rhodysurf wrote: ↑4 years ago
But I mean look at UMass. They have a gorgeous practice facility and still had to hire a high school basketball coach to get high rated guys to come.
I think for many people there became this illusion that having this big, beautiful practice facility could make up for other program warts and that is not true. Players still want to play for winners, likeable coaches, etc.
If a program has had several losing seasons and an unproven coach when it comes to tournament success, a beautiful practice facility isn't going to magically land talented recruits. It might elevate their current level of recruiting slightly, but they aren't going to start big game hunting Top 100 recruits just because of it.
That said, I don't agree with this (not URI but in general)...
rhodylaw wrote: ↑4 years ago
I think I am over the need for a massive practice facility - I don’t think we are losing recruits because of it.
I do believe that if you have a recruit deciding between two schools, and he has them pretty much neck and neck with regards to prestige, coach relationship, player usage, etc., but one offers beautiful facilities and tons of additional program resources and the other lags in both areas, the recruit is choosing the first school.
However, there certainly may be some recruits that heavily weight a practice facility aspect, potential dirty recruiting about program investments, etc.
I do think that's impossible to quantify because when a recruit chooses a school he doesn't often say "I didn't choose ___ because they don't have a beautiful practice facility."