Head coach speculation for 2022-23
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 15111
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5371
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
That’s the downside of coaching in a crap conference and probably why he leaves for a decent P6 maybe after next year
-
- ARD
- Posts: 523
- Joined: 10 years ago
- x 549
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
Ok Shaheen Holloway seems pretty aight too.
-
- Lamar Odom
- Posts: 327
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 137
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
Archie is a Ram! LFG!
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Boston
- x 2706
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
He's gonna get whatever job he wants.
-
- Cuttino Mobley
- Posts: 1590
- Joined: 3 years ago
- x 1656
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
Funny how that win alone will elevate Holloway to a new pedigree
-
- Lamar Odom
- Posts: 327
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 137
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
Jeff Goodman reporting it is official. Let’s go Archie!
-
- ARD
- Posts: 736
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 749
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
Obviously very excited about the Archie news but Holloway is legit.
-
- Jeff Kent
- Posts: 171
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 68
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
Glad to hear this but what about the 14 day rule? It’s stupid for a position like this but some politician will probably have something to say if announced officially too soon
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10403
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 6667
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
Any politician that has a problem with this can call my attorney Heywood Jablowme
Take down the Robert Carothers banner and fix the concession stand lines
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 13857
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 11440
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
I tried telling people when this started that two people can agree on anything at any time. I don't see how an administrative rule can prevent that. Obviously these rules serve some purpose for ordinary jobs, but this is not like other state job postings. The rule is unenforceable in this context, and I think it is a good sign for how our people are thinking now that they are going to blow past dumb "rules" that make their jobs harder and force somebody to prove to them that it is actually relevant to them.
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4853
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 3160
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
Bleed Keaney Blue!
”I'm not coming there to be in the top 3 of the Atlantic 10. I'm coming to win the damn thing!”
”I'm not coming there to be in the top 3 of the Atlantic 10. I'm coming to win the damn thing!”
-
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 3258
- Joined: 10 years ago
- Location: Narragansett
- x 2524
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
A new era!!!
-
- Cuttino Mobley
- Posts: 1527
- Joined: 9 years ago
- Location: The Pier
- x 1714
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
Yeah my wife is an attorney and was like yeah that’s not an actual law or anything lolTruePoint wrote: ↑2 years agoI tried telling people when this started that two people can agree on anything at any time. I don't see how an administrative rule can prevent that. Obviously these rules serve some purpose for ordinary jobs, but this is not like other state job postings. The rule is unenforceable in this context, and I think it is a good sign for how our people are thinking now that they are going to blow past dumb "rules" that make their jobs harder and force somebody to prove to them that it is actually relevant to them.
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4853
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 3160
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Bleed Keaney Blue!
”I'm not coming there to be in the top 3 of the Atlantic 10. I'm coming to win the damn thing!”
”I'm not coming there to be in the top 3 of the Atlantic 10. I'm coming to win the damn thing!”
-
- Tyson Wheeler
- Posts: 7486
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Rhode Island
- x 4040
-
- Lamar Odom
- Posts: 327
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 137
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
Reports are Archie signed a 5/9.5, with incentives that can take it higher. That is less than I expected. They also raised the budget for assistants to $750,000.
-
- Cuttino Mobley
- Posts: 1750
- Joined: 9 years ago
- Location: Las Vegas
- x 2181
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
Don't forget he's still netting another $4m from Indiana's buyout after the offset from his RI salary
---
He was a snake oil salesman...just like the rest of em
---
He was a snake oil salesman...just like the rest of em
---
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8091
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5669
-
- Tom Garrick
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: 6 years ago
- x 878
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 7797
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Rhode Island
- x 6579
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
I’d love to know how many leftover towels they have that they couldn’t give out to season ticket holders who had tickets under one account.
They’ll probably be giving these towels out for years to come.
Go Rhody
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 12604
- Joined: 8 years ago
- x 6808
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
What's the new signage?
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16877
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9037
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
You'll have to go out and take a ride and win yourself a towel.
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8908
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 10020
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
An Archie billboard would be epic. CT had 1 up for Dan within a week of the hiring. It matters.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16877
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9037
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8908
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 10020
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
Yessssssss
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8908
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 10020
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
What’s also crazy about this clip - 3 of the 5 guys on floor for Richmond will suit up today for them. Meanwhile it feels like Jared and EC have been gone forever. Everyone but Fatts is multiple years into their pro careers.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16877
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9037
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
I think it's time to change the theme of this thread to 'Assistant Coach Speculation'. Who is Archie talking to ?
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: 4 years ago
- x 4077
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
Good Idea.Billyboy78 wrote: ↑2 years ago I think it's time to change the theme of this thread to 'Assistant Coach Speculation'. Who is Archie talking to ?
I would love: Tom Ostrom, Matt Abdelmassih, and maybe Tyson Wheeler or keep TJ.
I wouldn't object to see Jamion Christian either.
-
- Kenny Green
- Posts: 236
- Joined: 8 years ago
- x 352
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
Keep TJ? What as assistant to the assistant to the guy who is director of basketball operations? lol
I love TJ and if he is on staff it should be a position that is drastically reduced. He is clearly support staff material.
I love TJ and if he is on staff it should be a position that is drastically reduced. He is clearly support staff material.
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8091
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5669
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
TJ would likely be perfectly fine as a third assistant. The problem was the entire composition of the staff.
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: 4 years ago
- x 4077
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
My only thought is if you have to pay big $ for 2 top assistants, maybe keep TJ in a diminished role.
TJ is well liked by the players and building good recruiting connections.
-
- Kenny Green
- Posts: 236
- Joined: 8 years ago
- x 352
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
Jersey sorry I came across harsh. You are correct with thinking big money for top two and less for third. Just would want more out of third assistant. Thinking TJ maybe -Director of Player Development. TJ will be great one day and he should build those relationships at another school and maybe come back when ready. We need Coaches with deep established relationships. TJ now has a resume and can go get a third assistant job at a NEC, MAAC, American East program and continue to grow.
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: 4 years ago
- x 4077
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
No problem.LIRAM wrote: ↑2 years ago Jersey sorry I came across harsh. You are correct with thinking big money for top two and less for third. Just would want more out of third assistant. Thinking TJ maybe -Director of Player Development. TJ will be great one day and he should build those relationships at another school and maybe come back when ready. We need Coaches with deep established relationships. TJ now has a resume and can go get a third assistant job at a NEC, MAAC, American East program and continue to grow.
If we can get 2 high powered assistants, which would eat up most of the salary pool, I wouldn't necessarily object to keeping TJ in whatever role.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 12604
- Joined: 8 years ago
- x 6808
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
By the time I planned for that kind of Rhode trip...I mean that has to be 20 miles from my house...the towels would be gone?
-
- Tom Garrick
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: 6 years ago
- x 878
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
I think Austin wants to stay on too. He was on the S.Miller staff at Arizona.
Seems like, at most, he'd keep one of Austin or TJ.
Seems like, at most, he'd keep one of Austin or TJ.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 15111
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5371
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
No problem from me with TJ as a 3rd assistant he’s got some experience now
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5575
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
At least one member of the staff is typically kept on for continuity when there is a head coaching change. This person is usually the bridge to the players staying in the program and is someone that can provide the new coach with history and context on program matters. Buchanan has the most time in Kingston. Played for the program having graduated in 2015 and was on the staff of the previous two head coaches dating back to September 2017. I would think he would have a leg up on Carroll who has been on staff since September 2019. Ultimately it will be up to Miller and may simply come down to who he is more comfortable with or who might better complement the rest of his staff. I would think Miller's top two guys will be at a higher level and possibly have existing connections to Archie. They will get the bigger dollars and do more of the heavy lifting. I would think there is little chance that Miller would retain Bozeman.
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: 4 years ago
- x 4077
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
If Al Pinkins isn't retained at Florida or scooped up by South Carolina or LSU, I would take him in a minute on Archie's staff.
He is a top recruiter and considered one of the best frontcourt coaches.
The twins would thrive under him.
He is a top recruiter and considered one of the best frontcourt coaches.
The twins would thrive under him.
-
- Cuttino Mobley
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 1965
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
For context, he is making around $315k per year at Florida so it will come down to how Archie wants to allocate the assistant salaries between the 3 positions.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 15111
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5371
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
Good call on Pinkins , I wonder if Arch knows him ?? Maybe if we can offer him 350,000 he will come
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: 4 years ago
- x 4077
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
Mods.
As posted earlier can we revise this thread to read/or include Coaching Staff Speculation 2022-23, now that we hired Archie.
Since we already started the discussion on this thread.
As posted earlier can we revise this thread to read/or include Coaching Staff Speculation 2022-23, now that we hired Archie.
Since we already started the discussion on this thread.
-
- Jeff Kent
- Posts: 189
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 191
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
LolSimpleJack wrote: ↑2 years ago A ton of you are very high on him but I’m not sure I agree on wanting Holloway. He hasn’t had a truly impressive season yet, losing double digit games every year and never winning more than 70% of conference games in a season. And that’s in the MAAC over four seasons. Two 14-6 seasons in conference separated by a 10-8 season in between is a little concerning to me, you should be consistently dominating a conference like that if you’re actually above the level that you’re coaching at. It begs the question if the hype on Holloway would be the same if not for Rider doing the dirty work and knocking out Iona so that SPU could get the auto bid. IMO this is not the next Hurley situation, Hurley had Wagner on a dominant level by his second year. The signs were there that Hurley was a difference maker. I could be way off but I think with Holloway we would be closer to Jim Baron level teams than Dan Hurley teams, which would be an upgrade to our current state but not where I think any of us want to be.
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4853
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 3160
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
This aged well…Backroads wrote: ↑2 years agoLolSimpleJack wrote: ↑2 years ago A ton of you are very high on him but I’m not sure I agree on wanting Holloway. He hasn’t had a truly impressive season yet, losing double digit games every year and never winning more than 70% of conference games in a season. And that’s in the MAAC over four seasons. Two 14-6 seasons in conference separated by a 10-8 season in between is a little concerning to me, you should be consistently dominating a conference like that if you’re actually above the level that you’re coaching at. It begs the question if the hype on Holloway would be the same if not for Rider doing the dirty work and knocking out Iona so that SPU could get the auto bid. IMO this is not the next Hurley situation, Hurley had Wagner on a dominant level by his second year. The signs were there that Hurley was a difference maker. I could be way off but I think with Holloway we would be closer to Jim Baron level teams than Dan Hurley teams, which would be an upgrade to our current state but not where I think any of us want to be.
Bleed Keaney Blue!
”I'm not coming there to be in the top 3 of the Atlantic 10. I'm coming to win the damn thing!”
”I'm not coming there to be in the top 3 of the Atlantic 10. I'm coming to win the damn thing!”
-
- Frenchy Tomlin
- Posts: 22
- Joined: 2 years ago
- x 29
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
It hasn’t even aged yet. Patience, it’s not good practice to look at a sample size of three games and be result oriented. It was an extremely impressive run and I like Holloway’s chances a lot more now than I did when I wrote that, but to assume he’s now just guaranteed success is being a prisoner of the moment. The range of outcomes for him is still very wide, it’s not going to be a surprise four years down the line if we hear he is extended or if we hear is let go. Not saying I’d bet against him but there is still plenty to prove.steviep123 wrote: ↑2 years agoThis aged well…Backroads wrote: ↑2 years agoLolSimpleJack wrote: ↑2 years ago A ton of you are very high on him but I’m not sure I agree on wanting Holloway. He hasn’t had a truly impressive season yet, losing double digit games every year and never winning more than 70% of conference games in a season. And that’s in the MAAC over four seasons. Two 14-6 seasons in conference separated by a 10-8 season in between is a little concerning to me, you should be consistently dominating a conference like that if you’re actually above the level that you’re coaching at. It begs the question if the hype on Holloway would be the same if not for Rider doing the dirty work and knocking out Iona so that SPU could get the auto bid. IMO this is not the next Hurley situation, Hurley had Wagner on a dominant level by his second year. The signs were there that Hurley was a difference maker. I could be way off but I think with Holloway we would be closer to Jim Baron level teams than Dan Hurley teams, which would be an upgrade to our current state but not where I think any of us want to be.
-
- Tom Garrick
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 869
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
1. Coaches are hired to be fired, if you haven't noticed. So of course, he could flame out in 4 years. So too did a guy named Archie Miller at IU. Does that make him an unqualified coach?SimpleJack wrote: ↑2 years agoIt hasn’t even aged yet. Patience, it’s not good practice to look at a sample size of three games and be result oriented. It was an extremely impressive run and I like Holloway’s chances a lot more now than I did when I wrote that, but to assume he’s now just guaranteed success is being a prisoner of the moment. The range of outcomes for him is still very wide, it’s not going to be a surprise four years down the line if we hear he is extended or if we hear is let go. Not saying I’d bet against him but there is still plenty to prove.
2. Your previous "critique" of Holloway was missing a whole bunch of context. The guy was coaching at St. Peter's, for Pete's sake!! He lost double-digit games. So what, you expected the Peacocks to beat PC, St. John's and VCU? He was 14-6 competing against conference foes while having the smallest budget and worst facilities. Winning 70% of conference games is pretty impressive. A St. Peter's coach needs to be dominating the MAAC to prove he's a good coach? Get real.
I'm not saying he's the second coming of John Wooden but I do know that winning college basketball games is a hard job...and winning at a place like St. Peter's is even harder.
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 7845
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: narragansett
- x 4313
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
…….I thought many think Iona was gonna run away with the MAAC and the rest in the wake…
Last edited by section(105) 2 years ago, edited 1 time in total.
Ram logo via Grist 1938
-
- Frenchy Tomlin
- Posts: 22
- Joined: 2 years ago
- x 29
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
You’re implying something I never said in that first part but fair enough on the rest of it. I respect the broad perspective, I admittedly didn’t know SPU had the smallest budget and worst facilities in the MAAC. Makes me give him slightly more of a pass for never winning a regular season conference title in that quality conference.PlayMikeMotenMore wrote: ↑2 years ago1. Coaches are hired to be fired, if you haven't noticed. So of course, he could flame out in 4 years. So too did a guy named Archie Miller at IU. Does that make him an unqualified coach?SimpleJack wrote: ↑2 years agoIt hasn’t even aged yet. Patience, it’s not good practice to look at a sample size of three games and be result oriented. It was an extremely impressive run and I like Holloway’s chances a lot more now than I did when I wrote that, but to assume he’s now just guaranteed success is being a prisoner of the moment. The range of outcomes for him is still very wide, it’s not going to be a surprise four years down the line if we hear he is extended or if we hear is let go. Not saying I’d bet against him but there is still plenty to prove.
2. Your previous "critique" of Holloway was missing a whole bunch of context. The guy was coaching at St. Peter's, for Pete's sake!! He lost double-digit games. So what, you expected the Peacocks to beat PC, St. John's and VCU? He was 14-6 competing against conference foes while having the smallest budget and worst facilities. Winning 70% of conference games is pretty impressive. A St. Peter's coach needs to be dominating the MAAC to prove he's a good coach? Get real.
I'm not saying he's the second coming of John Wooden but I do know that winning college basketball games is a hard job...and winning at a place like St. Peter's is even harder.
So I’m curious because I don’t know the answer to this… was Wagner a powerhouse/high budget program in the NEC when Hurley was able to make them into a 25 win team and go 15-3 (83% win percentage) in conference in just his second season? And if so how much of his success there do you credit to that?
-
- Tom Garrick
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 869
Re: Head coach speculation for 2022-23
I don't know if there is such a thing as "high budget" in the NEC. Wagner has been to 1 NCAA tournament in its Division One historySimpleJack wrote: ↑2 years agoYou’re implying something I never said in that first part but fair enough on the rest of it. I respect the broad perspective, I admittedly didn’t know SPU had the smallest budget and worst facilities in the MAAC. Makes me give him slightly more of a pass for never winning a regular season conference title in that quality conference.PlayMikeMotenMore wrote: ↑2 years ago1. Coaches are hired to be fired, if you haven't noticed. So of course, he could flame out in 4 years. So too did a guy named Archie Miller at IU. Does that make him an unqualified coach?SimpleJack wrote: ↑2 years ago
It hasn’t even aged yet. Patience, it’s not good practice to look at a sample size of three games and be result oriented. It was an extremely impressive run and I like Holloway’s chances a lot more now than I did when I wrote that, but to assume he’s now just guaranteed success is being a prisoner of the moment. The range of outcomes for him is still very wide, it’s not going to be a surprise four years down the line if we hear he is extended or if we hear is let go. Not saying I’d bet against him but there is still plenty to prove.
2. Your previous "critique" of Holloway was missing a whole bunch of context. The guy was coaching at St. Peter's, for Pete's sake!! He lost double-digit games. So what, you expected the Peacocks to beat PC, St. John's and VCU? He was 14-6 competing against conference foes while having the smallest budget and worst facilities. Winning 70% of conference games is pretty impressive. A St. Peter's coach needs to be dominating the MAAC to prove he's a good coach? Get real.
I'm not saying he's the second coming of John Wooden but I do know that winning college basketball games is a hard job...and winning at a place like St. Peter's is even harder.
So I’m curious because I don’t know the answer to this… was Wagner a powerhouse/high budget program in the NEC when Hurley was able to make them into a 25 win team and go 15-3 (83% win percentage) in conference in just his second season? And if so how much of his success there do you credit to that?