Lucrative salary? I think he is only guaranteed $300K a year. The rest is incentives and gate receipts.
So he just voluntarily walks away from it, for what?
$600K
There isn't one agent in the world that would tell his client, a college basketball coach, to walk away from a head coaching job. If there is such a case, I'm all ears...
1) Cox will not walk away.
2) 98% sure URI will not fire him at end of this season. (So yes, I'd be shocked if they do.)
3) End of year #4 will be the decision time for Thorr (even if today he already thinks he knows what the outcome of 2022 season will be). Why?
4) Because an AD who fires coaches 3 years into their contracts will have a hard time attracting a quality coach as a replacement. No coach wants to take a job knowing he may be on the hot seat after his 3rd season. The new coach's agent would negotiate a HUGE buyout clause into the contract in that case...so HUGE that URI probably could not afford it.
As I said many times the jury is till out for me on him, and I try to give him the benefit of the doubt.
I still believe the administration will give him more time, but I am feeling less and less optimistic.
Not so much about his ability to identify talent and bring them here, although we lack some pure shooters, and this game has evolved.
These late season collapses and game management/strategy is a big concern. Also the inexperience of our staff is becoming very evident.
His answers really bothered me when questioned by Morey Hershgordon. Here is a young sports reporter just trying to do his job and asked some very logical and pertinent questions. Cox on several occasions basically dissed him and that was very awkward. Not sure if he can't take a little heat or if he is only comfortable with very vanilla questions in a pre-scripted atmosphere. Regardless, it wasn't a good look.
With the loss of income because of COVID and the NCAA credits eventually running out, I don't see an increase in salaries for head coach or assistants any time soon.
I think COVID and the non-traditional season will be cover, and most will get a pass for this season...except Jimmy at BC, but he was there for 7 seasons.
I'm very disapointed in the way the season played out, but i'm glad we at least had one. It was nice until about 10 games ago when it became obvious the coach was clueless about the actual coaching part. He is a recruiter and that's it. Nothing wrong with that as said before, if he is the Assoc HC. If he is going to be the head man, he needs an experinced Assoc HC to call the plays and develop players. Maybe he will pay attention this time, since he didnt learn anything or at least not nearly enough from Dan.
Billyboy78 wrote: ↑3 years ago
With the loss of income because of COVID and the NCAA credits eventually running out, I don't see an increase in salaries for head coach or assistants any time soon.
........OK, so if that becomes a major factor in the coaching decision making process, among others, then we are stuck in the swirling drain of A-10 mediocrity.......the coaching salaries across the board have to be consistent with what program “bar” is as stated......no?
Rhody72 wrote: ↑3 years ago
It has been a long time since I have started a new thread, but I feel that we need to discuss the future of David Cox as our basketball coach NOW. I truly believe that David Cox will become a great college basketball coach and now is the time to secure him as URI's coach when a more lucrative contract from URI would interest him and stabilize program leadership. Don't wait until David is a hot commodity and other schools outbid us for his services. Also, I believe that now is the time that a mutually beneficial contract can be reached that will keep him as URI's coach when he becomes successful, something that has plagued URI for decades. David possesses the characteristics of great basketball coaches. He is smart, a leader, a role model with terrific interpersonal skills, a proven recruiter and a person that I project will develop players and build a strong program. The players he has recruited are high quality individuals. Now is the time for us to get behind David and push the administration to support URI basketball.
Rhody72 wrote: ↑3 years ago
It has been a long time since I have started a new thread, but I feel that we need to discuss the future of David Cox as our basketball coach NOW. I truly believe that David Cox will become a great college basketball coach and now is the time to secure him as URI's coach when a more lucrative contract from URI would interest him and stabilize program leadership. Don't wait until David is a hot commodity and other schools outbid us for his services. Also, I believe that now is the time that a mutually beneficial contract can be reached that will keep him as URI's coach when he becomes successful, something that has plagued URI for decades. David possesses the characteristics of great basketball coaches. He is smart, a leader, a role model with terrific interpersonal skills, a proven recruiter and a person that I project will develop players and build a strong program. The players he has recruited are high quality individuals. Now is the time for us to get behind David and push the administration to support URI basketball.
Rhody72 wrote: ↑3 years ago
It has been a long time since I have started a new thread, but I feel that we need to discuss the future of David Cox as our basketball coach NOW. I truly believe that David Cox will become a great college basketball coach and now is the time to secure him as URI's coach when a more lucrative contract from URI would interest him and stabilize program leadership. Don't wait until David is a hot commodity and other schools outbid us for his services. Also, I believe that now is the time that a mutually beneficial contract can be reached that will keep him as URI's coach when he becomes successful, something that has plagued URI for decades. David possesses the characteristics of great basketball coaches. He is smart, a leader, a role model with terrific interpersonal skills, a proven recruiter and a person that I project will develop players and build a strong program. The players he has recruited are high quality individuals. Now is the time for us to get behind David and push the administration to support URI basketball.
RIFan wrote: ↑3 years ago
I think COVID and the non-traditional season will be cover, and most will get a pass for this season...except Jimmy at BC, but he was there for 7 seasons.
I'm very disapointed in the way the season played out, but i'm glad we at least had one. It was nice until about 10 games ago when it became obvious the coach was clueless about the actual coaching part. He is a recruiter and that's it. Nothing wrong with that as said before, if he is the Assoc HC. If he is going to be the head man, he needs an experinced Assoc HC to call the plays and develop players. Maybe he will pay attention this time, since he didnt learn anything or at least not nearly enough from Dan.
I get it that a lot of the recruiting has come in the form of transfers these days. Just the way it is going to be going forward. But, URI is a program that will be good when it evaluates the prep ranks well, add the occasional top 150 guy, and then adds a transfer for the final piece(s). The 2021 and into the 2022 cycle do not look great so far. I feel like constantly adding these recruits that are coming from another programs is not sustainable at a place like URI. Maybe I am wrong and this is how it will be across the sport. I hope not.
rambone 78 wrote: ↑3 years ago
Cox is getting very defensive in his answers.
That's always a bad sign.
Inexperienced staff? Half of the staff is yes, the elder Carroll and Sutton have been around a long time.
Sutton even has written a book on the X's and O's of the game.
Of course, it hasn't seemed to help this team one stinking bit.
It's ridiculous when you think about it.
I wouldn't count John Carroll, his illness took a major toll on him, he no longer plays a major role on this staff.
Also as much as Kevin Sutton has been around, he spent most of his time in the HS and prep ranks. Never was a college head coach at any level.
This is Sutton's 13th year as a college assistant. How much more experience does he need to be successful in that role?
I was actually pointing out that I didn't feel Kevin Sutton was the experienced seasoned basketball guru that many gave him credit for.
I would of preferred someone in that role as having some college head coaching, because this was Cox's first gig.
I know he was hired because of his relationship with Cox and he trusted him as his top guy.
This would of all been okay if Cox would of brought in a seasoned assistant with maybe some previous head coaching experience rather than Austin Carroll.
DigB wrote: ↑3 years ago
Question: rather than a buyout, can we improve things by forcing an overhaul in his staff?
That would be an issue for Thorr, not sure he can overstep his bounds and undermining Cox's authority on who should be on his staff. That would get extremely confrontational.
DigB wrote: ↑3 years ago
Question: rather than a buyout, can we improve things by forcing an overhaul in his staff?
That would be an issue for Thorr, not sure he can overstep his bounds and undermining Cox's authority on who should be on his staff. That would get extremely confrontational.
Overstep his bounds? Undermine his coach's authority? I do believe the AD has firing authority. He/she is in charge. Not a coach.
DigB wrote: ↑3 years ago
Question: rather than a buyout, can we improve things by forcing an overhaul in his staff?
That would be an issue for Thorr, not sure he can overstep his bounds and undermining Cox's authority on who should be on his staff. That would get extremely confrontational.
Overstep his bounds? Undermine his coach's authority? I do believe the AD has firing authority. He/she is in charge. Not a coach.
If you don't allow the coach to hire their own staff that they work with day in and day out, that is a major disconnect. If it becomes that confrontational then a coaching change at the top is needed. The head coach is supposed to have a better working knowledge of the basketball game then the AD.
As I said the coaching community is pretty tight.
If an AD has the reputation of dictating who will be hired as assistants than you better shut down the program, because no quality head coach would give us a second thought.
Besides if it gets to the point that the AD doesn't trust the judgement of the head coach, then the AD needs to go in a different direction and just hire someone new to take charge.
Last edited by Jersey773 years ago, edited 2 times in total.
Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 years ago
That would be an issue for Thorr, not sure he can overstep his bounds and undermining Cox's authority on who should be on his staff. That would get extremely confrontational.
Overstep his bounds? Undermine his coach's authority? I do believe the AD has firing authority. He/she is in charge. Not a coach.
If you don't allow the coach to hire their own staff that they work with day in and day out, that is a major disconnect. If it becomes that confrontational then a coaching change at the top is needed. The head coach is supposed to have a better working knowledge of the basketball game then the AD.
As I said the coaching community is pretty tight.
If an AD has the reputation of dictating who will be hired as assistants than you better shut down the program, because no quality head coach would give us a second thought.
Overstep his bounds? Undermine his coach's authority? I do believe the AD has firing authority. He/she is in charge. Not a coach.
If you don't allow the coach to hire their own staff that they work with day in and day out, that is a major disconnect. If it becomes that confrontational then a coaching change at the top is needed. The head coach is supposed to have a better working knowledge of the basketball game then the AD.
As I said the coaching community is pretty tight.
If an AD has the reputation of dictating who will be hired as assistants than you better shut down the program, because no quality head coach would give us a second thought.
Did Baron hire Murph, or did he have some help?
That was a recommendation that Baron was on board with to fill a vacancy, Murphy was very young, an alumni, and an up and comer. That is much different than being told to overhaul your entire staff, including firing one of your closest friend and associate.
DigB wrote: ↑3 years ago
Question: rather than a buyout, can we improve things by forcing an overhaul in his staff?
That would be an issue for Thorr, not sure he can overstep his bounds and undermining Cox's authority on who should be on his staff. That would get extremely confrontational.
Do you think Cox has the temperament to be confrontational on any subject? He is much more likely to say “whatever you want , boss”. Eg. See animation on bench after a bad call
Coach Cox is in his 3rd year of his 5 year contract. He had a mediocre year, 9-9, a good year 13-5, and 7-10 below average year in the A-10. Coach Cox is a proven recruiter, very personable, and a good role model. However, these are not the only attributes needed to be a head coach. It was disappointing to see the team actually play worse as the season went on losing 6 of 7 games.
The last game with GW was a disaster. GW had not played a game in 35 days and could not practice due to Covid 19. They only had 7 scholarship players available. They had 2 players that scored almost 60 points. Despite of all this, we could not manage a win. We should have been able to press and and play a havoc type defense, in addition to changing match ups to stop 2 players from beating us. Coach Cox is playing 9 players and we should have been able to run them off the court. The lack of defensive effort is inexcusable, not just in this game but all season.
The offense has struugled to find any rythem due to all the substitutions. I am also concerned about the lack of development, poor shot selection, lack of assists, turnovers, etc. This all boils down to a lack of fundamentals and discipline.
Next season will be a pivotal season for Coach Cox. It will be his 4th year and unless there is considerable improvement we should move on.
Blue Man wrote: ↑3 years ago
Not hyperbole - is Tammi Reiss a better coach than DC?
Watching them their offense is in constant motion and their defense is significantly more active and communicates better than ours.
Don’t really care for the women’s game as much as men’s, but there’s a noticeable difference in effort and execution even if the speed and skill isn’t the same.
Could it be? Someone with actual previous head coaching experience is ... is... is... a. better. head. coach?
A fun thing to do on twitter is tagging Thor in all news related to a team possibly parting ways with a coach. Recent tags include Albany's Will Brown and Minnesota's Richard Pitino ... Fun times!
BlackDogRants wrote: ↑3 years ago
A fun thing to do on twitter is tagging Thor in all news related to a team possibly parting ways with a coach. Recent tags include Albany's Will Brown and Minnesota's Richard Pitino ... Fun times!
I would like to help out but Thorr blocked me on Twitter
Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 years ago
I wouldn't count John Carroll, his illness took a major toll on him, he no longer plays a major role on this staff.
Also as much as Kevin Sutton has been around, he spent most of his time in the HS and prep ranks. Never was a college head coach at any level.
This is Sutton's 13th year as a college assistant. How much more experience does he need to be successful in that role?
I was actually pointing out that I didn't feel Kevin Sutton was the experienced seasoned basketball guru that many gave him credit for.
I would of preferred someone in that role as having some college head coaching, because this was Cox's first gig.
I know he was hired because of his relationship with Cox and he trusted him as his top guy.
This would of all been okay if Cox would of brought in a seasoned assistant with maybe some previous head coaching experience rather than Austin Carroll.
But that's the whole point and role of John Carroll
Take down the Robert Carothers banner and fix the concession stand lines
Blue Man wrote: ↑3 years ago
Not hyperbole - is Tammi Reiss a better coach than DC?
Watching them their offense is in constant motion and their defense is significantly more active and communicates better than ours.
Don’t really care for the women’s game as much as men’s, but there’s a noticeable difference in effort and execution even if the speed and skill isn’t the same.
Could it be? Someone with actual previous head coaching experience is ... is... is... a. better. head. coach?
This is Tammi Reiss' first head coaching position. The problem isn't hiring people with no previous head coaching experience, the problem is the last two times the men's basketball program has they've been the wrong guy
Take down the Robert Carothers banner and fix the concession stand lines
Dan was a driven and passionate individual who was going to will his team to victory and press the administration for improvements; he expected and demanded results from everyone, including himself. Cox is not Dan, in fact they are opposite and that's why the relationship worked. There is more than one way to win, and Cox better figure out what his way is.
I could see Slick Rich coaching at URI one day. He has plenty of connections in the area through his father, being a student at PC and coaching St Andrew's.
Blue Man wrote: ↑3 years ago
Not hyperbole - is Tammi Reiss a better coach than DC?
Watching them their offense is in constant motion and their defense is significantly more active and communicates better than ours.
Don’t really care for the women’s game as much as men’s, but there’s a noticeable difference in effort and execution even if the speed and skill isn’t the same.
Could it be? Someone with actual previous head coaching experience is ... is... is... a. better. head. coach?
This is Tammi Reiss' first head coaching position. The problem isn't hiring people with no previous head coaching experience, the problem is the last two times the men's basketball program has they've been the wrong guy
Oh...I see youre right. Well - she was in Juwanna Mann and David Cox wasn't so...there.
This is Sutton's 13th year as a college assistant. How much more experience does he need to be successful in that role?
I was actually pointing out that I didn't feel Kevin Sutton was the experienced seasoned basketball guru that many gave him credit for.
I would of preferred someone in that role as having some college head coaching, because this was Cox's first gig.
I know he was hired because of his relationship with Cox and he trusted him as his top guy.
This would of all been okay if Cox would of brought in a seasoned assistant with maybe some previous head coaching experience rather than Austin Carroll.
But that's the whole point and role of John Carroll
That was the original intention, but Carroll went down last season and is in an extremely limited role this year due to very serious health concerns. That is why I was hoping they would of hired a more seasoned coach than Austin.
Yesterday I watched the replay of the overtime win at Dayton from 2 years ago (Cox' first year). He was very active and vocal as he paced the sideline and actually called a couple of time outs as Dayton made a couple of small runs during the game. It seems like that type of time out has not been utilized much at all this year much to the chagrin of all of us on this board.
The question is why has he changed so much from two years ago. I cannot think of an answer.
Any idea why?
eli#10 wrote: ↑3 years ago
Yesterday I watched the replay of the overtime win at Dayton from 2 years ago (Cox' first year). He was very active and vocal as he paced the sideline and actually called a couple of time outs as Dayton made a couple of small runs during the game. It seems like that type of time out has not been utilized much at all this year much to the chagrin of all of us on this board.
The question is why has he changed so much from two years ago. I cannot think of an answer.
Any idea why?
......not that I agree, with any improvement over this season, the admin will probably extend, no raise, as the admin will be satisfied, even w/o post season appearance, the admin will see right track.......and then down the path to Baronville we go......
section(105) wrote: ↑3 years ago
......not that I agree, with any improvement over this season, the admin will probably extend, no raise, as the admin will be satisfied, even w/o post season appearance, the admin will see right track.......and then down the path to Baronville we go......
I really hope not!
This program should now be measured by NCAA appearances. And NOT every 20 years.
If they drag it out like they did with Baron, this program will end up no better than it was at the end of Baron's tenure.
That would also prove to me, that the administration flat out lied about actually wanting to be consistently top of the A10.
Join the fucking NEC or MAAC if that's what they want.
Thorr's going to be in a tough spot, of his own making.
I'm sure when he hired Cox, that he wouldn't end up in this situation again. But here we are.
Rhodymob05 wrote: ↑3 years ago
I could see Slick Rich coaching at URI one day. He has plenty of connections in the area through his father, being a student at PC and coaching St Andrew's.
Oh man...we can only hope. Name him the coach tomorrow, and if they were to say 'fans allowed starting Game 1 next year'....you might not be able to get a ticket..
Rhodymob05 wrote: ↑3 years ago
I could see Slick Rich coaching at URI one day. He has plenty of connections in the area through his father, being a student at PC and coaching St Andrew's.
Oh man...we can only hope. Name him the coach tomorrow, and if they were to say 'fans allowed starting Game 1 next year'....you might not be able to get a ticket..
I think that ship has sailed we may have had a shot at him after DH left but the powers at be didn’t want him
Rhodymob05 wrote: ↑3 years ago
I could see Slick Rich coaching at URI one day. He has plenty of connections in the area through his father, being a student at PC and coaching St Andrew's.
Oh man...we can only hope. Name him the coach tomorrow, and if they were to say 'fans allowed starting Game 1 next year'....you might not be able to get a ticket..
I think that ship has sailed we may have had a shot at him after DH left but the powers at be didn’t want him
I think 05 is referring to his son who might be shit-canned from Minnesota