'19 DC C - Makhi Mitchell (Rhode Island Commit)

Talk about future recruits and scouting efforts in this forum.
Forum rules
If you start a recruit thread and don't set up a profile, make a blank post first so a profile can be added later.

Place whatever you were going to post in the second post.
URIRecruitingInfo
ARD
Posts: 707
Joined: 7 years ago
x 367

'19 DC C - Makhi Mitchell (Rhode Island Commit)

Unread post by URIRecruitingInfo »

Makhi Mitchell - C
From: Washington, DC
School: Woodrow Wilson
AAU: DC Premier

Ht: 6'9"
Wt: 225

RANKINGS:
Rivals: 4 Stars, #57 in 2019, #13 C
247 Sports: 4 Stars, 93 Grade, #91 in 2019, #18 C
ESPN: 4 Stars, 86 Grade, #70 in 2019, #17 C



INTEREST:
Rhode Island*
Georgetown
PC

*Announced Transfer to URI on 3/30/2020

https://n.rivals.com/content/prospects/ ... chell-1050
https://247sports.com/Player/Makhi-Mitc ... ol-216670/
http://www.espn.com/college-sports/bask ... i-mitchell
http://www.verbalcommits.com/players/ma ... l-maryland

Maryland Stats: https://www.espn.com/mens-college-baske ... i-mitchell
Last edited by URIRecruitingInfo 3 years ago, edited 4 times in total.
0 x
SandorClegane
Art Stephenson
Posts: 875
Joined: 6 years ago
x 758

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by SandorClegane »

Need size. Sign them up.
Why did I think they were 7 footers?
1 x
“The greatest things in life are invisible to the eye”
- Mr. Rogers
URI96
ARD
Posts: 573
Joined: 11 years ago
x 116

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by URI96 »

Looks like PC is out of the running based on the latest tweet from their mom.
1 x
Like soldiers on a Winter's night with a vow to DEFEND, no retreat baby, no surrender.
Billyboy78
Frank Keaney
Posts: 16614
Joined: 11 years ago
x 8842

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Billyboy78 »

But they wouldn't be available until the '21-'22 season, correct?
0 x
URI96
ARD
Posts: 573
Joined: 11 years ago
x 116

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by URI96 »

I think the suspicion is they’ll get a waiver. Even if they don’t I’m guessing it is a second semester deal since they left UMD in December
0 x
Like soldiers on a Winter's night with a vow to DEFEND, no retreat baby, no surrender.
Billyboy78
Frank Keaney
Posts: 16614
Joined: 11 years ago
x 8842

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Billyboy78 »

URI96 wrote: 4 years ago I think the suspicion is they’ll get a waiver. Even if they don’t I’m guessing it is a second semester deal since they left UMD in December
So, they're not in school right now. I wasn't sure if they just left the team or left the school completely.
0 x
URI96
ARD
Posts: 573
Joined: 11 years ago
x 116

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by URI96 »

They entered the portal in December. That’s all I know for sure.
0 x
Like soldiers on a Winter's night with a vow to DEFEND, no retreat baby, no surrender.
Section104
Art Stephenson
Posts: 904
Joined: 11 years ago
Location: Nashville, TN
x 1046

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Section104 »

All transfers will likely be immediately eligible next year
2 x
User avatar
ElmCityRhody
Sly Williams
Posts: 4457
Joined: 11 years ago
x 2399

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by ElmCityRhody »

begging

i need good news to lift my spirits
1 x
ramster
Frank Keaney
Posts: 23984
Joined: 11 years ago
x 8985

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by ramster »

Section104 wrote: 4 years ago All transfers will likely be immediately eligible next year
Those coming and going
2 x
Rhody15
Ernie Calverley
Posts: 7714
Joined: 11 years ago
Location: Rhode Island
x 6512

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Rhody15 »

Doesn’t Turgeon hate us going back to the Hurley days? Would think he’d do all he can to make sure they don’t get waivers.
0 x
Go Rhody
ramster
Frank Keaney
Posts: 23984
Joined: 11 years ago
x 8985

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by ramster »

No. He even scheduled a game with URI this season
0 x
PeterRamTime
Ernie Calverley
Posts: 9914
Joined: 9 years ago
x 5734

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by PeterRamTime »

Well Jeff Erman I would be surprised if they did in fact come here.

Doesnt he know we are collapsing and nothing good will ever happen to us again????
0 x
User avatar
Rhodymob05
Tyson Wheeler
Posts: 7439
Joined: 11 years ago
Location: Rhode Island
x 4003

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Rhodymob05 »

These guys would be program changers.
0 x
GO RAMS
Rhody15
Ernie Calverley
Posts: 7714
Joined: 11 years ago
Location: Rhode Island
x 6512

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Rhody15 »

Rhodymob05 wrote: 4 years ago These guys would be program changers.
We said that about a certain current big man on our roster, let’s hold back calling recruits “program changers.”
2 x
Go Rhody
User avatar
Rhodymob05
Tyson Wheeler
Posts: 7439
Joined: 11 years ago
Location: Rhode Island
x 4003

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Rhodymob05 »

Rhody15 wrote: 4 years ago
Rhodymob05 wrote: 4 years ago These guys would be program changers.
We said that about a certain current big man on our roster, let’s hold back calling recruits “program changers.”
True lol, but being from the BIG 10 helps.
0 x
GO RAMS
Rhody22
Lamar Odom
Posts: 326
Joined: 11 years ago
x 398

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Rhody22 »

Rhody15 wrote: 4 years ago
Rhodymob05 wrote: 4 years ago These guys would be program changers.
We said that about a certain current big man on our roster, let’s hold back calling recruits “program changers.”
Most players who consider coming here we tend to overhype and dream of them becoming the next Mobley, Silk, Wheeler, Odom. Then they play and we want to wait another year for them to develop. We do it every year...
4 x
Rhody15
Ernie Calverley
Posts: 7714
Joined: 11 years ago
Location: Rhode Island
x 6512

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Rhody15 »

Rhody22 wrote: 4 years ago
Rhody15 wrote: 4 years ago
Rhodymob05 wrote: 4 years ago These guys would be program changers.
We said that about a certain current big man on our roster, let’s hold back calling recruits “program changers.”
Most players who consider coming here we tend to overhype and dream of them becoming the next Mobley, Silk, Wheeler, Odom. Then they play and we want to wait another year for them to develop. We do it every year...
Exactly, that’s why I’m done getting hyped up over unproven 17/18 year olds.

Because for all we know, Leggett or a Wood could be the next Ja Morant Or busts.

With that being said, I’ll take these two twin towers any day of the week. You can’t teach height, and they sure have that.

It’s a total crapshoot.
1 x
Go Rhody
Rhody22
Lamar Odom
Posts: 326
Joined: 11 years ago
x 398

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Rhody22 »

Rhody15 wrote: 4 years ago
Rhody22 wrote: 4 years ago
Rhody15 wrote: 4 years ago

We said that about a certain current big man on our roster, let’s hold back calling recruits “program changers.”
Most players who consider coming here we tend to overhype and dream of them becoming the next Mobley, Silk, Wheeler, Odom. Then they play and we want to wait another year for them to develop. We do it every year...
Exactly, that’s why I’m done getting hyped up over unproven 17/18 year olds.

Because for all we know, Leggett or a Wood could be the next Ja Morant Or busts.

With that being said, I’ll take these two twin towers any day of the week. You can’t teach height, and they sure have that.

It’s a total crapshoot.

I’m with you!
0 x
rhodylaw
Cuttino Mobley
Posts: 2047
Joined: 11 years ago
x 1387

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by rhodylaw »

I think the way they did this they are stuck sitting all of next year - I still want them here though because I think they will thrive in the A10.
0 x
FDshoes
ARD
Posts: 540
Joined: 6 years ago
x 439

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by FDshoes »

rhodylaw wrote: 4 years ago I think the way they did this they are stuck sitting all of next year - I still want them here though because I think they will thrive in the A10.
This is also my thought. They wasted the spring semester by not enrolling somewhere. Or atleast that is how i understood the transfer rules pending exemption obviously. Or rule change.
0 x
Tjrams91
Jeff Kent
Posts: 190
Joined: 5 years ago
x 140

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Tjrams91 »

FDshoes wrote: 4 years ago
rhodylaw wrote: 4 years ago I think the way they did this they are stuck sitting all of next year - I still want them here though because I think they will thrive in the A10.
This is also my thought. They wasted the spring semester by not enrolling somewhere. Or atleast that is how i understood the transfer rules pending exemption obviously. Or rule change.
They dropped off the team before the end of December. So they wouldn’t come in next January and miss OOC play?
0 x
Section104
Art Stephenson
Posts: 904
Joined: 11 years ago
Location: Nashville, TN
x 1046

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Section104 »

It’s been widely reported that it’s almost certain that there will no longer be a requirement for first time transfers to sit out a year. All transfers should be immediately eligible. Could that change? Sure. But it’s the same reason we’re worried we’re going to see players leave this offseason.
1 x
rhodyfan3000
Tom Garrick
Posts: 1310
Joined: 4 years ago
x 997

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by rhodyfan3000 »

All these years, they all told us: "big men don't grow on trees" "they aren't just wandering around waiting to be snapped up by Rhody" "if recruiting a big with size and athleticism were easy, everyone would have them"

Now, we are on the cusp of getting these two guys. All the rules just went right out the window.
0 x
Tjrams91
Jeff Kent
Posts: 190
Joined: 5 years ago
x 140

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Tjrams91 »

Can we merge the Twins thread? They are a package deal. It’s a fact.
4 x
User avatar
ace
Ernie Calverley
Posts: 8072
Joined: 11 years ago
x 5607

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by ace »

Is this still accurate or... ?
Only one of them is good but they are going anywhere as a package deal. They also have excessive baggage. It’s best we steer clear.
I don’t necessarily disagree with the “baggage”- they were supposedly going to be suspended before they left Maryland and some very public comments were made by their mother. URI needs the bodies, and I’m all for second chances. Maybe a few people on here will think twice before they make comments about guys quitting on their team or about involved parents. Also, instant eligibility can be good... can’t just like it when it works for you and hate it when it goes against you. There’s always a role for transfers, but I hope this program doesn’t turn into Nevada or something. It’s fun to watch guys develop from the start. Their abbreviated freshmen numbers are kind of ugly, but they’re still probably better than the ‘20s available at this time of year.
3 x
SandorClegane
Art Stephenson
Posts: 875
Joined: 6 years ago
x 758

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by SandorClegane »

Tjrams91 wrote: 4 years ago Can we merge the Twins thread? They are a package deal. It’s a fact.
Ha. I was going to post this as well. Package deal = one thread. 😂
1 x
“The greatest things in life are invisible to the eye”
- Mr. Rogers
JimSidd
Art Stephenson
Posts: 880
Joined: 5 years ago
x 655

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by JimSidd »

Section104 wrote: 4 years ago It’s been widely reported that it’s almost certain that there will no longer be a requirement for first time transfers to sit out a year. All transfers should be immediately eligible. Could that change? Sure. But it’s the same reason we’re worried we’re going to see players leave this offseason.
I’ve been reading about this as well. I didn’t realize all D1 athletes today except those that play football or men’s or women’s basketball are immediately eligible now when they transfer. It is being referred to as a one time transfer: no multiple transfer to try and chase a championship. While it seems likely this will be approved, since it hasn’t happened yet, it most likely won’t be in place for next season.
0 x
Rhody15
Ernie Calverley
Posts: 7714
Joined: 11 years ago
Location: Rhode Island
x 6512

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Rhody15 »

If they do come here, worst case scenario is they’re eligible second semester, so at least they wouldn’t have to wait the whole year to play.
1 x
Go Rhody
Rhody83
Tyson Wheeler
Posts: 7437
Joined: 9 years ago
x 3942

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Rhody83 »

JimSidd wrote: 4 years ago
Section104 wrote: 4 years ago It’s been widely reported that it’s almost certain that there will no longer be a requirement for first time transfers to sit out a year. All transfers should be immediately eligible. Could that change? Sure. But it’s the same reason we’re worried we’re going to see players leave this offseason.
I’ve been reading about this as well. I didn’t realize all D1 athletes today except those that play football or men’s or women’s basketball are immediately eligible now when they transfer. It is being referred to as a one time transfer: no multiple transfer to try and chase a championship. While it seems likely this will be approved, since it hasn’t happened yet, it most likely won’t be in place for next season.
Not true. Could still be approved for 2020. NCAA Council to vote in April.
From SI article:
If the NCAA Division I Council approves the proposal in April, first-time transfers starting in the 2020 academic year would no longer have to endure the long-standing “year-in-residence” in their first season at their new school. The proposal is being fast-tracked
0 x
“We will be good when we are good.”
rhodylaw
Cuttino Mobley
Posts: 2047
Joined: 11 years ago
x 1387

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by rhodylaw »

I read that to mean if you transferred starting next year you wouldn’t have to wait a year. I hate the 1 year sit out, but the alternative will be chaos.
0 x
PeterRamTime
Ernie Calverley
Posts: 9914
Joined: 9 years ago
x 5734

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by PeterRamTime »

When are these guys visiting exactly?
0 x
Rhody83
Tyson Wheeler
Posts: 7437
Joined: 9 years ago
x 3942

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Rhody83 »

0 x
“We will be good when we are good.”
Rhody83
Tyson Wheeler
Posts: 7437
Joined: 9 years ago
x 3942

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Rhody83 »

0 x
“We will be good when we are good.”
Rhody83
Tyson Wheeler
Posts: 7437
Joined: 9 years ago
x 3942

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Rhody83 »

0 x
“We will be good when we are good.”
reef
Frank Keaney
Posts: 14944
Joined: 11 years ago
x 5261

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by reef »

We need to land these twins just what the doctor ordered
1 x
Iggy1979
Sly Williams
Posts: 4538
Joined: 11 years ago
x 2063

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Iggy1979 »

Looks great in the video but neither did much with Md.
0 x
"Every season, college basketball has one or two teams that rise from dormancy to relevancy, squads that make long-awaited charges at the NCAA Tournament and become really fun storylines along the way."
User avatar
PCFriars
Jeff Kent
Posts: 194
Joined: 7 years ago
x 344

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by PCFriars »

reef wrote: 4 years ago We need to land these twins just what the doctor ordered
I think the decision is yours. These guys are looking for a program to accept them. If the staff wants them, I'm sure they will wind up in Kingston.
1 x
PeterRamTime
Ernie Calverley
Posts: 9914
Joined: 9 years ago
x 5734

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by PeterRamTime »

PCFriars wrote: 4 years ago
reef wrote: 4 years ago We need to land these twins just what the doctor ordered
I think the decision is yours. These guys are looking for a program to accept them. If the staff wants them, I'm sure they will wind up in Kingston.
So I guess they have really acquired quite the reputation.

I've heard they moved around a lot in high school.

Does their mom always get too involved or something?
0 x
reef
Frank Keaney
Posts: 14944
Joined: 11 years ago
x 5261

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by reef »

Let’s take a chance on these kids we need some bigs !!!
1 x
RamStock
Cuttino Mobley
Posts: 1996
Joined: 5 years ago
x 1425

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by RamStock »

PeterRamTime wrote: 4 years ago
PCFriars wrote: 4 years ago
reef wrote: 4 years ago We need to land these twins just what the doctor ordered
I think the decision is yours. These guys are looking for a program to accept them. If the staff wants them, I'm sure they will wind up in Kingston.
So I guess they have really acquired quite the reputation.

I've heard they moved around a lot in high school.

Does their mom always get too involved or something?
I would much rather get Odusipe than these two. It feels like as soon as something doesn’t go their way they will go to their mom and pack their bags. I get that they have talent and we really need good players with what we have left so I’m sure it is worth the risk if we strikeout on the pair from Tennessee.
0 x
DeanDome88
Tom Garrick
Posts: 1452
Joined: 10 years ago
x 983

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by DeanDome88 »

It could be a large risk because they are twins and a package deal. If they left the program together we would clearly not have enough bigs. If the transfer rule is not changed before the season we are also left short handed. Everyone involved needs to make sure they are on the same wavelength before signing these young men. It also could turn out to be great.
0 x
User avatar
Rhodymob05
Tyson Wheeler
Posts: 7439
Joined: 11 years ago
Location: Rhode Island
x 4003

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Rhodymob05 »

I think having already transferred that the team they choose in the one for them. I hope it’s Kingston.
0 x
GO RAMS
Tjrams91
Jeff Kent
Posts: 190
Joined: 5 years ago
x 140

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Tjrams91 »

I doubt they transfer again if they end up here.
0 x
PeterRamTime
Ernie Calverley
Posts: 9914
Joined: 9 years ago
x 5734

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by PeterRamTime »

Rhodymob05 wrote: 4 years ago I think having already transferred that the team they choose in the one for them. I hope it’s Kingston.
You'd have to think the odds of them transferring again would be pretty low.

However the real issue might be the reason why Turgeon was going to bench them.
0 x
User avatar
ram1980
Art Stephenson
Posts: 945
Joined: 11 years ago
x 1031

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by ram1980 »

<t>We haven't done a great job coaching bigs or incorporating them effectively in the offense.. how does that play out if they come here.. coaching philosophy would have to be tweaked I would think</t>
0 x
reef
Frank Keaney
Posts: 14944
Joined: 11 years ago
x 5261

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by reef »

If the twins want to commit here I say take them at the expense of losing Akeem ???
0 x
SandorClegane
Art Stephenson
Posts: 875
Joined: 6 years ago
x 758

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by SandorClegane »

Ha. Sign all 3 if we can... we have enough 1,2 and 3s with Legget and Wood coming in.
1 x
“The greatest things in life are invisible to the eye”
- Mr. Rogers
Rhody83
Tyson Wheeler
Posts: 7437
Joined: 9 years ago
x 3942

Re: '19 Transfer C - Makhi Mitchell

Unread post by Rhody83 »

URI heads to Brooklyn tomorrow so no unofficial visit on campus this week.
0 x
“We will be good when we are good.”
Post Reply