Don't get too worked up over this.
Social accounts interaction, really!
Marketing/advertising tool for Skull Sparks
I am sure the BE isn't very worried at #24.
Don't get too worked up over this.
It's only going to become a bigger deal as we move forward.Jersey77 wrote: ↑1 year agoDon't get too worked up over this.
Social accounts interaction, really!
Marketing/advertising tool for Skull Sparks
I am sure the BE isn't very worried at #24.
Unfurled should be more concerned about their team underperforming last season and losing in the quarterfinals of the A10T.
"lol...wut?"Jersey77 wrote: ↑1 year agoUnfurled should be more concerned about their team underperforming last season and losing in the quarterfinals of the A10T.
Also having their star players transferring out for their last season of eligibility.
On top of that having to replace their entire roster for 22-23.
But yeah, pay so much attention to social media interaction and its effect on the conference rather than the Bonnies finishing a disappointing 4th last season.
I understand in this day and age that this may have a place and does help in certain aspects.
But as far as recruiting, it still comes down to the staff and the program.
And as I said before, the conference's success depends on the performance of its teams and the school's investment in the program.
This is one of those cultural shifts that may be tougher to understand if you didn’t grow up with it. But today, it’s a big deal.Jersey77 wrote: ↑1 year agoUnfurled should be more concerned about their team underperforming last season and losing in the quarterfinals of the A10T.
Also having their star players transferring out for their last season of eligibility.
On top of that having to replace their entire roster for 22-23.
But yeah, pay so much attention to social media interaction and its effect on the conference rather than the Bonnies finishing a disappointing 4th last season.
I understand in this day and age that this may have a place and does help in certain aspects.
But as far as recruiting, it still comes down to the staff and the program.
And as I said before, the conference's success depends on the performance of its teams and the school's investment in the program.
Yeah Blue Man, probably a generation thing.Blue Man wrote: ↑1 year agoThis is one of those cultural shifts that may be tougher to understand if you didn’t grow up with it. But today, it’s a big deal.Jersey77 wrote: ↑1 year agoUnfurled should be more concerned about their team underperforming last season and losing in the quarterfinals of the A10T.
Also having their star players transferring out for their last season of eligibility.
On top of that having to replace their entire roster for 22-23.
But yeah, pay so much attention to social media interaction and its effect on the conference rather than the Bonnies finishing a disappointing 4th last season.
I understand in this day and age that this may have a place and does help in certain aspects.
But as far as recruiting, it still comes down to the staff and the program.
And as I said before, the conference's success depends on the performance of its teams and the school's investment in the program.
Literally Livvy Dunne is going to make $2M+ over her collegiate career because of social media.
Yea, being good matters - but especially at a school like this (and this conference), on-court success is fleeting. Staying in the conversation today matters potentially more than the on-court success when it comes to recruiting and scheduling games.
Christ I mean people convince themselves that playing FGCU is a good get based on the publicity generated by a couple upsets almost a decade ago.
Social media interaction matters. It’s a revenue stream, it helps sell your program to other teams and prospective students, it’s literally how the world works.
Poopooing something like this is forgivable if you’re a fan who graduated long before the internet, but if you’re in a leadership position in your conference and changing these metrics isn’t a top priority, you need to be fired.
The A10 will take in 4 weaker programs from the geographical areas that they are losing programs. That's what a core group of A10 Lifer schools do.Jdrums#3 wrote: ↑1 year ago ...
If 4 BE teams leave for the Big 12 for basketball only, will the A10 be proactive: does this create an opportunity for the A10 to possibly merge with the remaining 7 BE programs but, not with every A10 team involved, by potentially creating a 20 team basketball only conf?
Or, is it more likely the A10 sits back and does nothing while the BE potentially poaches from the A10 once again?
...
No, not team accounts I don't believe. But any official Atlantic 10 account, which includes A10MBB, A10WBB, etc.RhodyKyle wrote: ↑1 year ago I didn't dig into this so my post may be way off-base and ignorant. Is this only measuring the official conference account interactions or does it create some sort of composite score of all the individual member schools' interactions on their accounts? Like does me interacting with a rhodymbb tweet factor in or only a10mbb?
It’s possible.
Agreed. The day, time, and CBS network do provide a lot of eyeballs for the A-10.bigappleram wrote: ↑1 year ago For all the lack of moves from the A10 leadership over the years their biggest boon was getting our championship game on CBS a few hours before selection Sunday. That’s a golden placement.
I'm wondering if the fact that the BE is on FS1 (championship on Fox) versus when the whole tourney was on ESPN has an effect.RF1 wrote: ↑1 year agoAgreed. The day, time, and CBS network do provide a lot of eyeballs for the A-10.bigappleram wrote: ↑1 year ago For all the lack of moves from the A10 leadership over the years their biggest boon was getting our championship game on CBS a few hours before selection Sunday. That’s a golden placement.
It’s never been a destination league even when we were multi bid.SmartyBarrett wrote: ↑1 year ago Yeah we know where the blame lies. My overall point is that the A-10 is looking less and less like a destination league for coaches until they turn things back around.
For sure, I meant for like low-major coaches. NEC, America East, etc.bigappleram wrote: ↑1 year agoIt’s never been a destination league even when we were multi bid.SmartyBarrett wrote: ↑1 year ago Yeah we know where the blame lies. My overall point is that the A-10 is looking less and less like a destination league for coaches until they turn things back around.
Honestly - with the bounces of the ball. Those top teams weren't as far off as we think - just like we were on the wrong side of a lot of bounces in a ton of our losses.
RF1,RF1 wrote: ↑1 year ago A-10 basketball battling downward trend of teams in NCAA Tournament
https://www.stltoday.com/sports/college ... 73151.html
ramster wrote: ↑1 year agoRF1,RF1 wrote: ↑1 year ago A-10 basketball battling downward trend of teams in NCAA Tournament
https://www.stltoday.com/sports/college ... 73151.html
Do you have the facts about Dan Hurley's contract buy out agreement? I thought I read somewhere recently that it was about $1.5 million or so if paid off one way and roughly $1 million if paid off quickly? Do you recall?
Also with Cox he had a contract maybe his last year or last two years that had some type of buyout if he didn't get the HC job if Hurley left. Do you know the details of that which was aimed at trying to keep Cox at URI as HC if Hurley were to leave.
Good story, RF1. Thanks for posting.RF1 wrote: ↑1 year ago A-10 basketball battling downward trend of teams in NCAA Tournament
https://www.stltoday.com/sports/college ... 73151.html
I am okay with her for now. Let’s see how she navigates the conference through these new waters for the next two years. If the conference continues to struggle next year and the year after, I think a change would be justified.
I would like to see a change.
Plus, did I hear A10 Basketball is going to FLO Sports? If true, that is a fireable offenseRhowdyRam02 wrote: ↑1 year agoI would like to see a change.
1. Men's basketball is the only sport that really matters in our conference and it's been steadily going downhill for a while now.
2. She's been commissioner for 15 years. At a certain point it's just time for someone with new ideas in charge.
If 1 was the opposite and we were rising as a conference than I'd say keep her on, she's bringing something to the table. Where 1 is the state of affairs, it's clear her leadership is stagnant at best, if not subpar
Was an April fools joketheblueram wrote: ↑1 year agoPlus, did I hear A10 Basketball is going to FLO Sports? If true, that is a fireable offenseRhowdyRam02 wrote: ↑1 year agoI would like to see a change.
1. Men's basketball is the only sport that really matters in our conference and it's been steadily going downhill for a while now.
2. She's been commissioner for 15 years. At a certain point it's just time for someone with new ideas in charge.
If 1 was the opposite and we were rising as a conference than I'd say keep her on, she's bringing something to the table. Where 1 is the state of affairs, it's clear her leadership is stagnant at best, if not subpar
I think Thorr should get the job. As much as we would lose, we would gain.RF1 wrote: ↑1 year ago McGlade was a decent commissioner early on and maneuvered the league well early on. I however always thought moving the HQ away from most members to the Virginia shore was a selfish decision based solely on where she wanted to live.
That however does not mean she is suited to lead the conference today in a totally new college basketball environment. The A-10 is presently in decline under her watch. There does not seem to be much being done at the league administration level to right the ship. It may be time for her to make a graceful exit and bring in new blood with a different approach to the ever changing landscape of the sport.