The David Cox Era
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16459
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5289
Re: The David Cox Era
Knowing Dooley, I would say no to Rice. They have probably already discussed possible assistants.
700K is close to what I thought he would get, to start.
Am sure there are quite a few incentives attached.
700K is close to what I thought he would get, to start.
Am sure there are quite a few incentives attached.
-
- Tyson Wheeler
- Posts: 7488
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Rhode Island
- x 4041
-
- Lamar Odom
- Posts: 327
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 137
Re: The David Cox Era
Time for Mrs. Cox to go shopping.NYGFan_Section208 wrote:His contract is a five-year deal for $700,000 per year.Shaolin Swat wrote:http://www.gorhody.com/sports/m-baskbl/ ... 0404ld5s09
Press Release says its a 5-year deal for Cox
When will they be moving to EG?
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 3984
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Kingston
- x 2421
Re: The David Cox Era
More of this!
Turn him loose coach!
We're gonna run the picket fence at "em.....now boys don't get caught watchin' the paint dry!
-
- Tyson Wheeler
- Posts: 7437
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 3942
Re: The David Cox Era
Dan Hurley’s buyout and avoiding the bonus to Cox cover two of those years. Relax.RhowdyRam02 wrote:Well there you go. Poor job insulating us from the risk of this hire. It better work.Shaolin Swat wrote:http://www.gorhody.com/sports/m-baskbl/ ... 0404ld5s09
Press Release says its a 5-year deal for Cox
“We will be good when we are good.”
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10405
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 6667
Re: The David Cox Era
That money should be going toward the necessary improvements in travel and the practice facility.Rhody83 wrote:Dan Hurley’s buyout and avoiding the bonus to Cox cover two of those years. Relax.RhowdyRam02 wrote:Well there you go. Poor job insulating us from the risk of this hire. It better work.Shaolin Swat wrote:http://www.gorhody.com/sports/m-baskbl/ ... 0404ld5s09
Press Release says its a 5-year deal for Cox
Take down the Robert Carothers banner and fix the concession stand lines
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16459
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5289
Re: The David Cox Era
I wouldn't concern myself with any reference to Tomlin.....good grief.
And there will likely be a buyout too, for anyone who is worried about that. It's what is done nowadays.
And there will likely be a buyout too, for anyone who is worried about that. It's what is done nowadays.
-
- Cuttino Mobley
- Posts: 1750
- Joined: 9 years ago
- Location: Las Vegas
- x 2181
Re: The David Cox Era
considering they found the cash for both of those as well as $2 mill a year for Hurley, I'd say your chicken little fears are unfounded.RhowdyRam02 wrote:That money should be going toward the necessary improvements in travel and the practice facility.Rhody83 wrote:Dan Hurley’s buyout and avoiding the bonus to Cox cover two of those years. Relax.RhowdyRam02 wrote:
Well there you go. Poor job insulating us from the risk of this hire. It better work.
---
He was a snake oil salesman...just like the rest of em
---
He was a snake oil salesman...just like the rest of em
---
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 13857
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 11440
Re: The David Cox Era
I would say it will be barring a catastrophe anyways.RhowdyRam02 wrote:That money should be going toward the necessary improvements in travel and the practice facility.Rhody83 wrote:Dan Hurley’s buyout and avoiding the bonus to Cox cover two of those years. Relax.RhowdyRam02 wrote:
Well there you go. Poor job insulating us from the risk of this hire. It better work.
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
-
- Tyson Wheeler
- Posts: 7437
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 3942
Re: The David Cox Era
They also have $850,000 per year for the next 5 years from their tournament games.RhowdyRam02 wrote:That money should be going toward the necessary improvements in travel and the practice facility.Rhody83 wrote:Dan Hurley’s buyout and avoiding the bonus to Cox cover two of those years. Relax.RhowdyRam02 wrote:
Well there you go. Poor job insulating us from the risk of this hire. It better work.
Would you have been ok with Dooley for five years?
What did you expect - 4 years is a minimum. You are complaining over $700,000.
The coaches want five years so they can recruit players and tell them they will be there.
Relax and Think Big! We Do
Last edited by Rhody83 6 years ago, edited 1 time in total.
“We will be good when we are good.”
-
- Tyson Wheeler
- Posts: 7437
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 3942
Re: The David Cox Era
Press conference Friday at 11:00 am.
Just like 78 predicted.
Just like 78 predicted.
“We will be good when we are good.”
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 13857
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 11440
Re: The David Cox Era
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
-
- Jimmy Baron
- Posts: 380
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 288
Re: The David Cox Era
They both went there and actually know each other well.gorhody wrote:Tomlin and Cox both went to William and Mary... maybe thats why he made the comparison? Grasping at straws here.
-
- ARD
- Posts: 633
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 333
Re: The David Cox Era
New coach check, recruiting class + current players likely staying check, now fill that last scholarship with a grad transfer and let's get some new uniforms that don't have horns on the shorts looking like a Fannie pack
Clapton is God
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 12096
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Wakefield, RI
- x 4792
Re: The David Cox Era
Support Coach Miller & Rhody Basketball! Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8914
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 10028
Re: The David Cox Era
Now that this is out two things i have heard recently that are worth repeating...
1.) Direct from current players on our team the word was Cox is the glue, multiple guys came here to play for him as much as Dan.
2.) Despite the above, there is still an expectation of 1-2 defections. Whether its recruits or current players I am not sure, but have heard that we will not 100% retain all talent even with Cox hire.
1.) Direct from current players on our team the word was Cox is the glue, multiple guys came here to play for him as much as Dan.
2.) Despite the above, there is still an expectation of 1-2 defections. Whether its recruits or current players I am not sure, but have heard that we will not 100% retain all talent even with Cox hire.
-
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 2284
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 1264
Re: The David Cox Era
Believe it or not there are quite a few guys in the coaching profession that have done worse and survived, just not reported. Many coaches may be very compassionate, but not necessarily proper in everything they do. I am not defending any type of bad behavior by any coach, but just stating facts. Its not CYO hereRamIt! wrote:Hopefully he's taken some anger management classes since.giovanni wrote:No idea if a Mike Rice would ever be considered as an assistant, but despite his past issues the man is a very good basketball mind with experience.
-
- Tyson Wheeler
- Posts: 7437
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 3942
Re: The David Cox Era
“We will be good when we are good.”
-
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 3442
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 1471
Re: The David Cox Era
That seems strange -- You would think that if people were to defect, they would have done so already (similar to someone like Akinjo at UCONN who did not wait to see who was hired before decommiting). If someone happened to be already unhappy with the program to that point that continuity with Cox would not change that, what would change with someone Dooley for example? "Oh by the way, you can play 40 minutes per game because we have 3 scholarship players"?bigappleram wrote:
2.) Despite the above, there is still an expectation of 1-2 defections. Whether its recruits or current players I am not sure, but have heard that we will not 100% retain all talent even with Cox hire.
-
- Cuttino Mobley
- Posts: 1780
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 358
Re: The David Cox Era
Time to get this show on the road. Spring signing is a week away!
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10405
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 6667
Re: The David Cox Era
Considering that Thorr hasn't committed to that being true for coaches other than Hurley when asked the question directly, I'd say the concern is very much founded.Da_Process_Survivor wrote:considering they found the cash for both of those as well as $2 mill a year for Hurley, I'd say your chicken little fears are unfounded.RhowdyRam02 wrote:That money should be going toward the necessary improvements in travel and the practice facility.Rhody83 wrote:
Dan Hurley’s buyout and avoiding the bonus to Cox cover two of those years. Relax.
Take down the Robert Carothers banner and fix the concession stand lines
-
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 2284
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 1264
Re: The David Cox Era
bigappleram wrote:Now that this is out two things i have heard recently that are worth repeating...
1.) Direct from current players on our team the word was Cox is the glue, multiple guys came here to play for him as much as Dan.
2.) Despite the above, there is still an expectation of 1-2 defections. Whether its recruits or current players I am not sure, but have heard that we will not 100% retain all talent even with Cox hire.
Hope no one leaves at all, but especially UCONN. I could never blame a kid who grows a feeling for a coach, not so much a school who changes his mind. Recruiting is basically about relationships. Facilities to a degree , certainly other intangibles. Hopefully Danny isn't getting in anyones ear, but I doubt that is true. IMO he is or has never been a moralistic guy like the GOD he is portrayed as here. Actually the total opposite.
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Boston
- x 2706
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10405
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 6667
Re: The David Cox Era
I laid out how the contract should have been structured where we could have minimized our risk and Cox could have recruited players and told them he'd be here.Rhody83 wrote:They also have $850,000 per year for the next 5 years from their tournament games.RhowdyRam02 wrote:That money should be going toward the necessary improvements in travel and the practice facility.Rhody83 wrote:
Dan Hurley’s buyout and avoiding the bonus to Cox cover two of those years. Relax.
Would you have been ok with Dooley for five years?
What did you expect - 4 years is a minimum. You are complaining over $700,000.
The coaches want five years so they can recruit players and tell them they will be there.
Relax and Think Big! We Do
And I'd say we're arguing over $1.4 million. If Cox can't get this team into the tournament in 3 years he should be let go. We hired him because he brought a loaded roster as a hiring chip. Well he needs to win, win big, and win fast. No excuses.
Take down the Robert Carothers banner and fix the concession stand lines
-
- Jimmy Baron
- Posts: 387
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 482
Re: The David Cox Era
Yeah I'm not following this either. Not saying there's no truth to it, I'm just saying it seems odd for the reasons you mentioned. If players were planning on leaving, they would have already left. What's the benefit of waiting until the new head coach is announced?rjsuperfly66 wrote:That seems strange -- You would think that if people were to defect, they would have done so already (similar to someone like Akinjo at UCONN who did not wait to see who was hired before decommiting). If someone happened to be already unhappy with the program to that point that continuity with Cox would not change that, what would change with someone Dooley for example? "Oh by the way, you can play 40 minutes per game because we have 3 scholarship players"?bigappleram wrote:
2.) Despite the above, there is still an expectation of 1-2 defections. Whether its recruits or current players I am not sure, but have heard that we will not 100% retain all talent even with Cox hire.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16459
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5289
Re: The David Cox Era
If we lose a recruit I'm guessing it's Adams....haven't heard a peep from him.
We also might lose a current player to transfer such as Mike L or T......
We also might lose a current player to transfer such as Mike L or T......
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4917
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 2513
Re: The David Cox Era
I presume Tate, Harris and Martin will be coming. I really hope Adams will too. Weren’t Fatts and Dowtin both Cox recruits?bigappleram wrote:Now that this is out two things i have heard recently that are worth repeating...
1.) Direct from current players on our team the word was Cox is the glue, multiple guys came here to play for him as much as Dan.
2.) Despite the above, there is still an expectation of 1-2 defections. Whether its recruits or current players I am not sure, but have heard that we will not 100% retain all talent even with Cox hire.
Slava Ukraini!
-
- Marc Upshaw
- Posts: 99
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 21
Re: The David Cox Era
I'm in for a $20.19 donation after Thorr makes it official. I am actually going to save money because I was set to donate $200.19 if they went with a Pitino type hire! Win win for me & Rhody today!!!Rhody83 wrote:Making another donation to the basketball program once this is officially announced by Thorr to thank him for doing the right thing.
For those who made the symbolic $20.18 contribution last month, maybe you can make a $20.19 contribtion after the press conference to show we support David Cox. Just a thought.
-
- Tyson Wheeler
- Posts: 7437
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 3942
Re: The David Cox Era
What is your source? To not know if the supposed defections are recruits or existing players seems sketchy.bigappleram wrote:Now that this is out two things i have heard recently that are worth repeating...
1.) Direct from current players on our team the word was Cox is the glue, multiple guys came here to play for him as much as Dan.
2.) Despite the above, there is still an expectation of 1-2 defections. Whether its recruits or current players I am not sure, but have heard that we will not 100% retain all talent even with Cox hire.
If a player was going to ask out of their NLOI or transfer, it would be in their best interest to do it immediately (as soon as Dan left). Schools have limited scholarships and have been out making offers and getting commitments the last two weeks. Since you are saying they were leaving no matter who replaced Dan, why would they wait to announce that and hurt themselves.
It doesn’t make sense. The only players who are in the “talent” category that have not come out publicly in support of Cox are Fatts and Adams. If you are talking about bench players, that is a whole different story.
“We will be good when we are good.”
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 13857
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 11440
Re: The David Cox Era
Whoever it is, doubtful it will be this guy:bigappleram wrote:2.) Despite the above, there is still an expectation of 1-2 defections. Whether its recruits or current players I am not sure, but have heard that we will not 100% retain all talent even with Cox hire.
or this guy
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 12096
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Wakefield, RI
- x 4792
Re: The David Cox Era
It's already official, and send in the $200.GansettRam74 wrote:I'm in for a $20.19 donation after Thorr makes it official. I am actually going to save money because I was set to donate $200.19 if they went with a Pitino type hire! Win win for me & Rhody today!!!
Support Coach Miller & Rhody Basketball! Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 12620
- Joined: 8 years ago
- x 6817
Re: The David Cox Era
New thread? "Importance ranking of players that might defect"Rhody74 wrote:I presume Tate, Harris and Martin will be coming. I really hope Adams will too. Weren’t Fatts and Dowtin both Cox recruits?bigappleram wrote:Now that this is out two things i have heard recently that are worth repeating...
1.) Direct from current players on our team the word was Cox is the glue, multiple guys came here to play for him as much as Dan.
2.) Despite the above, there is still an expectation of 1-2 defections. Whether its recruits or current players I am not sure, but have heard that we will not 100% retain all talent even with Cox hire.
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8914
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 10028
Re: The David Cox Era
Agree with the sentiment that it would be weird at this point to lose any of the Core 3 - Cyril, Jeff and Fatts. Or the 3 recruits who were loud about wanting to play for Cox. But that still leaves a bunch of other guys. I don't reveal sources, or well ya know those sources dry up, but I almost never post intel unless its from trusted source (see Baron firing, Cyril having a hernia, etc). As I said this person did not infer whether it was a recruit or current player.
-
- Tyson Wheeler
- Posts: 7437
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 3942
Re: The David Cox Era
Put the $180 aside and donate it when they make the Tournament.GansettRam74 wrote:I'm in for a $20.19 donation after Thorr makes it official. I am actually going to save money because I was set to donate $200.19 if they went with a Pitino type hire! Win win for me & Rhody today!!!Rhody83 wrote:Making another donation to the basketball program once this is officially announced by Thorr to thank him for doing the right thing.
For those who made the symbolic $20.18 contribution last month, maybe you can make a $20.19 contribtion after the press conference to show we support David Cox. Just a thought.
“We will be good when we are good.”
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 9961
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 7775
Re: The David Cox Era
Isn't really 5 years kind of the minimum you'd want a coach to have though in order to make that promise to recruits? It covers the current year and then the 4 years that the recruit would be on the team.RhowdyRam02 wrote: I laid out how the contract should have been structured where we could have minimized our risk and Cox could have recruited players and told them he'd be here.
And I'd say we're arguing over $1.4 million. If Cox can't get this team into the tournament in 3 years he should be let go. We hired him because he brought a loaded roster as a hiring chip. Well he needs to win, win big, and win fast. No excuses.
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 1563
Re: The David Cox Era
I think any of the guys that didn't play this year and rode the bench are candidates. Then Adams.
He doesn't seem SO keen on the Keaney Blue.
I wouldn't mind and would even prefer if everyone stayed. I like guys to stay and get better. Graduate. Enjoy their time here.
WHO ARE THE ASSISTANTS!
He doesn't seem SO keen on the Keaney Blue.
I wouldn't mind and would even prefer if everyone stayed. I like guys to stay and get better. Graduate. Enjoy their time here.
WHO ARE THE ASSISTANTS!
I want to change my name to BlockIslandFerry
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10094
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 5921
Re: The David Cox Era
Seems doubtful it's a recruit.bigappleram wrote:Agree with the sentiment that it would be weird at this point to lose any of the Core 3 - Cyril, Jeff and Fatts. Or the 3 recruits who were loud about wanting to play for Cox. But that still leaves a bunch of other guys. I don't reveal sources, or well ya know those sources dry up, but I almost never post intel unless its from trusted source (see Baron firing, Cyril having a hernia, etc). As I said this person did not infer whether it was a recruit or current player.
He had a hand in Adams, Martin and Harris. Yet Tate has pledged allegiance with Martin and Harris.
If Adams was recruited by him then it would be odd for him to back out now.
You would think it would be Tertsea, but Cox recruited him.
Hard to guess who.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16888
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9051
Re: The David Cox Era
I wouldn't think Christion would be one either after sitting out this year. He would lose a year of eligibility, I believe. Plus he 'liked' the tweets from the recruits about Coach Cox.
-
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 2755
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 2623
Re: The David Cox Era
The apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Mike Sr., who coached Duquesne in the early 80s, was a lunatic in the sidelines. He made the 2013 version of Dan Hurley look like Gandhi.RamIt! wrote:Hopefully he's taken some anger management classes since.giovanni wrote:No idea if a Mike Rice would ever be considered as an assistant, but despite his past issues the man is a very good basketball mind with experience.
Proudly supplying the Internet with online wisecracks, impertinent comments and loathing of all things mental hospital since 1996.
-
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 3259
- Joined: 10 years ago
- Location: Narragansett
- x 2526
Re: The David Cox Era
Rhodymob05 wrote:COX "your COACH in the digital age"
HAHAHA! That is priceless. Thanks for choosing Cox (Communications).
-
- Tom Garrick
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 440
Re: The David Cox Era
I'm kind of nervous about Fatts. The fact him and Hurley were really close plus he has three years of eligibility left definitely worries me.Rhody83 wrote:What is your source? To not know if the supposed defections are recruits or existing players seems sketchy.bigappleram wrote:Now that this is out two things i have heard recently that are worth repeating...
1.) Direct from current players on our team the word was Cox is the glue, multiple guys came here to play for him as much as Dan.
2.) Despite the above, there is still an expectation of 1-2 defections. Whether its recruits or current players I am not sure, but have heard that we will not 100% retain all talent even with Cox hire.
If a player was going to ask out of their NLOI or transfer, it would be in their best interest to do it immediately (as soon as Dan left). Schools have limited scholarships and have been out making offers and getting commitments the last two weeks. Since you are saying they were leaving no matter who replaced Dan, why would they wait to announce that and hurt themselves.
It doesn’t make sense. The only players who are in the “talent” category that have not come out publicly in support of Cox are Fatts and Adams. If you are talking about bench players, that is a whole different story.
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 7538
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 15434
Re: The David Cox Era
...we didn't have the resources to do so until now.RhowdyRam02 wrote:Considering that Thorr hasn't committed to that being true for coaches other than Hurley when asked the question directly, I'd say the concern is very much founded.Da_Process_Survivor wrote:considering they found the cash for both of those as well as $2 mill a year for Hurley, I'd say your chicken little fears are unfounded.RhowdyRam02 wrote:
That money should be going toward the necessary improvements in travel and the practice facility.
That's like someone talking about buying a house at 30 but someone else saying they're full of shit because they didn't buy a house when they were 23.
We didn't have the money to buy out Jim Baron - where the hell were we going to find practice facility money? We had to cut swimming, diving, and gymnastics as sports - but you think we had money for charter flights?
If you say you’re a Rhody fan, I know you are my brother. For you have suffered as I have suffered.
Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
Give to Rhody's NIL
Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
Give to Rhody's NIL
-
- Tyson Wheeler
- Posts: 7437
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 3942
Re: The David Cox Era
Fair enough on source disclosure. But you said “talent” and then just excluded 6 out of 8 talented players. Thompson has already tweeted his support after Cox was named (see tweet above). That only leaves Adams who was recruited by Cox. You also said 1-2 players. That insinuates two have been mentioned to your source but there is only one left. Most of all it doesn’t make sense for a top player to delay their announcement (unless they are going to UCONN). I don’t think Hurley would take a player now that Cox has been named HC.bigappleram wrote:Agree with the sentiment that it would be weird at this point to lose any of the Core 3 - Cyril, Jeff and Fatts. Or the 3 recruits who were loud about wanting to play for Cox. But that still leaves a bunch of other guys. I don't reveal sources, or well ya know those sources dry up, but I almost never post intel unless its from trusted source (see Baron firing, Cyril having a hernia, etc). As I said this person did not infer whether it was a recruit or current player.
Last edited by Rhody83 6 years ago, edited 1 time in total.
“We will be good when we are good.”
-
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 3259
- Joined: 10 years ago
- Location: Narragansett
- x 2526
Re: The David Cox Era
Rhody83 wrote:Press conference Friday at 11:00 am.
Just like 78 predicted.
I anticipate this would be open to the public, correct?
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4917
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 2513
Re: The David Cox Era
Thompson isn’t in a position to transfer and lose another year plus he seems happy in his latest tweet. So if anyone leaves it would probably be from the two Mikes, Preston or Akele.
Slava Ukraini!
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16888
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9051
Re: The David Cox Era
That was my thought too. But I'm not sure Dan would do that to David after campaigning for David to get the job.josephski wrote:I'm kind of nervous about Fatts. The fact him and Hurley were really close plus he has three years of eligibility left definitely worries me.Rhody83 wrote:What is your source? To not know if the supposed defections are recruits or existing players seems sketchy.bigappleram wrote:Now that this is out two things i have heard recently that are worth repeating...
1.) Direct from current players on our team the word was Cox is the glue, multiple guys came here to play for him as much as Dan.
2.) Despite the above, there is still an expectation of 1-2 defections. Whether its recruits or current players I am not sure, but have heard that we will not 100% retain all talent even with Cox hire.
If a player was going to ask out of their NLOI or transfer, it would be in their best interest to do it immediately (as soon as Dan left). Schools have limited scholarships and have been out making offers and getting commitments the last two weeks. Since you are saying they were leaving no matter who replaced Dan, why would they wait to announce that and hurt themselves.
It doesn’t make sense. The only players who are in the “talent” category that have not come out publicly in support of Cox are Fatts and Adams. If you are talking about bench players, that is a whole different story.
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 7538
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 15434
Re: The David Cox Era
Or Langevine considering he jumped in on the video with Tate and watched him play this weekend. They were talking about how they were boys and how they couldn't wait to play together.TruePoint wrote:Whoever it is, doubtful it will be this guy:bigappleram wrote:2.) Despite the above, there is still an expectation of 1-2 defections. Whether its recruits or current players I am not sure, but have heard that we will not 100% retain all talent even with Cox hire.
or this guy
If you say you’re a Rhody fan, I know you are my brother. For you have suffered as I have suffered.
Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
Give to Rhody's NIL
Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
Give to Rhody's NIL
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4853
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 3160
Re: The David Cox Era
Will this be streamed?Taylor Swift wrote:Rhody83 wrote:Press conference Friday at 11:00 am.
Just like 78 predicted.
I anticipate this would be open to the public, correct?
Bleed Keaney Blue!
”I'm not coming there to be in the top 3 of the Atlantic 10. I'm coming to win the damn thing!”
”I'm not coming there to be in the top 3 of the Atlantic 10. I'm coming to win the damn thing!”
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16459
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5289
Re: The David Cox Era
It's not Cyril either....he's with Tate all the way.....
Fatts not sure........we can't afford to lose him and Adams.....
Fatts not sure........we can't afford to lose him and Adams.....
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 13857
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 11440
Re: The David Cox Era
That is 80% of a starting lineup right thereBlue Man wrote:Or Langevine considering he jumped in on the video with Tate and watched him play this weekend. They were talking about how they were boys and how they couldn't wait to play together.TruePoint wrote:Whoever it is, doubtful it will be this guy:bigappleram wrote:2.) Despite the above, there is still an expectation of 1-2 defections. Whether its recruits or current players I am not sure, but have heard that we will not 100% retain all talent even with Cox hire.
or this guy
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011