A-10. 3-5 WhoWantsNext?!!??
-
- ARD
- Posts: 522
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 128
A-10. 3-5 WhoWantsNext?!!??
Great job Dayton. No wonder Ohio state won't play you in the regular season.
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5575
Re: A-10. 1-0
Very exciting game. Last second shot wins it 60-59. Four lead changes in the last minute.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 13857
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 11440
Re: A-10. 1-0
I'm happy for the A10, but the referees handed that game to Dayton. I would be very upset if I were an OSU fan. Officials should not be deciding games in late March.
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
-
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 439
Re: A-10. 1-0
how do you figure TP? thought the refs were good, that was a clearly a foul on the 3
NOT IN OUR HOUSE
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 3501
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 1784
Re: A-10. 1-0
TP, are you serious ? It all evens out in the end......you must be training to become part of the national media and coaches who believe the A-10 got too many teams in and that the conference is not that good.....
....let's keep hoping the A-10 proves all these nay-sayers wrong....
....let's keep hoping the A-10 proves all these nay-sayers wrong....
F*ck Alacki, DarthFriar, DirtyBeanFriar94, xCoachK, Boxworth, Friar Faithful, bicycleicycle, Matt_Keough, Patrick Norton, the Rosato brothers, and especially Benjamin Lord !
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 13857
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 11440
Re: A-10. 1-0
Not at all. I was rooting for Dayton, but I thought there were four clear calls that were wrong down the stretch: flagrant foul on Craft, no-call on over-the-back offensive rebound by Dayton on missed three pointer, foul called when Dayton player fell down at the top of the key trying to beat OSU defender off the dribble, and no-call on last drive by Craft to win the game.Ramulous wrote:TP, are you serious ? It all evens out in the end......you must be training to become part of the national media and coaches who believe the A-10 got too many teams in and that the conference is not that good.....
....let's keep hoping the A-10 proves all these nay-sayers wrong....
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10536
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 7654
Re: A-10. 1-0
That's ridiculous tp.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 13857
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 11440
Re: A-10. 1-0
?theblueram wrote:That's ridiculous tp.
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
-
- Art Stephenson
- Posts: 844
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 551
Re: A-10. 1-0
Wow, that Dayton team looks nothing like the team that visited the Ryan Center earlier in the season.
They look like a tough out and will give Syracuse a run.
They look like a tough out and will give Syracuse a run.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10536
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 7654
Re: A-10. 1-0
Each of the 4 plays you mention I agreed with the call on the court. Craft was at least intentional. Tv people agreed. The foul at the top of the key was the correct call. Osu was leaning in and caused the fall. Craft was not fouled on the final play. In fact Dayton was clearly playing the last minute with no intention to foul.
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 1563
Re: A-10. 1-0
If anything I thought they were giving craft the foul on all his and1's.
Good kid, great ambassador. Not a guy that improved his game over the course of his career.
Good kid, great ambassador. Not a guy that improved his game over the course of his career.
I want to change my name to BlockIslandFerry
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 13857
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 11440
Re: A-10. 1-0
TV people always agree with the call on the court. That doesn't mean anything to me. I thought in all four cases that the call was clearly wrong. Not just questionable, but clearly incorrect. And like I said, I was rooting for Dayton and am glad they won.theblueram wrote:Each of the 4 plays you mention I agreed with the call on the court. Craft was at least intentional. Tv people agreed. The foul at the top of the key was the correct call. Osu was leaning in and caused the fall. Craft was not fouled on the final play. In fact Dayton was clearly playing the last minute with no intention to foul.
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
-
- Abdul Fox
- Posts: 42
- Joined: 11 years ago
Re: A-10. 1-0
Not sure what the beef is with the officiating. It was fine. If you want critique every whistle blown in the tournament, start another thread. Newsflash...there will be some controversial calls in the NCAA tourney. But in the OSU/Dayton, it was job well done.
-
- Cuttino Mobley
- Posts: 2067
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 1420
Re: A-10. 1-0
Wow TP - did you lose money in this one? That was clearly intentional. Not flagrant, but intentional when you wrap a guy up like that. Craft only had to hack his shooting hand to avoid the intentional
-
- Abdul Fox
- Posts: 42
- Joined: 11 years ago
Re: A-10. 1-0
Also, not sure how you can say "clearly incorrect." You can make a case (a poor one in my opinion) that the calls were wrong. But clearly incorrect?? C'mon, that's plain ridiculous. .
-
- ARD
- Posts: 558
- Joined: 10 years ago
- x 58
Re: A-10. 1-0
TP, you can't seriously think the flagrant on Craft was wrong. He didn't make a play on the ball at all. He wrapped his arm around the guy. You will see that called a flagrant every time when you make it that obvious. No if's, and's, or but's about it. Always called. Also, fouls are committed on drives at the buzzer every time. They will NEVER call it. Just like pass interferences on hail mary's at the end of a football game. You said don't let the refs decide the game. Calling a foul on that last play, would be the refs deciding the fate of the game. The others were questionable, I'll give you that. Either way, great first game of the tournament!
-
- Jimmy Baron
- Posts: 469
- Joined: 11 years ago
-
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 439
Re: A-10. 1-0
TP, that's a flagrant foul, its a foul with no play on the ball on a fast break lay up. You talk about how you don't want the refs deciding the game then complain they don't call an iffy foul in the final seconds. Craft went into 3 guys straight up and threw up a prayer that almost went in. The only one that was a bad call was when the dayton guy fell dribbling but it didn't decide the game
NOT IN OUR HOUSE
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8908
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 10020
Re: A-10. 1-0
Aaron Craft is one of the most overrated players in the history of college hoops. Right up there with Dickie V's butt boy Steve Wojo from Duke. The recruiter at OSU that decided they should take Craft instead of Trey Burke should be fired. Craft is a nice player, would welcome him in Rhody Blue, but he is nowhere near the player he is hyped up to be.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 24363
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9175
Re: A-10. 1-0
agree, that was a very good no-call.Andrew wrote:The last shot by Craft was a textbook definition of a right no-call.
Dayton won the game, they outplayed Ohio State.
Referee good calls, bad calls and no calls all even out.
I once knew a Veteran High School Referee who also Ref'd some college games too. When players, fans or coaches complained about his calls he always said to them "Look, I only make two kinds of calls - those I see and those I don't see".
-
- Lamar Odom
- Posts: 300
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 55
Re: A-10. 1-0
That last play with Craft was clearly a no call. He just barreled in and was hoping for contact. One Dayton player was clearly trying to get out of his way.
-
- Cuttino Mobley
- Posts: 1834
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 1051
Re: A-10. 1-0
That ref cost me a billion dollars!!!
Roll that around on your tongue for a while.
The FIRST FREAKIN GAME!!!
Oh well.
Roll that around on your tongue for a while.
The FIRST FREAKIN GAME!!!
Oh well.
-
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 3108
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 8
Re: A-10. 1-0
Hey, TP: I didn't see it, really. I was at work.
Sounds like it was a helluva game!
Sounds like it was a helluva game!
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4916
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 2513
Re: A-10. 1-0
Cincinnati loses to Harvard, leaving Dayton as the sole Ohio team left in the tournament. Happy for the Flyers ....
Slava Ukraini!
-
- Cuttino Mobley
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Quahog
- x 1140
Re: A-10. 1-0
bressler3south wrote:Hey, TP: I didn't see it, really. I was at work.
Sounds like it was a helluva game!
Same here i was at work and missed it. Seriously do any of you guys work?!?!?
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4916
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 2513
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 13857
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 11440
Re: A-10. 1-0
You are obviously fouling "intentionally" when you are fouling to stop a guy from taking a layup on a fast break. The intent was pretty clearly to wrap him up on the ground before he got into the air and it became a dangerous play. A flagrant foul is such punitive call that it should only be made when the intent is to injure the opponent, not just because the foul was committed "intentionally." That is a ridiculous interpretation of the rule.
As far as the other calls, I can't fathom how the Dayton guy falling down on his own is a foul but not the guy who gets hit in the air trying to get a shot off. The ratio of contact on those plays was about 100:1. The amount of time left on the clock shouldn't impact the call.
As far as the other calls, I can't fathom how the Dayton guy falling down on his own is a foul but not the guy who gets hit in the air trying to get a shot off. The ratio of contact on those plays was about 100:1. The amount of time left on the clock shouldn't impact the call.
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 13857
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 11440
Re: A-10. 1-0
They stream the games online. Speaking of which my stream has been lousy today. Anyone else??STC wrote:bressler3south wrote:Hey, TP: I didn't see it, really. I was at work.
Sounds like it was a helluva game!
Same here i was at work and missed it. Seriously do any of you guys work?!?!?
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
-
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 3108
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 8
Re: A-10. 1-0
I work with and in front of others….The only stream I'm getting is laughing too much while reading this thread and peeing my pants!!!!!!!!!!!!!TruePoint wrote:They stream the games online. Speaking of which my stream has been lousy today. Anyone else??STC wrote:bressler3south wrote:Hey, TP: I didn't see it, really. I was at work.
Sounds like it was a helluva game!
Same here i was at work and missed it. Seriously do any of you guys work?!?!?
Gotta love the Crimson defeating FORMER BIG-LEAST MEMBER ZINZINNATI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The look on Cronin's face was priceless. Pale..paler…palest!!!!!!!!!!
-
- ARD
- Posts: 609
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 697
Re: A-10. 1-0
That "ridiculous interpretation of the rule" is the rule and it's called 100 out of 100 times. You hook the body and don't go for the ball, they call it.TruePoint wrote:You are obviously fouling "intentionally" when you are fouling to stop a guy from taking a layup on a fast break. The intent was pretty clearly to wrap him up on the ground before he got into the air and it became a dangerous play. A flagrant foul is such punitive call that it should only be made when the intent is to injure the opponent, not just because the foul was committed "intentionally." That is a ridiculous interpretation of the rule.
As far as the other calls, I can't fathom how the Dayton guy falling down on his own is a foul but not the guy who gets hit in the air trying to get a shot off. The ratio of contact on those plays was about 100:1. The amount of time left on the clock shouldn't impact the call.
-
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 2983
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 447
Re: A-10. 1-0
I thought the refs were pretty fair. Only having played 1 yr. of junior high BB, I can't debate an intentional from a flagrant foul. I always thought that a flagrant is called once the player has passed the defender. Could be wrong.
It felt like we won today. I'm really cheering for our teams this year, even UMass., (I know what I said in an earlier thread).
I guess our Daytonflyer fan has better things to do today than post here. But, if he/she is reading, CONGRATULATIONS!!! Keep it up.
If we can get at least 3-4 of our teams advancing, I'll feel satisfied. Of course, all 6 advancing would be unreal.
I jokingly picked Harvard to go all the way. Could it happen?
It felt like we won today. I'm really cheering for our teams this year, even UMass., (I know what I said in an earlier thread).
I guess our Daytonflyer fan has better things to do today than post here. But, if he/she is reading, CONGRATULATIONS!!! Keep it up.
If we can get at least 3-4 of our teams advancing, I'll feel satisfied. Of course, all 6 advancing would be unreal.
I jokingly picked Harvard to go all the way. Could it happen?
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9037
Re: A-10. 1-0
If a player makes no attempt on the ball, and grabs the offensive player by the body, it's an automatic flagrant 1. That is exactly what happened.
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8908
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 10020
Re: A-10. 1-0
They called a similar foul in the Iowa game last night. The old intentional foul is now a Flagrant 1, and URI05 is right they call it all the time.
On a sep note, could the disparity in SAT scores be any greater than in a game between Harvard and the Univ of Cincinnati?
On a sep note, could the disparity in SAT scores be any greater than in a game between Harvard and the Univ of Cincinnati?
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4459
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Houston, TX (via Charlestown, RI)
- x 3106
Re: A-10. 1-0
I'm with TP somewhat - I thought the flagrant, while correct, was a bit iffy, and it doesn't make sense with the end of the game result. If you're going to call the flagrant by the letter of the law, then why wasn't Craft's final drive also a foul? On replay, it looked like he got bumped down the court, and while one Dayton player was backing up, it looked like two others might have made contact. Either call the flagrant and end of game foul, or just call it a personal foul instead of a flagrant and a no-foul at the end.
One other foul called was also clearly wrong - With about a minute left, the Dayton guard basically just tripped over his own feet. Karma though, he missed both.
One other foul called was also clearly wrong - With about a minute left, the Dayton guard basically just tripped over his own feet. Karma though, he missed both.
-
- Cuttino Mobley
- Posts: 1529
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 449
Re: A-10. 1-0
Truepoint - You can't be serious? I couldn't disagree with that statement any more. Maybe you just watched a different game then the rest of the country.
-
- Tom Garrick
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Maynard, MA
- x 711
Re: A-10. 1-0
So, I asked a former D1 asst coach who would like to remain nameless here in Vegas. He said it was more intentional than flagrant, but either should have been called. He made the point that Craft should not have played that way to begin with. Don't give the ref the opportunity to call it, slap at the ball with all your power.
'No Mercy.'
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 13857
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 11440
Re: A-10. 1-0
Some do-gooder refs may call it, but it is hardly 100 out of 100. If the NCAA feels that call was made correctly then the rule should be changed. The guy made the smart and safe play and got penalized for it. Anyway, it doesn't matter. The calls are the calls and I'm glad Dayton won the game. Good for them and good for the A10. I'm just saying that if I were a OSU fan (and I couldn't be less of an OSU fan) I'd be a little aggravated with the way the game was officiated down the stretch.URI_05 wrote:That "ridiculous interpretation of the rule" is the rule and it's called 100 out of 100 times. You hook the body and don't go for the ball, they call it.TruePoint wrote:You are obviously fouling "intentionally" when you are fouling to stop a guy from taking a layup on a fast break. The intent was pretty clearly to wrap him up on the ground before he got into the air and it became a dangerous play. A flagrant foul is such punitive call that it should only be made when the intent is to injure the opponent, not just because the foul was committed "intentionally." That is a ridiculous interpretation of the rule.
As far as the other calls, I can't fathom how the Dayton guy falling down on his own is a foul but not the guy who gets hit in the air trying to get a shot off. The ratio of contact on those plays was about 100:1. The amount of time left on the clock shouldn't impact the call.
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 24363
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9175
Re: A-10. 1-0
Agree that it was stupid to make the call something the ref could call anyway. Call desrved to be called by the ref simply on stupidity.
Glad Dayton won, it was not due to the refs at all.
Give Dayton the credit due, the refs did not cost Ohio State the game.
Glad Dayton won, it was not due to the refs at all.
Give Dayton the credit due, the refs did not cost Ohio State the game.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9037
Re: A-10. 1-0
There is no such thing as an intentional foul anymore. It's a flagrant 1 or a flagrant 2.Sweep The Leg wrote:So, I asked a former D1 asst coach who would like to remain nameless here in Vegas. He said it was more intentional than flagrant, but either should have been called. He made the point that Craft should not have played that way to begin with. Don't give the ref the opportunity to call it, slap at the ball with all your power.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 24363
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9175
Re: A-10. 1-0
St Joseph's beating UCONN by 9 with 4 minutes left in the first half.
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8908
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 10020
Re: A-10. 1-0
The A10 winning is like troll repellent.....Keep It Up Boys!!!!!
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 12096
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Wakefield, RI
- x 4792
Re: A-10. 1-0
Joe's unfortunately couldn't extend their lead to double digits and instead gave up a late 3 to finish the half up just 5.
Support Coach Miller & Rhody Basketball! Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 24363
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9175
Re: A-10. 1-0
Allie LaForce just interviewed Phil Martelli just before he went to the locker room at halftime. Talk about beauty and the beast
-
- Cuttino Mobley
- Posts: 1751
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Parkland, FL
- x 1103
Re: A-10. 1-0
ramster wrote:Allie LaForce just interviewed Phil Martelli just before he went to the locker room at halftime. Talk about beauty and the beast
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9037
Re: A-10. 1-0
St. Louis doesn't look very good so far, losing by 11.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 12096
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Wakefield, RI
- x 4792
Re: A-10. 1-0
Joe's blew it... FIRE MARTELLI!! PhilMustGo.com
But SLU clawed back and tied the game for OT where they lead by 3.
But SLU clawed back and tied the game for OT where they lead by 3.
Support Coach Miller & Rhody Basketball! Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
-
- Marc Upshaw
- Posts: 85
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 26
Re: A-10. 1-0
Wow, St. Louis!
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 24363
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9175
Re: A-10. 1-0
Wow, great win by St Louis. Coach K must be pissed since he mouthed off about the A10 getting 6 bids. He was high on NC State and SLU beats them. A10 really needed this win tonight.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 13857
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 11440
Re: A-10. 1-0
The A10 played three of the best games today - maybe THE three best.
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16459
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5288
Re: A-10. 1-0
A10 2-1 on opening day. Not bad.
Joes should have won, StLouis probably should have lost. It evened out.
I see another 2-1 day tomorrow, with UMass the only loser.
If we get 4-2, or even 5-1, Coach K can officially shut the fuck up.
Joes should have won, StLouis probably should have lost. It evened out.
I see another 2-1 day tomorrow, with UMass the only loser.
If we get 4-2, or even 5-1, Coach K can officially shut the fuck up.