair lol
Love when there’s one good game and we start comparing our players to NBA talent, happens every year.
Go Rhody
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4227
- Joined: 2 years ago
- x 2092
Re: '22 PG/SG Always Wright (NEO A&M JC ---> URI)
I get where you are coming from, Reef. I like the player and I favor classic point guards. I think the O will be in good hands with Ways and Hammond (when he gets here).
Not to speak for you but I often see similarities in styles of play and in certain basketball characteristics (handle, shot release, go to move, etc) in different players college to college, college to pro, etc. It doesn’t mean I expect the same production, efficiency, ceiling, etc.