“When going someplace new you should always bring a towel!” -Towelie
I actually owned the talking towelie back when I was living in Bonnet finishing my degree. Always fun a parties.
“When going someplace new you should always bring a towel!” -Towelie
No. It’s still awfulPeterRamTime wrote: ↑2 years ago Does the new Ram logo suddenly look better to anyone else now for some *Archie Miller* reason?
Admit itsteviep123 wrote: ↑2 years agoNo. It’s still awfulPeterRamTime wrote: ↑2 years ago Does the new Ram logo suddenly look better to anyone else now for some *Archie Miller* reason?
I remember that run and they beat us in the A10 semis in a warBlue Man wrote: ↑2 years agoProbably Archie’s best coaching job. Maybe Cooley’s worst.reef wrote: ↑2 years agoArch and Ed also squared off in the NCAAT round of 64 in 2015 Dayton wonBlue Man wrote: ↑2 years ago
My two year old son is much more like his dad and likes to run around places, he was watching the presser with his grandma. My daughter is perfect (takes after her mom) and can handle events like that.
Ed and Archie coached together on the USA U-19 world championship team when he was still at Dayton and spent a month together in Greece, along with their families. Then won gold there as well.
They became very close as a result of that. They also coached against each other in Maui (Archie's Hoosiers beat the brakes off of Cooley's Friars ). Ironically Al Durham dropped 19 against PC that day.
Despite what a few less-informed fans on here think, Ed's a great dude and has been very good to URI's last 2 head coaches with support and help throughout recruiting season.
6 Dayton players had schollys that game. They won 4 straight in the A10 and had to play again on Tuesday. No player taller than Kendall Pollard at 6’6.
My main point was that since they became friends after the USA coaching stint, Archie never lost his edge competing against him
Agree but if they were going to devote all their attention and energy to one project or the other, I’m glad they fucked up the logo thing and not the coaching search. Win some lose some.steviep123 wrote: ↑2 years agoNo. It’s still awfulPeterRamTime wrote: ↑2 years ago Does the new Ram logo suddenly look better to anyone else now for some *Archie Miller* reason?
Wasn't it the Stanford game where Hurls pulled a world class nutty on the officials? Waving his jacket around, losing it?reef wrote: ↑2 years agoI remember that run and they beat us in the A10 semis in a warBlue Man wrote: ↑2 years agoProbably Archie’s best coaching job. Maybe Cooley’s worst.
6 Dayton players had schollys that game. They won 4 straight in the A10 and had to play again on Tuesday. No player taller than Kendall Pollard at 6’6.
My main point was that since they became friends after the USA coaching stint, Archie never lost his edge competing against him
We lost to Stanford in the NIT after we won a game
If the students take the 100s they’d have to move some season ticket holders, right?Da_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑2 years agoMaybe they'll finally uphold their end of the bargain they told us students back when they started charging each student the Ryan Center fee in their tuition and make the 100 bowl all students...Sweep The Leg wrote: ↑2 years ago Archie killed it today. Wore the right thing, said the right things, perfect first impression.
I loved the boots on the ground attitude about getting buzz around the team and students to games.
Maybe they'll be a change in seating for the students behind the bench again. College basketball should be a student experience. The more they're engaged, the better our home court advantage.
We now have the 2 best basketball coaches in the A-10.
I know, not holding my breath
Yes, and rightfully so. That was a hose job and a half.NYGFan_Section208 wrote: ↑2 years agoWasn't it the Stanford game where Hurls pulled a world class nutty on the officials? Waving his jacket around, losing it?reef wrote: ↑2 years agoI remember that run and they beat us in the A10 semis in a warBlue Man wrote: ↑2 years ago
Probably Archie’s best coaching job. Maybe Cooley’s worst.
6 Dayton players had schollys that game. They won 4 straight in the A10 and had to play again on Tuesday. No player taller than Kendall Pollard at 6’6.
My main point was that since they became friends after the USA coaching stint, Archie never lost his edge competing against him
We lost to Stanford in the NIT after we won a game
YES, we are in 104. But I believe the reason they did not want students in this section is because we share the section with visiting team family. I guess there were several complaints in the past.RhodyRams916 wrote: ↑2 years agoIf the students take the 100s they’d have to move some season ticket holders, right?Da_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑2 years agoMaybe they'll finally uphold their end of the bargain they told us students back when they started charging each student the Ryan Center fee in their tuition and make the 100 bowl all students...Sweep The Leg wrote: ↑2 years ago Archie killed it today. Wore the right thing, said the right things, perfect first impression.
I loved the boots on the ground attitude about getting buzz around the team and students to games.
Maybe they'll be a change in seating for the students behind the bench again. College basketball should be a student experience. The more they're engaged, the better our home court advantage.
We now have the 2 best basketball coaches in the A-10.
I know, not holding my breath
Oh i know it'll never happen, just still bitter they took our money then never delivered their end of the dealRhodyRams916 wrote: ↑2 years agoIf the students take the 100s they’d have to move some season ticket holders, right?Da_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑2 years agoMaybe they'll finally uphold their end of the bargain they told us students back when they started charging each student the Ryan Center fee in their tuition and make the 100 bowl all students...Sweep The Leg wrote: ↑2 years ago Archie killed it today. Wore the right thing, said the right things, perfect first impression.
I loved the boots on the ground attitude about getting buzz around the team and students to games.
Maybe they'll be a change in seating for the students behind the bench again. College basketball should be a student experience. The more they're engaged, the better our home court advantage.
We now have the 2 best basketball coaches in the A-10.
I know, not holding my breath
A. I didn't know it was our job to make the opposing team and fans feel nice and comfy.LoveThoseRams wrote: ↑2 years agoYES, we are in 104. But I believe the reason they did not want students in this section is because we share the section with visiting team family. I guess there were several complaints in the past.RhodyRams916 wrote: ↑2 years agoIf the students take the 100s they’d have to move some season ticket holders, right?Da_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑2 years ago
Maybe they'll finally uphold their end of the bargain they told us students back when they started charging each student the Ryan Center fee in their tuition and make the 100 bowl all students...
I know, not holding my breath
It would look GREAT on TV if students were put in the 100s. I think it should happen.Da_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑2 years agoOh i know it'll never happen, just still bitter they took our money then never delivered their end of the dealRhodyRams916 wrote: ↑2 years agoIf the students take the 100s they’d have to move some season ticket holders, right?Da_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑2 years ago
Maybe they'll finally uphold their end of the bargain they told us students back when they started charging each student the Ryan Center fee in their tuition and make the 100 bowl all students...
I know, not holding my breath
I don’t disagree and would gladly move....if the seats were filled. The way the students have been turning out the past 4 years, we couldn’t count on that.RhowdyRam02 wrote: ↑2 years agoA. I didn't know it was our job to make the opposing team and fans feel nice and comfy.LoveThoseRams wrote: ↑2 years agoYES, we are in 104. But I believe the reason they did not want students in this section is because we share the section with visiting team family. I guess there were several complaints in the past.RhodyRams916 wrote: ↑2 years ago
If the students take the 100s they’d have to move some season ticket holders, right?
B. Then the students should have been moved to the opposite sideline instead of being shoved into the end zone seats no one wanted
And it would provide the home court atmosphere Archie was talking about yesterdayRhodyRams916 wrote: ↑2 years agoIt would look GREAT on TV if students were put in the 100s. I think it should happen.Da_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑2 years agoOh i know it'll never happen, just still bitter they took our money then never delivered their end of the dealRhodyRams916 wrote: ↑2 years ago
If the students take the 100s they’d have to move some season ticket holders, right?
In fairness we couldn't count on anyone turning out in those seatsLoveThoseRams wrote: ↑2 years agoI don’t disagree and would gladly move....if the seats were filled. The way the students have been turning out the past 4 years, we couldn’t count on that.RhowdyRam02 wrote: ↑2 years agoA. I didn't know it was our job to make the opposing team and fans feel nice and comfy.LoveThoseRams wrote: ↑2 years ago
YES, we are in 104. But I believe the reason they did not want students in this section is because we share the section with visiting team family. I guess there were several complaints in the past.
B. Then the students should have been moved to the opposite sideline instead of being shoved into the end zone seats no one wanted
How about the students get the 3 sections opposite the benches, 110, 111 and 112. Those go to the hard core Ruckus members. The casual students can still have some of the sections they currently have 101, 102, 114 etc., however many sections it takes to get to that 1500 number of seats set aside for students. The season ticket holder from 110, 111 and 112 then get 1st choice of where they want to move, across the other side to 103, 104, 105, 106 or some of the prime 200 sections. I sit in 211. I'm willing to move to a slightly less desirable section to make this happen.RhowdyRam02 wrote: ↑2 years agoA. I didn't know it was our job to make the opposing team and fans feel nice and comfy.LoveThoseRams wrote: ↑2 years agoYES, we are in 104. But I believe the reason they did not want students in this section is because we share the section with visiting team family. I guess there were several complaints in the past.RhodyRams916 wrote: ↑2 years ago
If the students take the 100s they’d have to move some season ticket holders, right?
B. Then the students should have been moved to the opposite sideline instead of being shoved into the end zone seats no one wanted
To be fair the students were great for the Bryant, BC and BU games this season and then we know happened from there lol…LoveThoseRams wrote: ↑2 years agoI don’t disagree and would gladly move....if the seats were filled. The way the students have been turning out the past 4 years, we couldn’t count on that.RhowdyRam02 wrote: ↑2 years agoA. I didn't know it was our job to make the opposing team and fans feel nice and comfy.LoveThoseRams wrote: ↑2 years ago
YES, we are in 104. But I believe the reason they did not want students in this section is because we share the section with visiting team family. I guess there were several complaints in the past.
B. Then the students should have been moved to the opposite sideline instead of being shoved into the end zone seats no one wanted
Someone email the ruckus about this immediately
I like that idea, but would still prefer to just put the students behind the benches since that’s where the main camera is pointing.Billyboy78 wrote: ↑2 years agoHow about the students get the 3 sections opposite the benches, 110, 111 and 112. Those go to the hard core Ruckus members. The casual students can still have some of the sections they currently have 101, 102, 114 etc., however many sections it takes to get to that 1500 number of seats set aside for students. The season ticket holder from 110, 111 and 112 then get 1st choice of where they want to move, across the other side to 103, 104, 105, 106 or some of the prime 200 sections. I sit in 211. I'm willing to move to a slightly less desirable section to make this happen.RhowdyRam02 wrote: ↑2 years agoA. I didn't know it was our job to make the opposing team and fans feel nice and comfy.LoveThoseRams wrote: ↑2 years ago
YES, we are in 104. But I believe the reason they did not want students in this section is because we share the section with visiting team family. I guess there were several complaints in the past.
B. Then the students should have been moved to the opposite sideline instead of being shoved into the end zone seats no one wanted
Do you remember when (what year) students were removed from 103,104,105,106? I don’t honestly remember.LoveThoseRams wrote: ↑2 years agoYES, we are in 104. But I believe the reason they did not want students in this section is because we share the section with visiting team family. I guess there were several complaints in the past.RhodyRams916 wrote: ↑2 years agoIf the students take the 100s they’d have to move some season ticket holders, right?Da_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑2 years ago
Maybe they'll finally uphold their end of the bargain they told us students back when they started charging each student the Ryan Center fee in their tuition and make the 100 bowl all students...
I know, not holding my breath
My original gripe is from when the Ryan Center got built. They added a fee to every student's tuition to help pay for the cost of the Ryan Center with the promise that student tickets would be wrapped around the court in the 100s to "be like Duke".ramster wrote: ↑2 years agoDo you remember when (what year) students were removed from 103,104,105,106? I don’t honestly remember.LoveThoseRams wrote: ↑2 years agoYES, we are in 104. But I believe the reason they did not want students in this section is because we share the section with visiting team family. I guess there were several complaints in the past.RhodyRams916 wrote: ↑2 years ago
If the students take the 100s they’d have to move some season ticket holders, right?
These are some of the most expensive seats. Even when we were playing to small crowds the past couple months most games were sold out. Some singles remained but Dayton, Davidson no tix available. They go for $45, $50, $55 depending on the opponent, day or whatever makes them different price.
So that would be less ticket revenue as students are the same cost regardless of where they sit.
In relocating season ticket holders out of 103, 104, 105, 106 where would they go? I’m sure upstairs but would they bump other season ticket holders out of their seats? Or just go to best available? How would it be fair to the displaced people?
At PC students are at both ends of the court.
At many college basketball games I see students are at the ends making crazy acts to impact the opponents FT Shooters. Last Davidson game 30 guys were in speedo bathing suites to distract the FTs.
Would be interesting to know how many D1 schools give students the best seats in the building. I do not know.
This subject comes up often. Maybe Scott Brand can set up a podcast with whoever can best answer seating questions and philosophy. We provide questions as always. WI-FI, replays, quality of food, students behind the benches and in 100 level sections pros and cons and why / when was the change made.
PC and UCONN have seat Licenses, like many NFL teams have.
Seat map is not accurate as 110 and part of 111 are used for media now.
9B7D1136-EF69-4E77-A8AA-0B9B178E04BD.jpeg
I understand. I'm just wondering how you fix that.Da_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑2 years ago
My original gripe is from when the Ryan Center got built. They added a fee to every student's tuition to help pay for the cost of the Ryan Center with the promise that student tickets would be wrapped around the court in the 100s to "be like Duke".
Oh I don't expect it to get fixed, my comment was more tongue in cheek than anything.ramster wrote: ↑2 years agoI understand. I'm just wondering how you fix that.Da_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑2 years ago
My original gripe is from when the Ryan Center got built. They added a fee to every student's tuition to help pay for the cost of the Ryan Center with the promise that student tickets would be wrapped around the court in the 100s to "be like Duke".
This issue that the students paid for those seats comes up every year on this board. So we should go to the right person(s) to explain why the decision was made and can it be reversed. Could also explain what other schools do and how much revenue would be lost by displacing the season ticket holders currently in the 100 level seating.
Scott Brand,
Is it possible to schedule someone from Ticketing / Marketing to explain the seating philosophy, reason for the change, reserved seating of family/recruits, media, friends, VIP's behind both Home and Visitor Benches?
Is there a link to the presser somewhere?
Blueman?Da_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑2 years agoOh I don't expect it to get fixed, my comment was more tongue in cheek than anything.ramster wrote: ↑2 years agoI understand. I'm just wondering how you fix that.Da_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑2 years ago
My original gripe is from when the Ryan Center got built. They added a fee to every student's tuition to help pay for the cost of the Ryan Center with the promise that student tickets would be wrapped around the court in the 100s to "be like Duke".
This issue that the students paid for those seats comes up every year on this board. So we should go to the right person(s) to explain why the decision was made and can it be reversed. Could also explain what other schools do and how much revenue would be lost by displacing the season ticket holders currently in the 100 level seating.
Scott Brand,
Is it possible to schedule someone from Ticketing / Marketing to explain the seating philosophy, reason for the change, reserved seating of family/recruits, media, friends, VIP's behind both Home and Visitor Benches?
The mob being moved out of the 100s was a whole other fiasco that Blueman can better give the history on.
Yeah, he was one of the ones running The Mob back then and can better comment on the behind the scenes drama between the school and a certain member of the athletic department back thenramster wrote: ↑2 years agoBlueman?Da_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑2 years agoOh I don't expect it to get fixed, my comment was more tongue in cheek than anything.ramster wrote: ↑2 years ago
I understand. I'm just wondering how you fix that.
This issue that the students paid for those seats comes up every year on this board. So we should go to the right person(s) to explain why the decision was made and can it be reversed. Could also explain what other schools do and how much revenue would be lost by displacing the season ticket holders currently in the 100 level seating.
Scott Brand,
Is it possible to schedule someone from Ticketing / Marketing to explain the seating philosophy, reason for the change, reserved seating of family/recruits, media, friends, VIP's behind both Home and Visitor Benches?
The mob being moved out of the 100s was a whole other fiasco that Blueman can better give the history on.
Thank-you!Rhody15 wrote: ↑2 years ago
One question though. Do you still think PC should fire Cooley?
Thank-you!ElmCityRhody wrote: ↑2 years agohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_j7QFsgZhU
Not going to re-hash all of that since I just feel too damn good about things at URI.Da_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑2 years agoYeah, he was one of the ones running The Mob back then and can better comment on the behind the scenes drama between the school and a certain member of the athletic department back thenramster wrote: ↑2 years agoBlueman?Da_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑2 years ago
Oh I don't expect it to get fixed, my comment was more tongue in cheek than anything.
The mob being moved out of the 100s was a whole other fiasco that Blueman can better give the history on.
Even if you think he should be fired they will never do that to him and this run will buy him countless time nowdaytonflyerfan wrote: ↑2 years agoThank-you!
Cooley IMO, has a similar resume to Rick Barnes when Barnes was at Texas, and Barnes was ultimately fired by Texas.
At Texas: 17 years...16 ncaat appearances...6 round of 64's...5 round of 32's...2 Sweet 16's...2 Elite 8's...1 Final 4
Cooley at PC...11 years...1 first four...3 round of 64's...1 round of 32...1 at least Sweet 16...2 nit's...another ncaat appearance during the covid-cancelled season.
The point that I was making is that both coaches were good during the regular season but had trouble in the ncaat, and fans get restless after a while.
Cooley has 6 ncaat appearances, but has made it to the round of 32 once and the Sweet 16 once, and IMO, he has reached his ceiling there and should be fired. Maybe he will change my mind with this year's performance.
oh man, I'm so high.ATPTourFan wrote: ↑2 years ago“When going someplace new you should always bring a towel!” -Towelie
I actually owned the talking towelie back when I was living in Bonnet finishing my degree. Always fun a parties.
1EAF587A-DF2A-4171-8DDD-BD2B37E63540.jpeg
You keep saying "give". The students aren't being given anything, they are paying for the seats they've been displaced from. That was the deal, students would pay one third the cost of the Ryan Center over 30 years for those seats. The students are paying, athletics isn't living up to their end of the bargainramster wrote: ↑2 years agoDo you remember when (what year) students were removed from 103,104,105,106? I don’t honestly remember.LoveThoseRams wrote: ↑2 years agoYES, we are in 104. But I believe the reason they did not want students in this section is because we share the section with visiting team family. I guess there were several complaints in the past.RhodyRams916 wrote: ↑2 years ago
If the students take the 100s they’d have to move some season ticket holders, right?
These are some of the most expensive seats. Even when we were playing to small crowds the past couple months most games were sold out. Some singles remained but Dayton, Davidson no tix available. They go for $45, $50, $55 depending on the opponent, day or whatever makes them different price.
So that would be less ticket revenue as students are the same cost regardless of where they sit.
In relocating season ticket holders out of 103, 104, 105, 106 where would they go? I’m sure upstairs but would they bump other season ticket holders out of their seats? Or just go to best available? How would it be fair to the displaced people?
At PC students are at both ends of the court.
At many college basketball games I see students are at the ends making crazy acts to impact the opponents FT Shooters. Last Davidson game 30 guys were in speedo bathing suites to distract the FTs.
Would be interesting to know how many D1 schools give students the best seats in the building. I do not know.
This subject comes up often. Maybe Scott Brand can set up a podcast with whoever can best answer seating questions and philosophy. We provide questions as always. WI-FI, replays, quality of food, students behind the benches and in 100 level sections pros and cons and why / when was the change made.
PC and UCONN have seat Licenses, like many NFL teams have.
Seat map is not accurate as 110 and part of 111 are used for media now.
9B7D1136-EF69-4E77-A8AA-0B9B178E04BD.jpeg