Rhody15 wrote: ↑3 years ago
Obadiah wrote: ↑3 years ago
With more than half the season gone, we now know this team has an identity - inconsistent, lacks heart, no clutch, poor shooters.
3 players over 40% from 3, one play at 38%.
Also 6 players over 70% from the line, with two over 80%.
So I wouldn’t say poor shooters.
It just seems like we do because our worst shooter is taking the most shots.
Actually to rephrase my point, i would add poor ball control and poor shooting. Rhody15, You don't see that because you are obsessed with "average" stats when a deeper look is always better. Point 1, FG shooting went from 42% in 1H to 33% in 2H, 3FG from 31% to 0%, and FT from 83% to 70%. But even those stats do not tell the story. What good is it that the average 3PT shooting is 32.7% when in the 2H it was 0-7.
The Duquesne game went south at the 14+ min. mark when URI had a 14 point lead. Watching this game on ESPN+, by the eight minute mark you could see in the URI body language that this game could be lost. Yes, URI had lower TO's stat in this game 13 TO's, but 8 of them, all four by Fatts, occurred in that last 14 minute span.That extrapolates to an over 20 TO game rate. Ditto for the shooting and the shooters. In URI's eight losses and even some wins, e.g. St Joe's, what you see is the TO's, the poor shooting, the low confidence in critical phases all of which are not reflecting in the "average stats".
In summary, let me say again - "that the average depth of the river is 3 feet, is totally irrelevant to the the family of the person who drowned in the 10 foot section".