Ouch. He's a great player
A10 Outlook for 2022-23
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4842
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 6487
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
ATTITUDE IS EVERYTHING
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 15111
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5371
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Sounds like last year was their final go round doubt anyone of the 5 return
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4227
- Joined: 2 years ago
- x 2092
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Seems as though the A10 schools, as well as other high mid-majors, are right in the sweet spot for players to move up or down in conference. For this year, anyway.
I suspect it won’t be as bad next year due to the upgrade in coaches. I hope it works out that way.
I suspect it won’t be as bad next year due to the upgrade in coaches. I hope it works out that way.
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 7797
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Rhode Island
- x 6579
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
When the free Covid year is finally done being used, my guess is the transfer number will go down then as well.
Go Rhody
-
- Tom Garrick
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: 6 years ago
- x 920
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
There’s gonna be a long line for him
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: 4 years ago
- x 4077
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Well the iron 5 are probably all gone.
-
- Art Stephenson
- Posts: 859
- Joined: 7 years ago
- Location: Gansett
- x 1017
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Bonnie's add darryl banks from st Peter's
Losing Osun Osunniyi..kyle lofton...Jaren holmes...and Dominick welch to transfer....and jalen adaway to starting a pro career. End of an era and Bonnie's could be down next few years.
Losing Osun Osunniyi..kyle lofton...Jaren holmes...and Dominick welch to transfer....and jalen adaway to starting a pro career. End of an era and Bonnie's could be down next few years.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 15111
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5371
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Yes I thought that would happen they gave one last go round and it @ least got them to the NIT final time for them to do the next chapter
-
- Tyson Wheeler
- Posts: 7437
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 3942
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
“We will be good when we are good.”
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10536
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 7654
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 9960
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 7774
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
It's incredible how gullible people are.
-
- Cuttino Mobley
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 1965
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: 4 years ago
- x 4077
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Seems like Osun and Lofton want to be a packaged deal.
Preferably a high major, not sure they can make that happen.
Preferably a high major, not sure they can make that happen.
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 9960
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 7774
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
We got room for both!!
-
- Art Stephenson
- Posts: 768
- Joined: 6 years ago
- x 844
-
- Art Stephenson
- Posts: 768
- Joined: 6 years ago
- x 844
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
get ready for a couple kids to get bumped from a P5 school to make room for Lofton and Osunniyi.
All of a sudden, kids that were 8th and 9th on the bench who were good enough to stay put will be not so gently pushed out. This is when things start to get ugly. Literally days before the portal deadline. And I'm not sure I can blame a P5 coach, I think I blame Lofton and Osunniyi for waiting so long to make this decision with their "wish list". I am still trying to figure out how I feel about New College Basketball.
All of a sudden, kids that were 8th and 9th on the bench who were good enough to stay put will be not so gently pushed out. This is when things start to get ugly. Literally days before the portal deadline. And I'm not sure I can blame a P5 coach, I think I blame Lofton and Osunniyi for waiting so long to make this decision with their "wish list". I am still trying to figure out how I feel about New College Basketball.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 12604
- Joined: 8 years ago
- x 6808
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Um.... where it gets "ugly" is probably right at the intersection of "where it gets good for URI"phipsiGD'11 wrote: ↑2 years ago get ready for a couple kids to get bumped from a P5 school to make room for Lofton and Osunniyi.
All of a sudden, kids that were 8th and 9th on the bench who were good enough to stay put will be not so gently pushed out. This is when things start to get ugly. Literally days before the portal deadline. And I'm not sure I can blame a P5 coach, I think I blame Lofton and Osunniyi for waiting so long to make this decision with their "wish list". I am still trying to figure out how I feel about New College Basketball.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 24363
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9175
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: 4 years ago
- x 4077
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
They will probably also add AJ Green who is in the portal and currently in the draft.
He may be the top guard left in the transfer portal.
His father Kyle is an assistant coach at Iowa State.
Iowa State is poaching the A10.
They also got Ward from VCU.
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4853
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 3160
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Can’t beat ‘em join em
Bleed Keaney Blue!
”I'm not coming there to be in the top 3 of the Atlantic 10. I'm coming to win the damn thing!”
”I'm not coming there to be in the top 3 of the Atlantic 10. I'm coming to win the damn thing!”
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 15111
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5371
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
I can see all these Bonnie’s transfers going P6
-
- Art Stephenson
- Posts: 859
- Joined: 7 years ago
- Location: Gansett
- x 1017
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: 4 years ago
- x 4077
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
As long as that 16th member would be beneficial.
Now the discussion/debate would be if we do expand which program would make the most sense.
I would have liked Belmont or Murray State, but they are headed to the MVC.
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 12604
- Joined: 8 years ago
- x 6808
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Georgetown?
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: 4 years ago
- x 4077
-
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 2754
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 2622
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
We'd still be better off if we could lose a couple first
Proudly supplying the Internet with online wisecracks, impertinent comments and loathing of all things mental hospital since 1996.
-
- Cuttino Mobley
- Posts: 2032
- Joined: 5 years ago
- x 1459
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Agreed. Why would we want to add more teams to the A-10? It is already a watered down league. I know it won't happen, but would love to get rid of Duquense, Fordham and LaSalle.
-
- Tom Garrick
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: 6 years ago
- x 920
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 15111
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5371
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Who would be good fits for the 16 th team ??
-
- Cuttino Mobley
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 1965
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
I think the markets argument doesn't apply in 2022 now that college basketball is nationally covered. Besides, who in NYC covers Fordham? Who in NYC even follows Fordham? If anyone in NYC, other than alums, follows college basketball, they very likely root for St. John's. Fordham can leave too.Dino611 wrote: ↑2 years agoGet rid of La Salle & Duquesne , we have to keep GW & Fordham for their markets
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 24363
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 9175
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Jeff Borzello summary for all P6 teams plus 20 additional teams including 5 A10 teams:
Davidson
Dayton
Loyola Chicago
St Louis
VCU
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-baske ... rs-2022-23
Davidson
Dayton
Loyola Chicago
St Louis
VCU
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-baske ... rs-2022-23
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4459
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Houston, TX (via Charlestown, RI)
- x 3106
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
I think if the "better" schools in the A10 could knock a couple of the lesser ones out, they would. That it hasn't happened in 20+ years suggests to me that it's very hard or impossible to do with the bylaws. So, might as well add one to get to 16 - which is probably easier for a slew of scheduling and logistical issues.
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4916
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 2513
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
And if the 16th school is a strong program it will further dilute the impact of the weaker schools.SGreenwell wrote: ↑2 years ago I think if the "better" schools in the A10 could knock a couple of the lesser ones out, they would. That it hasn't happened in 20+ years suggests to me that it's very hard or impossible to do with the bylaws. So, might as well add one to get to 16 - which is probably easier for a slew of scheduling and logistical issues.
Slava Ukraini!
-
- Tyson Wheeler
- Posts: 7486
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Rhode Island
- x 4040
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Wouldn't this mean more conference games? The article already mentioned how extended in conference play has made it more difficult to build resumes. Needs to be a really solid program with history.
GO RAMS
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: 4 years ago
- x 4077
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
It is also becoming more difficult to add favorable OOC games against P6 schools.Rhodymob05 wrote: ↑2 years ago Wouldn't this mean more conference games? The article already mentioned how extended in conference play has made it more difficult to build resumes. Needs to be a really solid program with history.
-
- Lamar Odom
- Posts: 315
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 335
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Speculation: with so many leagues expanding in numbers and regular season games, and the ever-increasing difficulty in scheduling good non-conference games outside of neutral site tournaments, a move to 16 teams would allow for 22 regular season games. Two 8 team divisions. H and H within your division, and single games against each team in the other division. Thoughts?
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10403
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 6667
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Fordham garners a lot of NY attention eh? How come their bleachers are empty?Dino611 wrote: ↑2 years agoGet rid of La Salle & Duquesne , we have to keep GW & Fordham for their markets
Take down the Robert Carothers banner and fix the concession stand lines
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 8908
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 10020
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Ideally a league like the A10 would have more fluid conference scheduling. Pairing up the top 8 "predicted" teams in round robin to increase odds for tourney bids. Having locked "divisions" leaves too much for chance and if it was regionally based would leave Rhody in a league with all the Philly schools, Umass, Fordham and Duquesne possibly. No thank you.NHRamFan wrote: ↑2 years ago Speculation: with so many leagues expanding in numbers and regular season games, and the ever-increasing difficulty in scheduling good non-conference games outside of neutral site tournaments, a move to 16 teams would allow for 22 regular season games. Two 8 team divisions. H and H within your division, and single games against each team in the other division. Thoughts?
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 7534
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 15425
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
The "media market" argument is useless in 2022. Everyone is everywhere, streaming is everywhere, 24/7 content is everywhere.
You can throw a neutral site game anywhere you want.
That said, the league has to set up some "TBA" scheduling where the teams good teams play each other later in the year.
Maybe if we go to a 16 team league we take the bottom 8 programs mid-way through the conference schedule, and isolate them for the last 8 games a piece, and ensure they play H/H against each other. Even if they already played each other.
The reality is if you're in the bottom half of the A10, you are not in the bubble conversation. That way the top 8 can play their equals in the conference, and a loss won't kill any at-large chances.
You can throw a neutral site game anywhere you want.
That said, the league has to set up some "TBA" scheduling where the teams good teams play each other later in the year.
Maybe if we go to a 16 team league we take the bottom 8 programs mid-way through the conference schedule, and isolate them for the last 8 games a piece, and ensure they play H/H against each other. Even if they already played each other.
The reality is if you're in the bottom half of the A10, you are not in the bubble conversation. That way the top 8 can play their equals in the conference, and a loss won't kill any at-large chances.
If you say you’re a Rhody fan, I know you are my brother. For you have suffered as I have suffered.
Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
Give to Rhody's NIL
Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
Give to Rhody's NIL
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 7534
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 15425
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Great minds think alike and post the same things at the same time.bigappleram wrote: ↑2 years agoIdeally a league like the A10 would have more fluid conference scheduling. Pairing up the top 8 "predicted" teams in round robin to increase odds for tourney bids. Having locked "divisions" leaves too much for chance and if it was regionally based would leave Rhody in a league with all the Philly schools, Umass, Fordham and Duquesne possibly. No thank you.NHRamFan wrote: ↑2 years ago Speculation: with so many leagues expanding in numbers and regular season games, and the ever-increasing difficulty in scheduling good non-conference games outside of neutral site tournaments, a move to 16 teams would allow for 22 regular season games. Two 8 team divisions. H and H within your division, and single games against each team in the other division. Thoughts?
If you say you’re a Rhody fan, I know you are my brother. For you have suffered as I have suffered.
Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
Give to Rhody's NIL
Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
Give to Rhody's NIL
-
- Tyson Wheeler
- Posts: 7486
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Rhode Island
- x 4040
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
I wouldn't say the media market is completely useless. How many times does this forum complain about not wanting to pay for yet another app or it doesn't work or the game isn't available. Local media still matters and still plays a role.
GO RAMS
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 7534
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 15425
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
How many nationally televised games did Fordham have last year? 5. 4 on NBCSN, 1 on CBSSN.Rhodymob05 wrote: ↑2 years ago I wouldn't say the media market is completely useless. How many times does this forum complain about not wanting to pay for yet another app or it doesn't work or the game isn't available. Local media still matters and still plays a role.
Talk about being thrown a bone.
Powerhouse Duquesne in the mighty Pittsburgh market had 5 as well. 2 on ESPN2.
Superpower George Mason in the huge DC market had 5 games.
Perennial championship contender La Salle in the Philly market had 4 games.
That crappy Dayton school in the Dayton, OH market had 11 games on national TV.
Somehow, people found out Kingston, RI existed and URI had 11 games on national TV.
Olean, NY is a place that apparently exists and St Bonaventure had 13 games on national TV.
The rest of the schedule meters out the same way.
Good teams/good brands (we are still in the latter) will get national publicity and airtime. No matter their media market.
Bad teams/bad brands will get shit no matter what market they play in.
This isn't 1995, or 2005, or even 2015. The A10 alone used 5 different national cable channels to get games broadcast.
That doesn't include the dozens of other national channels we don't have agreements with that broadcast games. There are plenty of ways to be nationally relevant - the easiest is to just be a good program that is invested in by the school and supported by the alums. None of those ways require "being in NY" or any other media market.
If you say you’re a Rhody fan, I know you are my brother. For you have suffered as I have suffered.
Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
Give to Rhody's NIL
Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
Give to Rhody's NIL
-
- Art Stephenson
- Posts: 908
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Nashville, TN
- x 1051
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Give me Belmont! (I live in Nashville)
Wichita State
Temple
Delaware
Wichita State
Temple
Delaware
-
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 2754
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 2622
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
I'd love to get Temple back, but they and UConn have the same delusions of big-time football.
Proudly supplying the Internet with online wisecracks, impertinent comments and loathing of all things mental hospital since 1996.
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4227
- Joined: 2 years ago
- x 2092
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
I believe the two comments above make very good sense. If the A10 can’t contract, then it needs to expand by adding strong program(s) to dilute the impact of the weaker basketball programs.Rhody74 wrote: ↑2 years agoAnd if the 16th school is a strong program it will further dilute the impact of the weaker schools.SGreenwell wrote: ↑2 years ago I think if the "better" schools in the A10 could knock a couple of the lesser ones out, they would. That it hasn't happened in 20+ years suggests to me that it's very hard or impossible to do with the bylaws. So, might as well add one to get to 16 - which is probably easier for a slew of scheduling and logistical issues.
In addition, to further dilute the impacts of the weaker programs, schedule similarly to what others have previously mentioned (by having the better teams, with tourney potential, play each other twice in the conf regular season).
Makes sense to me, anyway.
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4227
- Joined: 2 years ago
- x 2092
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
As an extension to my thought process above, I believe the expansion and schedule changes will apply pressure on the programs that won’t or can’t increase their commitment to their bb program. Eventually (hopefully), said pressure forces those schools into a decision to increase their commitment to compete or leave the conference due to becoming an irrelevant program by having the tourney money and media money shares diluted. However, there is no guarantee one or more would leave.Jdrums#3 wrote: ↑2 years agoI believe the two comments above make very good sense. If the A10 can’t contract, then it needs to expand by adding strong program(s) to dilute the impact of the weaker basketball programs.Rhody74 wrote: ↑2 years agoAnd if the 16th school is a strong program it will further dilute the impact of the weaker schools.SGreenwell wrote: ↑2 years ago I think if the "better" schools in the A10 could knock a couple of the lesser ones out, they would. That it hasn't happened in 20+ years suggests to me that it's very hard or impossible to do with the bylaws. So, might as well add one to get to 16 - which is probably easier for a slew of scheduling and logistical issues.
In addition, to further dilute the impacts of the weaker programs, schedule similarly to what others have previously mentioned (by having the better teams, with tourney potential, play each other twice in the conf regular season).
Makes sense to me, anyway.
-
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 2453
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 763
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Has any member ever left the A10 to play in a less competitive conference?
On average over the last 20 years where does URI rank in the A10? Middle third?
Has the A10 seriously considered dropping members?
Has the A10 ever established more rigid standards for remaining a member?
I ask these questions because I don't believe that MOST member schools want changes. From time to time, a member will find a better opportunity and leave. So. if you are unhappy with the A10, make URI an appealing addition for a better conference.
On average over the last 20 years where does URI rank in the A10? Middle third?
Has the A10 seriously considered dropping members?
Has the A10 ever established more rigid standards for remaining a member?
I ask these questions because I don't believe that MOST member schools want changes. From time to time, a member will find a better opportunity and leave. So. if you are unhappy with the A10, make URI an appealing addition for a better conference.
NCAAs or Bust!
-
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4853
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 3160
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
Who are you and what did you do with R72's login? You are making a valid point for once.Rhody72 wrote: ↑2 years ago Has any member ever left the A10 to play in a less competitive conference?
On average over the last 20 years where does URI rank in the A10? Middle third?
Has the A10 seriously considered dropping members?
Has the A10 ever established more rigid standards for remaining a member?
I ask these questions because I don't believe that MOST member schools want changes. From time to time, a member will find a better opportunity and leave. So. if you are unhappy with the A10, make URI an appealing addition for a better conference.
Yes, URI should put themselves in a position for if and when a stronger conference calls....at the same time, the A10 should put themselves and their schools in a stronger position so that no one wants to leave if someone else comes calling.
To answer your first question, I don't think anyone left for a weaker conference. There was talk of LaSalle moving to the Patriot league a few years ago, but nothing came of it.
Bleed Keaney Blue!
”I'm not coming there to be in the top 3 of the Atlantic 10. I'm coming to win the damn thing!”
”I'm not coming there to be in the top 3 of the Atlantic 10. I'm coming to win the damn thing!”
-
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 2453
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 763
Re: A10 Outlook for 2022-23
The drop outs took away R72's login privileges for challenging conventional wisdom and she is just trolling them to get it back.steviep123 wrote: ↑2 years ago
Who are you and what did you do with R72's login? You are making a valid point for once.
NCAAs or Bust!