KeaneyBlue - The URI Basketball Forum

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago I guess we can start this since we are in the new year and Depaul fired Stubblefield.

"DePaul basketball: 3 best head coach candidates after Tony Stubblefield firing"
Josh Shertz (Indiana State), Will Wade (McNeese State), Bryce Drew (Grand Canyon).
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/ ... r-BB1h61Ou

NYGFan_Section208 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago I guess we can start this since we are in the new year and Depaul fired Stubblefield.

"DePaul basketball: 3 best head coach candidates after Tony Stubblefield firing"
Josh Shertz (Indiana State), Will Wade (McNeese State), Bryce Drew (Grand Canyon).
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/ ... r-BB1h61Ou

Is that actually an upgrade for any of them?

ramster wrote: ↑3 months ago

NYGFan_Section208 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago I guess we can start this since we are in the new year and Depaul fired Stubblefield.

"DePaul basketball: 3 best head coach candidates after Tony Stubblefield firing"
Josh Shertz (Indiana State), Will Wade (McNeese State), Bryce Drew (Grand Canyon).
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/ ... r-BB1h61Ou

Is that actually an upgrade for any of them?

We start the 2024 Coaching Carousel thread with NET 304 DePaul. Was Fordham not available?

No, not an upgrade. They can all do better. They should wait it out.

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago I guess we can start this since we are in the new year and Depaul fired Stubblefield.

"DePaul basketball: 3 best head coach candidates after Tony Stubblefield firing"
Josh Shertz (Indiana State), Will Wade (McNeese State), Bryce Drew (Grand Canyon).
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/ ... r-BB1h61Ou

reef wrote: ↑3 months ago

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago I guess we can start this since we are in the new year and Depaul fired Stubblefield.

"DePaul basketball: 3 best head coach candidates after Tony Stubblefield firing"
Josh Shertz (Indiana State), Will Wade (McNeese State), Bryce Drew (Grand Canyon).
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/ ... r-BB1h61Ou

Bryce Drew be a nice hire for them , would it be a huge pay jump ?

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago

reef wrote: ↑3 months ago

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago I guess we can start this since we are in the new year and Depaul fired Stubblefield.

"DePaul basketball: 3 best head coach candidates after Tony Stubblefield firing"
Josh Shertz (Indiana State), Will Wade (McNeese State), Bryce Drew (Grand Canyon).
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/ ... r-BB1h61Ou

Bryce Drew be a nice hire for them , would it be a huge pay jump ?

Maybe not a huge jump, he is compensated very well at GCU.

Opportunity to coach in the BE, also recruiting hotbed in Chicago (even though the Blue Demons have struggled).
Won't have immediate stress and pressure to succeed.
Can put his mark on returning DePaul to their previous glory days under Ray Meyer.

Still, he along with some others may wait for better opportunities to open up.

NYGFan_Section208 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago

reef wrote: ↑3 months ago

Bryce Drew be a nice hire for them , would it be a huge pay jump ?

Maybe not a huge jump, he is compensated very well at GCU.

Opportunity to coach in the BE, also recruiting hotbed in Chicago (even though the Blue Demons have struggled).
Won't have immediate stress and pressure to succeed.
Can put his mark on returning DePaul to their previous glory days under Ray Meyer.

Still, he along with some others may wait for better opportunities to open up.

When you look at all the +'s and -'s...I'm not sure DePaul is as good a job as GCU...is it?

UCH21377 wrote: ↑3 months ago DePaul is a graveyard for coaches. Drew would be nuts to even look at it

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago

NYGFan_Section208 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Maybe not a huge jump, he is compensated very well at GCU.

Opportunity to coach in the BE, also recruiting hotbed in Chicago (even though the Blue Demons have struggled).
Won't have immediate stress and pressure to succeed.
Can put his mark on returning DePaul to their previous glory days under Ray Meyer.

Still, he along with some others may wait for better opportunities to open up.

When you look at all the +'s and -'s...I'm not sure DePaul is as good a job as GCU...is it?

You may be right, unless it becomes an ego thing (playing with the big boys) or they offer him a deal he can't refuse.

NYGFan_Section208 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago

NYGFan_Section208 wrote: ↑3 months ago

When you look at all the +'s and -'s...I'm not sure DePaul is as good a job as GCU...is it?

You may be right, unless it becomes an ego thing (playing with the big boys) or they offer him a deal he can't refuse.

If I'm him, I'm not seeing DePaul as an upgrade job in any way.

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago Possible A10 HC changes?

Keith Dambrot- Turning 66, will he retire or be shown the door? 7 seasons at Duquesne (48-62) and not much to show for it.
Fran Dunphy- Will be 76, time to give it up already and La Salle is still in the cellar.
Travis Ford- Fans have had it with him. 8th year at SLU and only 1 NCAAT (no wins), this season is looking ugly.

Will Anthony Grant get another opportunity to trade up?
Much depends on how Dayton finishes the year and can they get some run in the NCAAT.
Unfortunately, no post-season in 2020, but was named NCOY.

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago Possible A10 HC changes?

Keith Dambrot- Turning 66, will he retire or be shown the door? 7 seasons at Duquesne (48-62) and not much to show for it.
Fran Dunphy- Will be 76, time to give it up already and La Salle is still in the cellar.
Travis Ford- Fans have had it with him. 8th year at SLU and only 1 NCAAT (no wins), this season is looking ugly.

Will Anthony Grant get another opportunity to trade up?
Much depends on how Dayton finishes the year and can they get some run in the NCAAT.
Unfortunately, no post-season in 2020, but was named NCOY.

reef wrote: ↑3 months ago If Ford gets canned , do you guys think he coaches again ?

reef wrote: ↑3 months ago If Ford gets canned , do you guys think he coaches again ?

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago Possible A10 HC changes?

Keith Dambrot- Turning 66, will he retire or be shown the door? 7 seasons at Duquesne (48-62) and not much to show for it.
Fran Dunphy- Will be 76, time to give it up already and La Salle is still in the cellar.
Travis Ford- Fans have had it with him. 8th year at SLU and only 1 NCAAT (no wins), this season is looking ugly.

Will Anthony Grant get another opportunity to trade up?
Much depends on how Dayton finishes the year and can they get some run in the NCAAT.
Unfortunately, no post-season in 2020, but was named NCOY.

SGreenwell wrote: ↑3 months ago I think Ford's coaching future would depend on how important it is for him to be the head coach. Like, Jim Baron found a job after URI - there's another rung after this mid-major level that Ford would be seen as a great hire for. I'm not sure if that would pay more or less than an assistant job at some programs.

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago Arizona State's Bobby Hurley back on college basketball coaches on the hot seat lists
Story by Jeremy Cluff, Arizona Republic • 3h

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/ ... r-BB1hP4sP

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago Arizona State's Bobby Hurley back on college basketball coaches on the hot seat lists
Story by Jeremy Cluff, Arizona Republic • 3h

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/ ... r-BB1hP4sP

Jdrums#3 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago Arizona State's Bobby Hurley back on college basketball coaches on the hot seat lists
Story by Jeremy Cluff, Arizona Republic • 3h

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/ ... r-BB1hP4sP

Jersey, I wonder where he could land if he is fired ?

DePaul comes to mind but I don’t know if he and Dan want to go head to head at least twice a season. What do you think ?

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Jdrums#3 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago Arizona State's Bobby Hurley back on college basketball coaches on the hot seat lists
Story by Jeremy Cluff, Arizona Republic • 3h

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/ ... r-BB1hP4sP

Jersey, I wonder where he could land if he is fired ?

DePaul comes to mind but I don’t know if he and Dan want to go head to head at least twice a season. What do you think ?

I posted it because it was out there in the Arizona Republic, but I think he gets another season.

He did sign a 2-year extension this past March that goes through 25-26.

If the team does tank and he is let go, I think he will have no trouble finding a landing spot.
He can also decide to sit out a season if the right opportunity doesn't immediately come along and collect on his contract.

However, I do agree with you about DePaul.




.

NYGFan_Section208 wrote: ↑3 months ago

ramster wrote: ↑3 months ago

NYGFan_Section208 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Is that actually an upgrade for any of them?

We start the 2024 Coaching Carousel thread with NET 304 DePaul. Was Fordham not available?

No, not an upgrade. They can all do better. They should wait it out.

Fordham? Fordham?? An elite program by comparison at #180 and their new coach just led them to their best season in more than three decades last year... That's a plum job compared to DePaul

NYGFan_Section208 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Jdrums#3 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Jersey, I wonder where he could land if he is fired ?

DePaul comes to mind but I don’t know if he and Dan want to go head to head at least twice a season. What do you think ?

I posted it because it was out there in the Arizona Republic, but I think he gets another season.

He did sign a 2-year extension this past March that goes through 25-26.

If the team does tank and he is let go, I think he will have no trouble finding a landing spot.
He can also decide to sit out a season if the right opportunity doesn't immediately come along and collect on his contract.

However, I do agree with you about DePaul.




.

Louisville

PlayMikeMotenMore wrote: ↑3 months ago

NYGFan_Section208 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago

I posted it because it was out there in the Arizona Republic, but I think he gets another season.

He did sign a 2-year extension this past March that goes through 25-26.

If the team does tank and he is let go, I think he will have no trouble finding a landing spot.
He can also decide to sit out a season if the right opportunity doesn't immediately come along and collect on his contract.

However, I do agree with you about DePaul.




.

Louisville

1. Why would a higher profile basketball school (Louisville) hire a guy fired from a lower profile basketball school (ASU) where he didn't win big enough?
2. Why would a guy like Bobby Hurley take a job at DePaul that's been a coach-killing job for the last 25 years and is currently one of the worst jobs in college basketball? Why would Hurley, with no Midwest roots, want to settle in Chicago?
3. Why would DePaul hire Bobby Hurley, somebody with no Chicago roots in the city and coming off a job at ASU where he did OK but didn't make ASU a top Pac-12 job? Only people in their 40's and 50's know the name Bobby Hurley.

If DePaul were smart (which nobody claims they are), they would have to look at the Indiana State head coach, Josh Schertz. That guy has won before and is winning now. Bryce Drew is a Midwest guy but he's smart enough to know that DePaul might not be a good enough job for him. (Remember, Drew coached at Vandy at one time.) And don't be surprised if DePaul makes a run at Drew Valentine from Loyola. Young guy, known in the city and the public league, and has Loyola back winning after last year's train wreck.

PlayMikeMotenMore wrote: ↑3 months ago

NYGFan_Section208 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago

I posted it because it was out there in the Arizona Republic, but I think he gets another season.

He did sign a 2-year extension this past March that goes through 25-26.

If the team does tank and he is let go, I think he will have no trouble finding a landing spot.
He can also decide to sit out a season if the right opportunity doesn't immediately come along and collect on his contract.

However, I do agree with you about DePaul.




.

Louisville

1. Why would a higher profile basketball school (Louisville) hire a guy fired from a lower profile basketball school (ASU) where he didn't win big enough?
2. Why would a guy like Bobby Hurley take a job at DePaul that's been a coach-killing job for the last 25 years and is currently one of the worst jobs in college basketball? Why would Hurley, with no Midwest roots, want to settle in Chicago?
3. Why would DePaul hire Bobby Hurley, somebody with no Chicago roots in the city and coming off a job at ASU where he did OK but didn't make ASU a top Pac-12 job? Only people in their 40's and 50's know the name Bobby Hurley.

If DePaul were smart (which nobody claims they are), they would have to look at the Indiana State head coach, Josh Schertz. That guy has won before and is winning now. Bryce Drew is a Midwest guy but he's smart enough to know that DePaul might not be a good enough job for him. (Remember, Drew coached at Vandy at one time.) And don't be surprised if DePaul makes a run at Drew Valentine from Loyola. Young guy, known in the city and the public league, and has Loyola back winning after last year's train wreck.

Jersey77 wrote: ↑3 months ago

PlayMikeMotenMore wrote: ↑3 months ago

NYGFan_Section208 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Louisville

1. Why would a higher profile basketball school (Louisville) hire a guy fired from a lower profile basketball school (ASU) where he didn't win big enough?
2. Why would a guy like Bobby Hurley take a job at DePaul that's been a coach-killing job for the last 25 years and is currently one of the worst jobs in college basketball? Why would Hurley, with no Midwest roots, want to settle in Chicago?
3. Why would DePaul hire Bobby Hurley, somebody with no Chicago roots in the city and coming off a job at ASU where he did OK but didn't make ASU a top Pac-12 job? Only people in their 40's and 50's know the name Bobby Hurley.

If DePaul were smart (which nobody claims they are), they would have to look at the Indiana State head coach, Josh Schertz. That guy has won before and is winning now. Bryce Drew is a Midwest guy but he's smart enough to know that DePaul might not be a good enough job for him. (Remember, Drew coached at Vandy at one time.) And don't be surprised if DePaul makes a run at Drew Valentine from Loyola. Young guy, known in the city and the public league, and has Loyola back winning after last year's train wreck.

If DePaul can land Josh Schertz, that would be a win for them.

Jdrums#3 wrote: ↑3 months ago

PlayMikeMotenMore wrote: ↑3 months ago

NYGFan_Section208 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Louisville

1. Why would a higher profile basketball school (Louisville) hire a guy fired from a lower profile basketball school (ASU) where he didn't win big enough?
2. Why would a guy like Bobby Hurley take a job at DePaul that's been a coach-killing job for the last 25 years and is currently one of the worst jobs in college basketball? Why would Hurley, with no Midwest roots, want to settle in Chicago?
3. Why would DePaul hire Bobby Hurley, somebody with no Chicago roots in the city and coming off a job at ASU where he did OK but didn't make ASU a top Pac-12 job? Only people in their 40's and 50's know the name Bobby Hurley.

If DePaul were smart (which nobody claims they are), they would have to look at the Indiana State head coach, Josh Schertz. That guy has won before and is winning now. Bryce Drew is a Midwest guy but he's smart enough to know that DePaul might not be a good enough job for him. (Remember, Drew coached at Vandy at one time.) And don't be surprised if DePaul makes a run at Drew Valentine from Loyola. Young guy, known in the city and the public league, and has Loyola back winning after last year's train wreck.

Good questions regarding DePaul and Bobby, PMM. Personally, I don’t think Bobby would ever consider DePaul just because he and Dan would be going head to head 2-3 times a season - and I don’t believe he and Dan want to have to do that if it is avoidable. I don’t think they have the stomach for it, imho.

For me that would exclude him regarding DePaul whether or not he is ever considered. It’s more a Bobby question than a DePaul question in my mind. He is the subject not DePaul so it is solely from Bobby’s perspective for me.

Beyond that, I have no idea what DePaul would do. But your choices sound solid at first glance. Solid points made.

As for Louisville, considering Bobby is the subject, I do think he would be interested in the job if he let go. Shoot…why wouldn’t he be interested. Would that interest be reciprocated. Who knows ? A lot can happen between now and if the Louisville job is open if Bobby is let go.

That said, you make good points from a Louisville perspective if their job opens and if Bobby is available.

I am going to guess the others above were looking at it from Bobby’s perspective as well unless advised otherwise.

Good discussion and good points adding perspectives from DePaul and Louisville angle.

PlayMikeMotenMore wrote: ↑3 months ago

Jdrums#3 wrote: ↑3 months ago

PlayMikeMotenMore wrote: ↑3 months ago

1. Why would a higher profile basketball school (Louisville) hire a guy fired from a lower profile basketball school (ASU) where he didn't win big enough?
2. Why would a guy like Bobby Hurley take a job at DePaul that's been a coach-killing job for the last 25 years and is currently one of the worst jobs in college basketball? Why would Hurley, with no Midwest roots, want to settle in Chicago?
3. Why would DePaul hire Bobby Hurley, somebody with no Chicago roots in the city and coming off a job at ASU where he did OK but didn't make ASU a top Pac-12 job? Only people in their 40's and 50's know the name Bobby Hurley.

If DePaul were smart (which nobody claims they are), they would have to look at the Indiana State head coach, Josh Schertz. That guy has won before and is winning now. Bryce Drew is a Midwest guy but he's smart enough to know that DePaul might not be a good enough job for him. (Remember, Drew coached at Vandy at one time.) And don't be surprised if DePaul makes a run at Drew Valentine from Loyola. Young guy, known in the city and the public league, and has Loyola back winning after last year's train wreck.

Good questions regarding DePaul and Bobby, PMM. Personally, I don’t think Bobby would ever consider DePaul just because he and Dan would be going head to head 2-3 times a season - and I don’t believe he and Dan want to have to do that if it is avoidable. I don’t think they have the stomach for it, imho.

For me that would exclude him regarding DePaul whether or not he is ever considered. It’s more a Bobby question than a DePaul question in my mind. He is the subject not DePaul so it is solely from Bobby’s perspective for me.

Beyond that, I have no idea what DePaul would do. But your choices sound solid at first glance. Solid points made.

As for Louisville, considering Bobby is the subject, I do think he would be interested in the job if he let go. Shoot…why wouldn’t he be interested. Would that interest be reciprocated. Who knows ? A lot can happen between now and if the Louisville job is open if Bobby is let go.

That said, you make good points from a Louisville perspective if their job opens and if Bobby is available.

I am going to guess the others above were looking at it from Bobby’s perspective as well unless advised otherwise.

Good discussion and good points adding perspectives from DePaul and Louisville angle.

Thanks...greatly appreciated.

adam914 wrote: ↑2 months ago Does Bobby still love his horse racing to? Perfect fit there in Louisville. I'm mostly joking, but do agree that Bobby to Louisville would seem to make a lot of sense for them if he's interested.

SGreenwell wrote: ↑2 months ago

adam914 wrote: ↑2 months ago Does Bobby still love his horse racing to? Perfect fit there in Louisville. I'm mostly joking, but do agree that Bobby to Louisville would seem to make a lot of sense for them if he's interested.

I kind of think you have it backwards - Louisville is going to be interested in a guy that Arizona State shitcans? I think Bobby is going to have to "settle" for a mid-major job or an undesirable power conference job (DePaul or something similar).

SGreenwell wrote: ↑2 months ago

adam914 wrote: ↑2 months ago Does Bobby still love his horse racing to? Perfect fit there in Louisville. I'm mostly joking, but do agree that Bobby to Louisville would seem to make a lot of sense for them if he's interested.

I kind of think you have it backwards - Louisville is going to be interested in a guy that Arizona State shitcans? I think Bobby is going to have to "settle" for a mid-major job or an undesirable power conference job (DePaul or something similar).

Blue Man wrote: ↑2 months ago

PlayMikeMotenMore wrote: ↑3 months ago

Jdrums#3 wrote: ↑3 months ago

Good questions regarding DePaul and Bobby, PMM. Personally, I don’t think Bobby would ever consider DePaul just because he and Dan would be going head to head 2-3 times a season - and I don’t believe he and Dan want to have to do that if it is avoidable. I don’t think they have the stomach for it, imho.

For me that would exclude him regarding DePaul whether or not he is ever considered. It’s more a Bobby question than a DePaul question in my mind. He is the subject not DePaul so it is solely from Bobby’s perspective for me.

Beyond that, I have no idea what DePaul would do. But your choices sound solid at first glance. Solid points made.

As for Louisville, considering Bobby is the subject, I do think he would be interested in the job if he let go. Shoot…why wouldn’t he be interested. Would that interest be reciprocated. Who knows ? A lot can happen between now and if the Louisville job is open if Bobby is let go.

That said, you make good points from a Louisville perspective if their job opens and if Bobby is available.

I am going to guess the others above were looking at it from Bobby’s perspective as well unless advised otherwise.

Good discussion and good points adding perspectives from DePaul and Louisville angle.

Thanks...greatly appreciated.

I definitely agree about the DePaul angle. Coach killer and it'd have to be the right kind of midwest person coming from a lower level program to even sniff it. From the Bobby angle, no shot would he and Dan coach against each other. Bobby's made plenty of money at ASU, he could easily afford to go the Archie route for a year if the right gig doesn't appear.

That said, Louisville could use ANYTHING to get a jolt into their arm. At a minimum, someone without the stink of scandal.

For what it's worth, Bobby Hurley has taken ASU to more NCAA tournaments than any other coach in their last 45 years. He's "winning" as much as anyone else has in Tempe. Yeah he's had some poor tournament showings, but ASU isn't some blue blood with any realistic expectations of deep march runs.

Louisville is a joke. They've had significantly more head coaches than they have tournament births in the last 7 years (4-1). They've actually had more coaching scandals than tournament births as well. They haven't had a winning season in 4 years.

This was a program that within the last decade was coming off of 9 straight NCAAs, more wins than I can count, 6 sweet 16s, 5 elite 8s, 3 final fours, and a national title. They are so dead that they need a big name to revive it - and Hurley might be the perfect fit.

He's not too big where he will have a ton of options, but he's got a hell of a pedigree, name, and standing in college basketball - especially on the east coast.

No one really cares or watches Pac12 or west coast basketball in the eastern time zone, so any perceived "failures" at ASU won't really be looked at. He's a collegiate basketball legend, and would be a huge buzz coming back east.

I don't think you can any longer call Louisville a high profile program. The ACC has become an increasingly irrelevant basketball conference. Not to say they're not "good" but they're not the unquestionable best conference in college basketball anymore. There's no more Coach K, Roy Williams, Boeheim, or Pitino roaming the sidelines. Virginia is really all that's left consistently. Obviously Miami had their run last year.

But to act like Louisville is only going to hire some proven coaching legend is a fallacy. They hired Kenny friggin Payne last year. They grabbed Chris Mack from Xavier.

Bobby Hurley would be an absolute hit for Louisville. It'd at least give them some buzz.

steviep123 wrote: ↑2 months ago

Blue Man wrote: ↑2 months ago

PlayMikeMotenMore wrote: ↑3 months ago

Thanks...greatly appreciated.

I definitely agree about the DePaul angle. Coach killer and it'd have to be the right kind of midwest person coming from a lower level program to even sniff it. From the Bobby angle, no shot would he and Dan coach against each other. Bobby's made plenty of money at ASU, he could easily afford to go the Archie route for a year if the right gig doesn't appear.

That said, Louisville could use ANYTHING to get a jolt into their arm. At a minimum, someone without the stink of scandal.

For what it's worth, Bobby Hurley has taken ASU to more NCAA tournaments than any other coach in their last 45 years. He's "winning" as much as anyone else has in Tempe. Yeah he's had some poor tournament showings, but ASU isn't some blue blood with any realistic expectations of deep march runs.

Louisville is a joke. They've had significantly more head coaches than they have tournament births in the last 7 years (4-1). They've actually had more coaching scandals than tournament births as well. They haven't had a winning season in 4 years.

This was a program that within the last decade was coming off of 9 straight NCAAs, more wins than I can count, 6 sweet 16s, 5 elite 8s, 3 final fours, and a national title. They are so dead that they need a big name to revive it - and Hurley might be the perfect fit.

He's not too big where he will have a ton of options, but he's got a hell of a pedigree, name, and standing in college basketball - especially on the east coast.

No one really cares or watches Pac12 or west coast basketball in the eastern time zone, so any perceived "failures" at ASU won't really be looked at. He's a collegiate basketball legend, and would be a huge buzz coming back east.

I don't think you can any longer call Louisville a high profile program. The ACC has become an increasingly irrelevant basketball conference. Not to say they're not "good" but they're not the unquestionable best conference in college basketball anymore. There's no more Coach K, Roy Williams, Boeheim, or Pitino roaming the sidelines. Virginia is really all that's left consistently. Obviously Miami had their run last year.

But to act like Louisville is only going to hire some proven coaching legend is a fallacy. They hired Kenny friggin Payne last year. They grabbed Chris Mack from Xavier.

Bobby Hurley would be an absolute hit for Louisville. It'd at least give them some buzz.

I agree with most of this - except UNC hasn't really missed a beat since Roy retired. They lost in the Championship (as an 8 seed) in Davis' first seaon coach, didn't make the tourney last year, and is currently # 3 in the AP poll. (Well I guess you could say they missed 1 beat, and to play devil's advocate, you could say they weren't consistent in Davis' first 2 years). I haven't dug that deep, but UNC has only missed 5 tourneys since 1975: 2003, 2004, 2010 (Ulmer was fouled and it could have been considered intentional!), 2020, and last year

from wikipedia:

NCAA tournament appearances
1941, 1946, 1957, 1959, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1972, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021, 2022

Blue Man wrote: ↑2 months ago

steviep123 wrote: ↑2 months ago

Blue Man wrote: ↑2 months ago

I definitely agree about the DePaul angle. Coach killer and it'd have to be the right kind of midwest person coming from a lower level program to even sniff it. From the Bobby angle, no shot would he and Dan coach against each other. Bobby's made plenty of money at ASU, he could easily afford to go the Archie route for a year if the right gig doesn't appear.

That said, Louisville could use ANYTHING to get a jolt into their arm. At a minimum, someone without the stink of scandal.

For what it's worth, Bobby Hurley has taken ASU to more NCAA tournaments than any other coach in their last 45 years. He's "winning" as much as anyone else has in Tempe. Yeah he's had some poor tournament showings, but ASU isn't some blue blood with any realistic expectations of deep march runs.

Louisville is a joke. They've had significantly more head coaches than they have tournament births in the last 7 years (4-1). They've actually had more coaching scandals than tournament births as well. They haven't had a winning season in 4 years.

This was a program that within the last decade was coming off of 9 straight NCAAs, more wins than I can count, 6 sweet 16s, 5 elite 8s, 3 final fours, and a national title. They are so dead that they need a big name to revive it - and Hurley might be the perfect fit.

He's not too big where he will have a ton of options, but he's got a hell of a pedigree, name, and standing in college basketball - especially on the east coast.

No one really cares or watches Pac12 or west coast basketball in the eastern time zone, so any perceived "failures" at ASU won't really be looked at. He's a collegiate basketball legend, and would be a huge buzz coming back east.

I don't think you can any longer call Louisville a high profile program. The ACC has become an increasingly irrelevant basketball conference. Not to say they're not "good" but they're not the unquestionable best conference in college basketball anymore. There's no more Coach K, Roy Williams, Boeheim, or Pitino roaming the sidelines. Virginia is really all that's left consistently. Obviously Miami had their run last year.

But to act like Louisville is only going to hire some proven coaching legend is a fallacy. They hired Kenny friggin Payne last year. They grabbed Chris Mack from Xavier.

Bobby Hurley would be an absolute hit for Louisville. It'd at least give them some buzz.

I agree with most of this - except UNC hasn't really missed a beat since Roy retired. They lost in the Championship (as an 8 seed) in Davis' first seaon coach, didn't make the tourney last year, and is currently # 3 in the AP poll. (Well I guess you could say they missed 1 beat, and to play devil's advocate, you could say they weren't consistent in Davis' first 2 years). I haven't dug that deep, but UNC has only missed 5 tourneys since 1975: 2003, 2004, 2010 (Ulmer was fouled and it could have been considered intentional!), 2020, and last year

from wikipedia:

NCAA tournament appearances
1941, 1946, 1957, 1959, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1972, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021, 2022

Certainly fair, but I’ve always held the belief that those first 2 years are more indicative of the past guy than the present guy.

So UNC going from preseason top 5 to no birth was an instant wake up call that the luster of Tar Heel legend had worn off a bit.

I’m certainly not arguing how great they have been historically as a program, but Hubert Davis ain’t Roy Williams or Dean Smith.

Blue Man wrote: ↑2 months ago

steviep123 wrote: ↑2 months ago

Blue Man wrote: ↑2 months ago

I definitely agree about the DePaul angle. Coach killer and it'd have to be the right kind of midwest person coming from a lower level program to even sniff it. From the Bobby angle, no shot would he and Dan coach against each other. Bobby's made plenty of money at ASU, he could easily afford to go the Archie route for a year if the right gig doesn't appear.

That said, Louisville could use ANYTHING to get a jolt into their arm. At a minimum, someone without the stink of scandal.

For what it's worth, Bobby Hurley has taken ASU to more NCAA tournaments than any other coach in their last 45 years. He's "winning" as much as anyone else has in Tempe. Yeah he's had some poor tournament showings, but ASU isn't some blue blood with any realistic expectations of deep march runs.

Louisville is a joke. They've had significantly more head coaches than they have tournament births in the last 7 years (4-1). They've actually had more coaching scandals than tournament births as well. They haven't had a winning season in 4 years.

This was a program that within the last decade was coming off of 9 straight NCAAs, more wins than I can count, 6 sweet 16s, 5 elite 8s, 3 final fours, and a national title. They are so dead that they need a big name to revive it - and Hurley might be the perfect fit.

He's not too big where he will have a ton of options, but he's got a hell of a pedigree, name, and standing in college basketball - especially on the east coast.

No one really cares or watches Pac12 or west coast basketball in the eastern time zone, so any perceived "failures" at ASU won't really be looked at. He's a collegiate basketball legend, and would be a huge buzz coming back east.

I don't think you can any longer call Louisville a high profile program. The ACC has become an increasingly irrelevant basketball conference. Not to say they're not "good" but they're not the unquestionable best conference in college basketball anymore. There's no more Coach K, Roy Williams, Boeheim, or Pitino roaming the sidelines. Virginia is really all that's left consistently. Obviously Miami had their run last year.

But to act like Louisville is only going to hire some proven coaching legend is a fallacy. They hired Kenny friggin Payne last year. They grabbed Chris Mack from Xavier.

Bobby Hurley would be an absolute hit for Louisville. It'd at least give them some buzz.

I agree with most of this - except UNC hasn't really missed a beat since Roy retired. They lost in the Championship (as an 8 seed) in Davis' first seaon coach, didn't make the tourney last year, and is currently # 3 in the AP poll. (Well I guess you could say they missed 1 beat, and to play devil's advocate, you could say they weren't consistent in Davis' first 2 years). I haven't dug that deep, but UNC has only missed 5 tourneys since 1975: 2003, 2004, 2010 (Ulmer was fouled and it could have been considered intentional!), 2020, and last year

from wikipedia:

NCAA tournament appearances
1941, 1946, 1957, 1959, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1972, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021, 2022

Certainly fair, but I’ve always held the belief that those first 2 years are more indicative of the past guy than the present guy.

So UNC going from preseason top 5 to no birth was an instant wake up call that the luster of Tar Heel legend had worn off a bit.

I’m certainly not arguing how great they have been historically as a program, but Hubert Davis ain’t Roy Williams or Dean Smith.

bigappleram wrote: ↑2 months ago If this year taught anything it's that there are virtually no true "programs" in college hoops. It's all coach driven.
Look at Nova. Look at Louisville. Look at UConn in last couple Ollie years. The luster from a highly successful predecessor wears off quick and the minute you stop winning the brand takes a massive hit. We are still digging out from our own version of that.

PeterRamTime wrote: ↑2 months ago

Blue Man wrote: ↑2 months ago

steviep123 wrote: ↑2 months ago

I agree with most of this - except UNC hasn't really missed a beat since Roy retired. They lost in the Championship (as an 8 seed) in Davis' first seaon coach, didn't make the tourney last year, and is currently # 3 in the AP poll. (Well I guess you could say they missed 1 beat, and to play devil's advocate, you could say they weren't consistent in Davis' first 2 years). I haven't dug that deep, but UNC has only missed 5 tourneys since 1975: 2003, 2004, 2010 (Ulmer was fouled and it could have been considered intentional!), 2020, and last year

from wikipedia:

NCAA tournament appearances
1941, 1946, 1957, 1959, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1972, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021, 2022

Certainly fair, but I’ve always held the belief that those first 2 years are more indicative of the past guy than the present guy.

So UNC going from preseason top 5 to no birth was an instant wake up call that the luster of Tar Heel legend had worn off a bit.

I’m certainly not arguing how great they have been historically as a program, but Hubert Davis ain’t Roy Williams or Dean Smith.

Always wondered how Roy Williams would have done if he wasn't handed the two of the easiest coaching jobs in the history of college basketball. Roy had an NIT team in there as well and could never win a title at Kansas. I would say Hubert has a chance to be as good as Roy. Just out athlete and talent everyone. That's UNC basketball lol.

SGreenwell wrote: ↑2 months ago

adam914 wrote: ↑2 months ago Does Bobby still love his horse racing to? Perfect fit there in Louisville. I'm mostly joking, but do agree that Bobby to Louisville would seem to make a lot of sense for them if he's interested.

I kind of think you have it backwards - Louisville is going to be interested in a guy that Arizona State shitcans? I think Bobby is going to have to "settle" for a mid-major job or an undesirable power conference job (DePaul or something similar).