Faaaantaaaastic!
Thanks for posting, Stevey. Sincerely appreciate the time and effort to put this together.
Really love the 3 trailing on the break.
Faaaantaaaastic!
Nice job Stevey, enjoyed watching him again.
Agreed on Thomas. I hate being wet blanket guy too, it’s a rebuilding year after all. But Thomas isn’t just bad at shooting, he’s just simply not a D1 shooter.
KingstonLane wrote: ↑1 year agoAgreed on Thomas. I hate being wet blanket guy too, it's a rebuilding year after all. But Thomas isn't just bad at shooting, he's just simply not a D1 shooter.
You need to be really really good at a lot of other things to justify seeing significant time on a good team with that recipe. And at a minimum be capable from the FT line. A lot of work to do for him to do. But never say never
I do agree that I don't view him as a starter on a top A10 team that lands a bid. Not yet. . The difference between last year and this year is Thomas has found other ways to score. Against Richmond, he ended up with 0 pts. He had 13 last night.SGreenwell wrote: ↑1 year ago I suppose I'll be the cold water guy, and say that no, I'm not going to get too high after we beat Stony Brook by 10. I don't really think we played that differently, except that Stony Brook is likely to end up the year as 300+ in KenPom, whereas the other two teams we played were more in the 150 to 250 range. I'm glad we didn't lose, but I don't think we've turned a corner or anything like that. I'd feel better if we pasted them by 20 and put the game away, instead of letting them hang around for most of the second half.
re: Individual players, positives - the Rams best five by PER this year is Leggett, Samb, Tchikou, Hutchinson and Martin, in that order. Hutchinson has been promising so far, because he seems like a player who can get some buckets without needing a play drawn up for him. (Well, not that we'd want to draw plays up for him at this point anyway.) Samb has been the most surprising to me, because it's very rare that a player goes from 0 MPG to a valuable contributor, but there was the unique and unusual circumstance of him being blocked by 3 better players last year. Leggett, if you take away his 2021-22 and instead projected "normal" progression for him, it would look more like this. I think the four with eligibility left can be part of the next good URI team.
re: Individual players, negatives - Hopefully, the one game benching helps get Freeman out of his funk. He's currently at -17.0 in PER, which is really, really hard to do. Carey and Weston also have negative PERs, although there's at least injury reasons you can attribute that to, for both of them. Stewart is at -3.2 PER, and pretty much only been used when the lineup needs someone greater than 6'6" with a pulse to log some minutes. If his shot isn't falling, he hasn't crashed the boards or shown enough on defense to justify playing.
Thomas' PER has barely budged (8.5 last year, 9.9 this year). I'd be more excited about the 10 assists if they weren't almost entirely wiped out by missing seven 3-point shots. This happened last year, too, where gaudy assist totals obscured what was essentially a net "meh" from a value perspective. He's not playable like this (starting PG minutes) in the A-10 if URI wants to win, not without a significant improvement in his shooting.
Gotta ask, you see Ulmer in who, Bassey?
I’m hoping/thinking he means Hutchinson.
He does not need to be a marksmen from deep but he does need to get to about 35% on open 3s. It is doable, but his shot is not very good looking so I am not overly optimistic it happens this year.TruePoint wrote: ↑1 year ago Those two little semi-floaters or whatever you’d call it that he hit from below the FT line (they were kind of push shots more than floaters) were very important makes in the context of the game. He can grow into a role on a good team without becoming a marksman from deep, he just needs to limit the 3pt attempts (he should not be taking seven in a game at his %) and come up with other ways to at least make defenses know where he is. If that little push shot from 8-12 feet is something he can reliably go to to get a bucket then that will help. If you get down into that area of the court and bigs have to come up to contest then you can unlock easy baskets at the rim for others. Ultimately, if we end up adding a point that can shoot it, it will be hard for Bassy to hold him off for minutes but until then he has an opportunity to grow into the job.
Yes Hutchinson, a similar size, and athleticism, mid-range guy.Rhody15 wrote: ↑1 year agoI’m hoping/thinking he means Hutchinson.
Guessing the ESPN app as the first few games were on ESPN+Jdrums#3 wrote: ↑1 year agoPhipsi, what app did you use to watch it on your phone?phipsiGD'11 wrote: ↑1 year ago Had to watch from my phone, but pumped for the team to get their first win.
I'm not going to reiterate what everyone else has said already, except that this team is already starting to be fun to watch because of the ball movement. I got the feeling in the 2nd half that everyone knew the outside shot wasn't really falling, but our ball movement kept getting people open in good positions. if those shots start falling later in the year, it is going to be fun to watch them develop into the A10 tournament.
I am still obviously keeping expectations low for this team, and maybe that is why they are already more fun to watch.
Excellent comments, btw. I really am enjoying the comments from those who are able to watch in-person on from elsewhere.
If he can be half as good as Yuri Collins one day I'll be thrilledbigappleram wrote: ↑1 year ago I always think Yuri Collins is a good comp for Thomas in terms of ceiling
The issue is his best skills in terms of playmaking, finding guys, facilitating are eventually limited if you don’t need to cover him outside 15 feet. It will kill spacing. There is just no scenario where you can have effective offense with a PG shooting below 10% from the three.
On the other hand our limited offense generally looks it’s best with him on the floor. There quite simply isn’t a better option. He does have great vision and a natural passing ability superior to anyone else on the roster. Ish isn’t a PG. Bray has been MIA.
He’s like a mid level floor but low ceiling guy right now bc his shooting percentages are so bad.
Many of us remember Carlos Easterling; he was eventually phased out for a PG who could score (Jason Gilliam).
But Easterling could shoot - not like Thomas at this point.bigappleram wrote: ↑1 year ago I always think Yuri Collins is a good comp for Thomas in terms of ceiling
The issue is his best skills in terms of playmaking, finding guys, facilitating are eventually limited if you don’t need to cover him outside 15 feet. It will kill spacing. There is just no scenario where you can have effective offense with a PG shooting below 10% from the three.
On the other hand our limited offense generally looks it’s best with him on the floor. There quite simply isn’t a better option. He does have great vision and a natural passing ability superior to anyone else on the roster. Ish isn’t a PG. Bray has been MIA.
He’s like a mid level floor but low ceiling guy right now bc his shooting percentages are so bad.
Many of us remember Carlos Easterling; he was eventually phased out for a PG who could score (Jason Gilliam).
My problem with this comparison that's hard for me to prove - I don't think most guys develop into Collins, because improving your shooting is usually the toughest aspect of basketball to improve in. (This would be easier on Pro Basketball Reference, where the stat tools are a bit more robust, but fooling around with it earlier, I was having trouble identifying players with stat lines similar to Thomas' freshman year.)bigappleram wrote: ↑1 year ago I always think Yuri Collins is a good comp for Thomas in terms of ceiling
The issue is his best skills in terms of playmaking, finding guys, facilitating are eventually limited if you don’t need to cover him outside 15 feet. It will kill spacing. There is just no scenario where you can have effective offense with a PG shooting below 10% from the three.
On the other hand our limited offense generally looks it’s best with him on the floor. There quite simply isn’t a better option. He does have great vision and a natural passing ability superior to anyone else on the roster. Ish isn’t a PG. Bray has been MIA.
He’s like a mid level floor but low ceiling guy right now bc his shooting percentages are so bad.
Many of us remember Carlos Easterling; he was eventually phased out for a PG who could score (Jason Gilliam).
Wow those numbers surprise me but the volume is so low I prob forgot the .5 threes per game he made over course of his career. He just wasn’t a perimeter threat and it limited the offense over time.ramster wrote: ↑1 year agoBut Easterling could shoot - not like Thomas at this point.bigappleram wrote: ↑1 year ago I always think Yuri Collins is a good comp for Thomas in terms of ceiling
The issue is his best skills in terms of playmaking, finding guys, facilitating are eventually limited if you don’t need to cover him outside 15 feet. It will kill spacing. There is just no scenario where you can have effective offense with a PG shooting below 10% from the three.
On the other hand our limited offense generally looks it’s best with him on the floor. There quite simply isn’t a better option. He does have great vision and a natural passing ability superior to anyone else on the roster. Ish isn’t a PG. Bray has been MIA.
He’s like a mid level floor but low ceiling guy right now bc his shooting percentages are so bad.
Many of us remember Carlos Easterling; he was eventually phased out for a PG who could score (Jason Gilliam).
3P% / FT%
Freshman 30 / 77
Soph 46 / 77
Junior 52 / 79
Senior 40 / 81
Over 4 Years
3FG: 49-120 = 40.8%
FT: 192 - 245 = 78.4%
Blue Man,Blue Man wrote: ↑1 year ago I'm a bit disappointed at the lack of excitement here. I don't care that it's Stony Brook. I don't care they had missing pieces (so did we). I don't care if the game was played in a box. I don't care if it was played with a fox. FIRST WIN. YOUNG GUYS. LETS GO.
Again. This was another game where you saw improvement from the previous game and from the previous half.
I love watching this offense - even if sometimes I have to cover my eyes when we're shooting. We create a ton of open chances. We create a ton of confusion. We can get to the basket. We can effectively dismantle a zone with ball movement. And our fast break. Holy hell I forgot how much I missed it. This team looks to run and can finish.
But we're still improving - yes, I know what Archie said about Bassy's supposed shooting prowess in practice. But I also know what my eyes have seen. If he didn't take another 3 all year I wouldn't hate it. He does so many things well. He can push the ball. He can see the floor. He can put his guys is spots to make shots. He can get inside and score. Him shooting from outside is less than ideal.
Lou Hutch. I believe I said many times this kid was going to be our cornerstone in future years. I'm pretty sure that was poopoo'd because he was "too raw" or not the right body. B-b-b-bullshit! ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED. Kid is clearly shaking off nerves, but when we needed him to step up, he effectively put the game away with those huge 3's in the 2nd half. He's big. He's a huge asset to distribute and break up a zone from the high post. He's smart. He is going to be this team's leader and cornerstone in 2-3 years, and I'm sure he'll have growing pains - but he's going to give us a lot of memories this season.
Weston is still hurt, back spasms are a lingering bitch, but you could see flashes tonight when he got loose.
Samb is really looking like a player and has had 2 games in a row of hitting freethrows at a rate I'm not accustomed to from our bigs.
Ish. Ish is coming back. New coach. New system. New him. He's starting to look like the kid we thought we were getting.
The effort. God this is so much fun. Guys diving on balls. Guys running. Guys trailing on breaks. Team defense. Archie is getting the best out of these guys. It was a hustle play in the backcourt from Weston and Bassy at the end that sealed the game.
That brings me to culture. All of that win happened while our "best" transfer sat on the bench. Watching Bray respond on the bench last night was refreshing. His body language had improved. He was cheering on the guys. He was joking with Rory and Mazzulla. He was learning a valuable lesson that no one is above the team - no matter their accolades or previous achievements.
Archie isn't going to let the kids call the shots. He's going to be the adult. He's going to mold them into men. Sitting your "best" player and letting him see there were opportunities for him to play and make us better, but we didn't NEED him. You play the right way or you don't play at all.
I love everything about this team. This coach. And what we're doing. My only expectation for this year is to get better and become a team that can win and win big in March and in future years. This is fun.
LETS GO! ARCHIES FIRST OF MANY! LETS SHOCK THE WORLD AND BEAT K STATE!!
Louis has definitely lost weight. I saw him and the other guys throwing a football in early September. Louis didn't have a shirt on. He's a strong kid, very long and athletic. I had mono my freshman year at URI and I lost 40 pounds, going from 175 to 135. I'm sure he didn't lose that much, but when you have it you have zero appetite. You have to force food down your throat. He's probably still in the process of putting the weight back on.ramster wrote: ↑1 year agoBlue Man,Blue Man wrote: ↑1 year ago I'm a bit disappointed at the lack of excitement here. I don't care that it's Stony Brook. I don't care they had missing pieces (so did we). I don't care if the game was played in a box. I don't care if it was played with a fox. FIRST WIN. YOUNG GUYS. LETS GO.
Again. This was another game where you saw improvement from the previous game and from the previous half.
I love watching this offense - even if sometimes I have to cover my eyes when we're shooting. We create a ton of open chances. We create a ton of confusion. We can get to the basket. We can effectively dismantle a zone with ball movement. And our fast break. Holy hell I forgot how much I missed it. This team looks to run and can finish.
But we're still improving - yes, I know what Archie said about Bassy's supposed shooting prowess in practice. But I also know what my eyes have seen. If he didn't take another 3 all year I wouldn't hate it. He does so many things well. He can push the ball. He can see the floor. He can put his guys is spots to make shots. He can get inside and score. Him shooting from outside is less than ideal.
Lou Hutch. I believe I said many times this kid was going to be our cornerstone in future years. I'm pretty sure that was poopoo'd because he was "too raw" or not the right body. B-b-b-bullshit! ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED. Kid is clearly shaking off nerves, but when we needed him to step up, he effectively put the game away with those huge 3's in the 2nd half. He's big. He's a huge asset to distribute and break up a zone from the high post. He's smart. He is going to be this team's leader and cornerstone in 2-3 years, and I'm sure he'll have growing pains - but he's going to give us a lot of memories this season.
Weston is still hurt, back spasms are a lingering bitch, but you could see flashes tonight when he got loose.
Samb is really looking like a player and has had 2 games in a row of hitting freethrows at a rate I'm not accustomed to from our bigs.
Ish. Ish is coming back. New coach. New system. New him. He's starting to look like the kid we thought we were getting.
The effort. God this is so much fun. Guys diving on balls. Guys running. Guys trailing on breaks. Team defense. Archie is getting the best out of these guys. It was a hustle play in the backcourt from Weston and Bassy at the end that sealed the game.
That brings me to culture. All of that win happened while our "best" transfer sat on the bench. Watching Bray respond on the bench last night was refreshing. His body language had improved. He was cheering on the guys. He was joking with Rory and Mazzulla. He was learning a valuable lesson that no one is above the team - no matter their accolades or previous achievements.
Archie isn't going to let the kids call the shots. He's going to be the adult. He's going to mold them into men. Sitting your "best" player and letting him see there were opportunities for him to play and make us better, but we didn't NEED him. You play the right way or you don't play at all.
I love everything about this team. This coach. And what we're doing. My only expectation for this year is to get better and become a team that can win and win big in March and in future years. This is fun.
LETS GO! ARCHIES FIRST OF MANY! LETS SHOCK THE WORLD AND BEAT K STATE!!
Don’t think it’s so much Hutchinson has been shaking off nerves or people underestimated him. He is just a freshman and he has been sick with mononucleosis. That takes a lot out of a person and takes time to fully recover.
Now having recovered (maybe not fully yet) he took full advantage (maybe an understatement) of the minutes provided to him vs Stony Brook. Freeman and Carey being out, Weston with some health challenges, plus some personal foul challenges for some players gave Hutch some opportunity minutes that he answered beautifully!
As he gains his strength and energy back it will be fun to watch his Freshman year progress.
You mean Jason Alexander, not Gilliam if memory serves. If I recall, Alexander transferred after the 93 season. I think he may have left the team mid season - I don't recall the details, but I do remember him missing a stretch for a non injury reason. Sports reference seems to back this up with only 17 games played that season, sitting out the next for his transfer to Stetson. All that said, I don't recall him playing in the NCAA tournament game vs. Purdue (and I blocked out the blowout loss to UNC).bigappleram wrote: ↑1 year ago I always think Yuri Collins is a good comp for Thomas in terms of ceiling
The issue is his best skills in terms of playmaking, finding guys, facilitating are eventually limited if you don’t need to cover him outside 15 feet. It will kill spacing. There is just no scenario where you can have effective offense with a PG shooting below 10% from the three.
On the other hand our limited offense generally looks it’s best with him on the floor. There quite simply isn’t a better option. He does have great vision and a natural passing ability superior to anyone else on the roster. Ish isn’t a PG. Bray has been MIA.
He’s like a mid level floor but low ceiling guy right now bc his shooting percentages are so bad.
Many of us remember Carlos Easterling; he was eventually phased out for a PG who could score (Jason Gilliam).
Thanks bar - I didn't know he had a different name. I only remember him as Alexander. Too bad he transferred. The next couple of years would have been better.bigappleram wrote: ↑1 year ago Jason Gilliam was his original name, changed it to Alexander at some point (I presume his mother's name). I actually went to Al Skinner URI camp with Gilliam when we were both about 12 years old. He was the best kid at camp and head and shoulders better than anyone else. He did transfer mid season I believe you are right. Carlos Cofield I believe was the PG on the team that beat Purdue.
Also while Easterling's percentages kinda shock me it's worth noting he averaged 1 three point attempt per game for his career. He just wouldn't take them; which ultimately limits effectiveness. And I'm sticking to my premise that a PG that isn't an outside threat ultimately creates a lower ceiling for a team.
BAR, It was along time ago for Carlos Easterling, in fact not long after the 3P was approved. Al Skinner himself was adjusting to the new wrinkle.bigappleram wrote: ↑1 year ago Jason Gilliam was his original name, changed it to Alexander at some point (I presume his mother's name). I actually went to Al Skinner URI camp with Gilliam when we were both about 12 years old. He was the best kid at camp and head and shoulders better than anyone else. He did transfer mid season I believe you are right. Carlos Cofield I believe was the PG on the team that beat Purdue.
Also while Easterling's percentages kinda shock me it's worth noting he averaged 1 three point attempt per game for his career. He just wouldn't take them; which ultimately limits effectiveness. And I'm sticking to my premise that a PG that isn't an outside threat ultimately creates a lower ceiling for a team.
I love Lou's first two shots from the FT line at the top of the zone. No dribble - kept ball high and put a nice shot up - even if he doesn't make - high percentage shot and low percentage T/O
We've also been incredibly unlucky with injuriesBlue Man wrote: ↑1 year ago I'm a bit disappointed at the lack of excitement here. I don't care that it's Stony Brook. I don't care they had missing pieces (so did we). I don't care if the game was played in a box. I don't care if it was played with a fox. FIRST WIN. YOUNG GUYS. LETS GO.
Again. This was another game where you saw improvement from the previous game and from the previous half.
I love watching this offense - even if sometimes I have to cover my eyes when we're shooting. We create a ton of open chances. We create a ton of confusion. We can get to the basket. We can effectively dismantle a zone with ball movement. And our fast break. Holy hell I forgot how much I missed it. This team looks to run and can finish.
But we're still improving - yes, I know what Archie said about Bassy's supposed shooting prowess in practice. But I also know what my eyes have seen. If he didn't take another 3 all year I wouldn't hate it. He does so many things well. He can push the ball. He can see the floor. He can put his guys is spots to make shots. He can get inside and score. Him shooting from outside is less than ideal.
Lou Hutch. I believe I said many times this kid was going to be our cornerstone in future years. I'm pretty sure that was poopoo'd because he was "too raw" or not the right body. B-b-b-bullshit! ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED. Kid is clearly shaking off nerves, but when we needed him to step up, he effectively put the game away with those huge 3's in the 2nd half. He's big. He's a huge asset to distribute and break up a zone from the high post. He's smart. He is going to be this team's leader and cornerstone in 2-3 years, and I'm sure he'll have growing pains - but he's going to give us a lot of memories this season.
Weston is still hurt, back spasms are a lingering bitch, but you could see flashes tonight when he got loose.
Samb is really looking like a player and has had 2 games in a row of hitting freethrows at a rate I'm not accustomed to from our bigs.
Ish. Ish is coming back. New coach. New system. New him. He's starting to look like the kid we thought we were getting.
The effort. God this is so much fun. Guys diving on balls. Guys running. Guys trailing on breaks. Team defense. Archie is getting the best out of these guys. It was a hustle play in the backcourt from Weston and Bassy at the end that sealed the game.
That brings me to culture. All of that win happened while our "best" transfer sat on the bench. Watching Bray respond on the bench last night was refreshing. His body language had improved. He was cheering on the guys. He was joking with Rory and Mazzulla. He was learning a valuable lesson that no one is above the team - no matter their accolades or previous achievements.
Archie isn't going to let the kids call the shots. He's going to be the adult. He's going to mold them into men. Sitting your "best" player and letting him see there were opportunities for him to play and make us better, but we didn't NEED him. You play the right way or you don't play at all.
I love everything about this team. This coach. And what we're doing. My only expectation for this year is to get better and become a team that can win and win big in March and in future years. This is fun.
LETS GO! ARCHIES FIRST OF MANY! LETS SHOCK THE WORLD AND BEAT K STATE!!
\PeterRamTime wrote: ↑1 year agoWe've also been incredibly unlucky with injuriesBlue Man wrote: ↑1 year ago I'm a bit disappointed at the lack of excitement here. I don't care that it's Stony Brook. I don't care they had missing pieces (so did we). I don't care if the game was played in a box. I don't care if it was played with a fox. FIRST WIN. YOUNG GUYS. LETS GO.
Again. This was another game where you saw improvement from the previous game and from the previous half.
I love watching this offense - even if sometimes I have to cover my eyes when we're shooting. We create a ton of open chances. We create a ton of confusion. We can get to the basket. We can effectively dismantle a zone with ball movement. And our fast break. Holy hell I forgot how much I missed it. This team looks to run and can finish.
But we're still improving - yes, I know what Archie said about Bassy's supposed shooting prowess in practice. But I also know what my eyes have seen. If he didn't take another 3 all year I wouldn't hate it. He does so many things well. He can push the ball. He can see the floor. He can put his guys is spots to make shots. He can get inside and score. Him shooting from outside is less than ideal.
Lou Hutch. I believe I said many times this kid was going to be our cornerstone in future years. I'm pretty sure that was poopoo'd because he was "too raw" or not the right body. B-b-b-bullshit! ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED. Kid is clearly shaking off nerves, but when we needed him to step up, he effectively put the game away with those huge 3's in the 2nd half. He's big. He's a huge asset to distribute and break up a zone from the high post. He's smart. He is going to be this team's leader and cornerstone in 2-3 years, and I'm sure he'll have growing pains - but he's going to give us a lot of memories this season.
Weston is still hurt, back spasms are a lingering bitch, but you could see flashes tonight when he got loose.
Samb is really looking like a player and has had 2 games in a row of hitting freethrows at a rate I'm not accustomed to from our bigs.
Ish. Ish is coming back. New coach. New system. New him. He's starting to look like the kid we thought we were getting.
The effort. God this is so much fun. Guys diving on balls. Guys running. Guys trailing on breaks. Team defense. Archie is getting the best out of these guys. It was a hustle play in the backcourt from Weston and Bassy at the end that sealed the game.
That brings me to culture. All of that win happened while our "best" transfer sat on the bench. Watching Bray respond on the bench last night was refreshing. His body language had improved. He was cheering on the guys. He was joking with Rory and Mazzulla. He was learning a valuable lesson that no one is above the team - no matter their accolades or previous achievements.
Archie isn't going to let the kids call the shots. He's going to be the adult. He's going to mold them into men. Sitting your "best" player and letting him see there were opportunities for him to play and make us better, but we didn't NEED him. You play the right way or you don't play at all.
I love everything about this team. This coach. And what we're doing. My only expectation for this year is to get better and become a team that can win and win big in March and in future years. This is fun.
LETS GO! ARCHIES FIRST OF MANY! LETS SHOCK THE WORLD AND BEAT K STATE!!
(Carey, Weston and Bilau)
Ant Harris not being eligible
Bray having his issues
I mean if we had all those guys ready to go we would probably have three straight 20+ wins.
That's what the Stony Brook win with half our team told me.
First of all, take Harris off the table, he was never even enrolled.Rhodymob05 wrote: ↑1 year ago I definitely would not agree that most teams are dealing with worse than URI.
Harris-Academic issues
Carey-Injured/limited
Foumena-Redshirt (personal reasons??)
Weston-Injured/limited
Bilau-Surgery/Injured
Hutchinson-Illness
Freeman-Out (coaches decision)
That's half the roster.
God damn Jersey me and you share 99% of the same opinions!Jersey77 wrote: ↑1 year agoFirst of all, take Harris off the table, he was never even enrolled.Rhodymob05 wrote: ↑1 year ago I definitely would not agree that most teams are dealing with worse than URI.
Harris-Academic issues
Carey-Injured/limited
Foumena-Redshirt (personal reasons??)
Weston-Injured/limited
Bilau-Surgery/Injured
Hutchinson-Illness
Freeman-Out (coaches decision)
That's half the roster.
Many teams lost impact/starting players indefinitely that are actually on the roster.
Foumena is redshirting because he isn't ready.
Not sure we are the only school redshirting a true freshman.
Weston and Hutch are both playing, but were previously slowed.
The biggest knock on Weston was his ability to stay healthy, again we knew his history.
Not unusual for any program to have players a little banged up.
Freeman sat one game to get his head straight.
The only big deal here is his early funk.
Not sure why you're attacking my point so hard.Jersey77 wrote: ↑1 year ago\PeterRamTime wrote: ↑1 year agoWe've also been incredibly unlucky with injuriesBlue Man wrote: ↑1 year ago I'm a bit disappointed at the lack of excitement here. I don't care that it's Stony Brook. I don't care they had missing pieces (so did we). I don't care if the game was played in a box. I don't care if it was played with a fox. FIRST WIN. YOUNG GUYS. LETS GO.
Again. This was another game where you saw improvement from the previous game and from the previous half.
I love watching this offense - even if sometimes I have to cover my eyes when we're shooting. We create a ton of open chances. We create a ton of confusion. We can get to the basket. We can effectively dismantle a zone with ball movement. And our fast break. Holy hell I forgot how much I missed it. This team looks to run and can finish.
But we're still improving - yes, I know what Archie said about Bassy's supposed shooting prowess in practice. But I also know what my eyes have seen. If he didn't take another 3 all year I wouldn't hate it. He does so many things well. He can push the ball. He can see the floor. He can put his guys is spots to make shots. He can get inside and score. Him shooting from outside is less than ideal.
Lou Hutch. I believe I said many times this kid was going to be our cornerstone in future years. I'm pretty sure that was poopoo'd because he was "too raw" or not the right body. B-b-b-bullshit! ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED. Kid is clearly shaking off nerves, but when we needed him to step up, he effectively put the game away with those huge 3's in the 2nd half. He's big. He's a huge asset to distribute and break up a zone from the high post. He's smart. He is going to be this team's leader and cornerstone in 2-3 years, and I'm sure he'll have growing pains - but he's going to give us a lot of memories this season.
Weston is still hurt, back spasms are a lingering bitch, but you could see flashes tonight when he got loose.
Samb is really looking like a player and has had 2 games in a row of hitting freethrows at a rate I'm not accustomed to from our bigs.
Ish. Ish is coming back. New coach. New system. New him. He's starting to look like the kid we thought we were getting.
The effort. God this is so much fun. Guys diving on balls. Guys running. Guys trailing on breaks. Team defense. Archie is getting the best out of these guys. It was a hustle play in the backcourt from Weston and Bassy at the end that sealed the game.
That brings me to culture. All of that win happened while our "best" transfer sat on the bench. Watching Bray respond on the bench last night was refreshing. His body language had improved. He was cheering on the guys. He was joking with Rory and Mazzulla. He was learning a valuable lesson that no one is above the team - no matter their accolades or previous achievements.
Archie isn't going to let the kids call the shots. He's going to be the adult. He's going to mold them into men. Sitting your "best" player and letting him see there were opportunities for him to play and make us better, but we didn't NEED him. You play the right way or you don't play at all.
I love everything about this team. This coach. And what we're doing. My only expectation for this year is to get better and become a team that can win and win big in March and in future years. This is fun.
LETS GO! ARCHIES FIRST OF MANY! LETS SHOCK THE WORLD AND BEAT K STATE!!
(Carey, Weston and Bilau)
Ant Harris not being eligible
Bray having his issues
I mean if we had all those guys ready to go we would probably have three straight 20+ wins.
That's what the Stony Brook win with half our team told me.
Just trying to put things into perspective, we are talking about a win over Stony Brook at home.
3 straight 20+ wins, is a huge reach.
I thought we would be mid-level A10 at best, even with everyone.
All teams are dealing with injury issues, and much worse than us.
They knew about Ant's academic issues all along, shouldn't be a great surprise.
Look this rebuild will take some time, be patient.
Everyone is available except Bilau and he will return sometime in December.PeterRamTime wrote: ↑1 year agoNot sure why you're attacking my point so hard.Jersey77 wrote: ↑1 year ago\PeterRamTime wrote: ↑1 year ago
We've also been incredibly unlucky with injuries
(Carey, Weston and Bilau)
Ant Harris not being eligible
Bray having his issues
I mean if we had all those guys ready to go we would probably have three straight 20+ wins.
That's what the Stony Brook win with half our team told me.
Just trying to put things into perspective, we are talking about a win over Stony Brook at home.
3 straight 20+ wins, is a huge reach.
I thought we would be mid-level A10 at best, even with everyone.
All teams are dealing with injury issues, and much worse than us.
They knew about Ant's academic issues all along, shouldn't be a great surprise.
Look this rebuild will take some time, be patient.
We clearly would be vastly better with a healthy ready to go Bray, Carey, Ant Harris, Bilau and Brandon Weston.
I mean we just lost two very close games and won a game by double digits with literally half of the players we thought we'd have producing.
All teams are dealing with injury issues? No they aren't and I question there are very many teams dealing with worse.
Do tell me when was the last time we opened the season with three guys injured (Bilau, Carey, Weston) Then Bray is all in his head and can't play and then Ant Harris isn't eligible.
Maybe the 04-05 year is the last time we had this many injury problems. Like one year ever pretty much.
I'm not here saying we go to the tournament with everybody, but we've been competitive with a skeleton of a team.
Because Ant is not part of our team, I don't really count him.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑1 year ago The only player that I think could have made a difference so far is Ant Harris. I think he would instantly be our best defensive guard and would have been able to slow down Harrell. With Ant, I think we would be 2-1.
Yeah Blue Man, I am not too concerned about our record this season.Blue Man wrote: ↑1 year ago With or without Ant - we had multiple 3's go 3/4 down the cylinder and bounce out in game 1. if 2 of those just go all the way down we win that game.
If the refs don't make that boneheaded offensive basket interference that wasn't, we probably win game 2.
I don't care about who we beat or lose to at this point - that's a problem for year 3 when we're looking for an at-large. This year, OOC especially, is about building a culture and a team that can make a run in March this year, or win big in the years to come. By those standards I'm thrilled with what we've seen, understanding we have a long way to go. But we're a lot closer to winning these games than people on here are giving credit for.
Don't be surprised if we go and shock the world by knocking off K State on Monday night. Also don't be surprised if we lose by 40. REBUILDING BABY ENJOY THE RIDE!
I haven't gone back and read every post, but I think the topic of discussion is if we have had some bad luck so far this season, correct?...If so, I agree with Peterram that we took an unlucky hit once Ant became ineligible. We also got screwed in the Texas State game.Jersey77 wrote: ↑1 year agoBecause Ant is not part of our team, I don't really count him.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑1 year ago The only player that I think could have made a difference so far is Ant Harris. I think he would instantly be our best defensive guard and would have been able to slow down Harrell. With Ant, I think we would be 2-1.
No reason to really speculate because we haven't seen him, and he is not here.
His academic issues probably caused many teams to back off of him in the portal.
We took a chance knowing the circumstances.
Hopefully he comes next semester and from what we hear contributes next season.
And yeah Stevey, if and when he does arrive, I think you are correct that he can make an impact on our team.
Yeah Stevey it didn't work out for Ant at least for now.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑1 year agoI haven't gone back and read every post, but I think the topic of discussion is if we have had some bad luck so far this season, correct?...If so, I agree with Peterram that we took an unlucky hit once Ant became ineligible. We also got screwed in the Texas State game.Jersey77 wrote: ↑1 year agoBecause Ant is not part of our team, I don't really count him.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑1 year ago The only player that I think could have made a difference so far is Ant Harris. I think he would instantly be our best defensive guard and would have been able to slow down Harrell. With Ant, I think we would be 2-1.
No reason to really speculate because we haven't seen him, and he is not here.
His academic issues probably caused many teams to back off of him in the portal.
We took a chance knowing the circumstances.
Hopefully he comes next semester and from what we hear contributes next season.
And yeah Stevey, if and when he does arrive, I think you are correct that he can make an impact on our team.
I count anyone that is still committed and signed to play this season.. It's not like Ant committed and then decommited. Archie didn't sign him thinking he would redshirt or sit out a year. Was it a risk? Sure. But I don't believe for a second that Archie would have brought him in if he knew this would happen. Because of that, I view it as bad luck because we are wasting a scholarship on a player we thought would immediately make a significant impact. Maybe that's our coaching staff's fault, but they are too experienced and good at their jobs not to confirm that Ant would be ready to play.
OMGJersey77 wrote: ↑1 year agoEveryone is available except Bilau and he will return sometime in December.PeterRamTime wrote: ↑1 year agoNot sure why you're attacking my point so hard.Jersey77 wrote: ↑1 year ago
\
Just trying to put things into perspective, we are talking about a win over Stony Brook at home.
3 straight 20+ wins, is a huge reach.
I thought we would be mid-level A10 at best, even with everyone.
All teams are dealing with injury issues, and much worse than us.
They knew about Ant's academic issues all along, shouldn't be a great surprise.
Look this rebuild will take some time, be patient.
We clearly would be vastly better with a healthy ready to go Bray, Carey, Ant Harris, Bilau and Brandon Weston.
I mean we just lost two very close games and won a game by double digits with literally half of the players we thought we'd have producing.
All teams are dealing with injury issues? No they aren't and I question there are very many teams dealing with worse.
Do tell me when was the last time we opened the season with three guys injured (Bilau, Carey, Weston) Then Bray is all in his head and can't play and then Ant Harris isn't eligible.
Maybe the 04-05 year is the last time we had this many injury problems. Like one year ever pretty much.
I'm not here saying we go to the tournament with everybody, but we've been competitive with a skeleton of a team.
I wouldn't put him in the same category as other teams losing a significant impact player for an indefinite period.
He was not going to give us 20+ wins or top tier A10.
Yes, we would have more depth upfront and we may be slightly better, but that's about it.
There are probably very few teams out there, that don't have some players banged up.
Archie is certainly not making any excuses for our losses or poor play, and neither should we.