2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Talk about the men's team, upcoming opponents and news from around college hoop.
neil
Art Stephenson
Posts: 895
Joined: 11 years ago
x 601

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by neil »

Going back to HC for a second, we played them in the ECAC new england tournament back in 79? Did not win very convincingly in that game, which lead to the loss to uconn and Corny Thompson for the right to go to the dance.
0 x
rhodylaw
Cuttino Mobley
Posts: 2047
Joined: 11 years ago
x 1387

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by rhodylaw »

I actually would not mind a home and home against HC as long as the return game is at DCU. I have always thought it was a little hypocritical to expect power 5 teams to play us home and home and not do the same with programs in lesser conferences. Also, I think in this crazy restructured leagues that all New England teams would do themselves a favor by making the northeast the hotbed of college ball once again by recreating rivalries that have been allowed to die off at the expense of chasing conference money.
0 x
theblueram
Frank Keaney
Posts: 10499
Joined: 11 years ago
x 7614

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by theblueram »

The level of incompetence in this state political theater has just hit the level of Ringling Bros. Bunch of clowns.
0 x
User avatar
RhowdyRam02
Frank Keaney
Posts: 10355
Joined: 11 years ago
x 6622

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by RhowdyRam02 »

ESPN has us playing at Brown on 12/30 at 7 pm but I'm not seeing that confirmed on the Brown site.
0 x
Take down the Robert Carothers banner and fix the concession stand lines
neil
Art Stephenson
Posts: 895
Joined: 11 years ago
x 601

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by neil »

Under penalty of "death" from a very reliable source, I can tell you only that the rams have scheduled another home game for the upcoming season. In my opinion, it is a very good one. Sorry for being so clandestine, but when it comes out, the board should be very pleased.
0 x
bressler3south
Carlton Owens
Posts: 3108
Joined: 11 years ago
x 8

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by bressler3south »

neil wrote:Under penalty of "death" from a very reliable source, I can tell you only that the rams have scheduled another home game for the upcoming season. In my opinion, it is a very good one. Sorry for being so clandestine, but when it comes out, the board should be very pleased.
C'mon, Neil….As Henry MIller wrote in The Tropic of Cancer, "We are all alone here and we are dead."
Obviously, you have nothing to worry about……
8-)
0 x
Rhody15
Ernie Calverley
Posts: 7714
Joined: 11 years ago
Location: Rhode Island
x 6512

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by Rhody15 »

neil wrote:Under penalty of "death" from a very reliable source, I can tell you only that the rams have scheduled another home game for the upcoming season. In my opinion, it is a very good one. Sorry for being so clandestine, but when it comes out, the board should be very pleased.
Is it a P5 school or a very good mid major team?

Home and home series? 2 for 1?

Give us any more info?!
0 x
Go Rhody
Billyboy78
Frank Keaney
Posts: 16617
Joined: 11 years ago
x 8846

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by Billyboy78 »

You guys want Neil to die?
0 x
bressler3south
Carlton Owens
Posts: 3108
Joined: 11 years ago
x 8

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by bressler3south »

Billyboy78 wrote:You guys want Neil to die?
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. The dude just retired!!!!!!
0 x
User avatar
RhowdyRam02
Frank Keaney
Posts: 10355
Joined: 11 years ago
x 6622

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by RhowdyRam02 »

neil wrote:Under penalty of "death" from a very reliable source, I can tell you only that the rams have scheduled another home game for the upcoming season. In my opinion, it is a very good one. Sorry for being so clandestine, but when it comes out, the board should be very pleased.
Can you give us an rpi range from this past year and if they should bring back most of their talent from last year?
0 x
Take down the Robert Carothers banner and fix the concession stand lines
ramfan85
Carlton Owens
Posts: 2983
Joined: 11 years ago
x 447

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by ramfan85 »

Mascot? Team colors? Time zone? Anything would be welcomed.
0 x
theblueram
Frank Keaney
Posts: 10499
Joined: 11 years ago
x 7614

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by theblueram »

C'mon Neil, how about at least the conference??????
0 x
Billyboy78
Frank Keaney
Posts: 16617
Joined: 11 years ago
x 8846

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by Billyboy78 »

I'm guessing Xavier.
0 x
neil
Art Stephenson
Posts: 895
Joined: 11 years ago
x 601

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by neil »

With the rope around my neck, danced last year
0 x
theblueram
Frank Keaney
Posts: 10499
Joined: 11 years ago
x 7614

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by theblueram »

I love a good mid-summer mystery!!!! I'm gonna have to peruse the tourney teams from last year.
0 x
User avatar
Shinze88
Art Stephenson
Posts: 843
Joined: 11 years ago
x 551

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by Shinze88 »

neil wrote:With the rope around my neck, danced last year
Its obviously a home and home with the Chanticleers of Coastal Carolina.
0 x
User avatar
Joe
Lamar Odom
Posts: 319
Joined: 9 years ago
Location: Rhode Island
x 61

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by Joe »

neil wrote:With the rope around my neck, danced last year
When do we find out who this "mystery team" is?
0 x
User avatar
860_rhody
Lamar Odom
Posts: 295
Joined: 9 years ago
Location: Straight Outta Kingston
x 35

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by 860_rhody »

My guess is UAB.
0 x
ramster
Frank Keaney
Posts: 23994
Joined: 11 years ago
x 8986

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by ramster »

neil wrote:Under penalty of "death" from a very reliable source, I can tell you only that the rams have scheduled another home game for the upcoming season. In my opinion, it is a very good one. Sorry for being so clandestine, but when it comes out, the board should be very pleased.
Neil,
Is it a home and home arrangement?
0 x
User avatar
STC
Cuttino Mobley
Posts: 1825
Joined: 11 years ago
Location: Quahog
x 1120

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by STC »

860_rhody wrote:My guess is UAB.

It's definitely UAB, under penalty of death is the tipoff. UAB football was just killed this year.
0 x
ramster
Frank Keaney
Posts: 23994
Joined: 11 years ago
x 8986

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by ramster »

Shinze88 wrote:
neil wrote:With the rope around my neck, danced last year
Its obviously a home and home with the Chanticleers of Coastal Carolina.
You could be right.

Could the mystery team possibly be the Oklahoma State Cowboys?
0 x
theblueram
Frank Keaney
Posts: 10499
Joined: 11 years ago
x 7614

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by theblueram »

Maybe Shaka already misses the A10 and is bring Texas in???
0 x
User avatar
RF1
Ernie Calverley
Posts: 9133
Joined: 11 years ago
x 5541

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by RF1 »

Here are the 2015 NCAA teams as listed by seed. I would think the top seeds (say 1-4) are out of the question since they would likely never come to Kingston. The highest seeds are the conference auto bid qualifiers and most wouldn't exactly excite the URI fan base. That would mean it is some team in the mid range. I would further guess it is a better probability it is not a Power-5 team. This pool would include teams such as Northern Iowa, Butler, SMU, Xavier, Wichita St, Cincinnati, San Diego St, St. John's, Boise St, BYU, Buffalo, Wyoming, Harvard, UAB, Belmont, New Mexico St, or Manhattan.

1 Duke
1 Kentucky
1 Villanova
1 Wisconsin
2 Arizona
2 Gonzaga
2 Kansas
2 Virginia
3 Baylor
3 Iowa State
3 Notre Dame
3 Oklahoma
4 Georgetown
4 Louisville
4 Maryland
4 North Carolina
5 Arkansas
5 Northern Iowa
5 Utah
5 West Virginia
6 Butler
6 Providence
6 Southern Methodist
6 Xavier
7 Iowa
7 Michigan State
7 Virginia Commonwealth
7 Wichita State
8 Cincinnati
8 North Carolina State
8 Oregon
8 San Diego State
9 Louisiana State
9 Oklahoma State
9 Purdue
9 St. John's
10 Davidson
10 Georgia
10 Indiana
10 Ohio State
11 Texas
11 UCLA
11* Boise State
11* BYU
11* Dayton
11* Ole Miss
12 Buffalo
12 Stephen F. Austin
12 Wofford
12 Wyoming
13 Eastern Washington
13 Harvard
13 UC Irvine
13 Valparaiso
14 Albany
14 Georgia State
14 Northeastern
14 UAB
15 Belmont
15 New Mexico State
15 North Dakota State
15 Texas Southern
16 Coastal Carolina
16 Lafayette
16* Hampton
16* Manhattan
16* North Florida
16* Robert Morris
Last edited by RF1 8 years ago, edited 1 time in total.
0 x
ramster
Frank Keaney
Posts: 23994
Joined: 11 years ago
x 8986

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by ramster »

theblueram wrote:Maybe Shaka already misses the A10 and is bring Texas in???
Texas was my next guess and also thought about the Wyoming Cowboys - going with the rope theme

Also reviewing RF1's list the Southern Methodist Mustangs could fit the bill. In fact if I was a betting man I would bet its SMU coming to Kingston.
Last edited by ramster 8 years ago, edited 1 time in total.
0 x
User avatar
RF1
Ernie Calverley
Posts: 9133
Joined: 11 years ago
x 5541

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by RF1 »

RF1 wrote:Holy Cross fans per their messageboard believe that this game is part of an even home and home series. The last two games (2005 & 2009) played between the teams (after the Ryan center was opened) were one time buy games in Kingston.

Some Holy Cross fans on their messageboard are now disputing the initial notion that this game is to be part of an even home and home series. This might make more sense as URI has only played the Crusaders twice since 1982 and both were buy games at the Ryan Center.
0 x
reckless jake
ARD
Posts: 675
Joined: 10 years ago
x 280

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by reckless jake »

Harvard
0 x
Rhody15
Ernie Calverley
Posts: 7714
Joined: 11 years ago
Location: Rhode Island
x 6512

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by Rhody15 »

reckless jake wrote:Harvard
This is my guess as well.
0 x
Go Rhody
User avatar
Joe
Lamar Odom
Posts: 319
Joined: 9 years ago
Location: Rhode Island
x 61

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by Joe »

My guess is SF Austin. They are having some scheduling difficulties, or were as of a month or so ago. Actually I'm pretty confident that its the lumberjacks
0 x
URI96
ARD
Posts: 573
Joined: 11 years ago
x 116

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by URI96 »

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I doubt Haaahvaaaahd or SFA would rise to the level of needing to be sworn to secrecy. The same goes for SMU who just played here two years ago. You would swear someone to secrecy if the announcement of said game/team would be used, let's say, as part of a press release to announce season ticket sales or something like that.
0 x
Like soldiers on a Winter's night with a vow to DEFEND, no retreat baby, no surrender.
User avatar
Joe
Lamar Odom
Posts: 319
Joined: 9 years ago
Location: Rhode Island
x 61

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by Joe »

Possibly, I personally want a better team then SF Austin, but hopefully our hopes aren't too high here
Last edited by Joe 8 years ago, edited 1 time in total.
0 x
User avatar
TruePoint
Frank Keaney
Posts: 13856
Joined: 11 years ago
x 11439

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by TruePoint »

URI96 wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I doubt Haaahvaaaahd or SFA would rise to the level of needing to be sworn to secrecy. The same goes for SMU who just played here two years ago. You would swear someone to secrecy if the announcement of said game/team would be used, let's say, as part of a press release to announce season ticket sales or something like that.
Or terms aren't finalized so they don't want to put the cart before the horse.
0 x
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
ramster
Frank Keaney
Posts: 23994
Joined: 11 years ago
x 8986

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by ramster »

Here are the clues or possible leads from Neil:
Under penalty of "death"
In my opinion, it is a very good one.
when it comes out, the board should be very pleased.

Do Harvard and SF Austin fulfill these hints?
I think it might be Oklahoma State, Texas or SMU.
0 x
User avatar
Rhody74
Sly Williams
Posts: 4901
Joined: 11 years ago
x 2484

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by Rhody74 »

I'm thinking Xavier because of the Luke Murray connection ..... but that's only a guess. I'd love to see Michigan State, but that's a pipedream.
0 x
Slava Ukraini!
User avatar
Joe
Lamar Odom
Posts: 319
Joined: 9 years ago
Location: Rhode Island
x 61

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by Joe »

Xavier also makes a lot of sense, with them being ex. A10 and Murray's connection. I wouldn't mind an SF Austin game but at the same time I'd prefer a higher team like xavier
0 x
User avatar
Blue Man
Tyson Wheeler
Posts: 7429
Joined: 11 years ago
x 15149

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by Blue Man »

Knowing nothing about this - if I were to venture a guess it would be Georgetown, Harvard, Utah, Texas or Xavier.

Can't see some of those other teams mentioned as the "sworn to secrecy" level - specifically because they aren't traditional powerhouses that would require big time deals/agreements to get them. If it's this big of a deal not to leak, it's a big enough team.

Neil knows the game and this board and to say that it's a "very good one" and that the board would be "very pleased." I think those 5 make the most sense.

G'town - has a David Cox connection thanks to his time there as an assistant.

Harvard - has numerous ties to the staff, is local, and wouldn't be a complicated deal to work out.

Utah - there were rumors floating around last year of a 15 year reunion type game? Who knows...just something fun to talk about.

Texas - shaka/A10 connection

Xavier - murray/A10 connection
0 x
If you say you’re a Rhody fan, I know you are my brother. For you have suffered as I have suffered.

Give to the Athletic Director's Fund

Give to Rhody's NIL
User avatar
bigappleram
Ernie Calverley
Posts: 8873
Joined: 11 years ago
x 9929

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by bigappleram »

Neil said "in my opinion" its a very good one, so that preface indicates to me that it is not a blue blood type program, eliminating a Georgetown type which in anyone's opinion would be a coup to get in the RC for a game. To me its someone with a marginally high profile, that perhaps Joe Public wouldnt do jumping jacks about but a real college hoops fan would appreciate...someone like Cincinnati possibly? Even Xavier to me is a no-brainer great opponent to bring in and wouldn't warrant the "in my opinion" caveat.

In terms of the secrecy somehow being linked to the quality of the team - I dont buy that. As TP said maybe the deal isnt done yet and the source doesnt want it getting out bc the source will be outed in the process. Many people here get tips and are told to keep it off the board, not because its the biggest scoop since who shot Kennedy, but just bc its not public knowledge. You wont keep many sources if you post everything you hear on this board. I respect Neil's position and will patiently wait for the announcement.
0 x
Ramulous
Carlton Owens
Posts: 3474
Joined: 11 years ago
x 1739

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by Ramulous »

No big east team would ever travel to play a mid-major team at the Ryan Center.....that is beneath them......providence only comes because they have to or they would be shamed.....they would love to have this game every year at the DDC......so xavier and georgetown are eliminated....
0 x
F*ck Alacki, DarthFriar, DirtyBeanFriar94, xCoachK, Boxworth, Friar Faithful, bicycleicycle, Matt_Keough, Patrick Norton, the Rosato brothers, and especially Benjamin Lord !
User avatar
rodfromcranston
Frank Keaney
Posts: 13068
Joined: 11 years ago
x 1517

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by rodfromcranston »

Well, isn't Syracuse sort of getting the death penalty,
because of Boeheim?
0 x
< Arthur is my spirit animal.
ramster
Frank Keaney
Posts: 23994
Joined: 11 years ago
x 8986

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by ramster »

The Team can't be Syracuse since Neil said the team was in the NCAA Tournament last year, so it can't be them.

"With the rope around my neck, danced last year"
0 x
bressler3south
Carlton Owens
Posts: 3108
Joined: 11 years ago
x 8

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by bressler3south »

The Johnnies, Mullin looking for ego-filling moments against fellow Metro-New Yorkers…...
0 x
ramfan85
Carlton Owens
Posts: 2983
Joined: 11 years ago
x 447

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by ramfan85 »

When I think of secrecy, naturally Faber College comes to mind.

Maybe Duke wants to come here.
0 x
theblueram
Frank Keaney
Posts: 10499
Joined: 11 years ago
x 7614

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by theblueram »

ramfan85 wrote:When I think of secrecy, naturally Faber College comes to mind.

Maybe Duke wants to come here.
Talk about a camp out/sleep out for student tickets. Nice thought though.
0 x
User avatar
Joe
Lamar Odom
Posts: 319
Joined: 9 years ago
Location: Rhode Island
x 61

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by Joe »

ramfan85 wrote:When I think of secrecy, naturally Faber College comes to mind.

Maybe Duke wants to come here.
Watching Hassan swat Duke's offense would be pretty awesome
0 x
kal-65
Jeff Kent
Posts: 189
Joined: 11 years ago
x 23

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by kal-65 »

I'M GUESSING EITHER WISCONSIN OR CINCINNATI. WE PLAYED BOTH OF THEM AT THE DUNK IN OUR TOURNAMENT [ LATE 90S] YEARS
0 x
BornNBred33
Steve Chubin
Posts: 112
Joined: 9 years ago

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by BornNBred33 »

If it ends up being Xavier, I will let out a large YAWN......We have seen them for years and years. Give me someone we havent seen.
0 x
User avatar
rodfromcranston
Frank Keaney
Posts: 13068
Joined: 11 years ago
x 1517

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by rodfromcranston »

We played Cincy in a home and home when Harrcik was coach.
Don't recall Wisconsin.
The tournaments at the Dunk ended in the early 80's.
0 x
< Arthur is my spirit animal.
User avatar
RF1
Ernie Calverley
Posts: 9133
Joined: 11 years ago
x 5541

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by RF1 »

kal-65 wrote:I'M GUESSING EITHER WISCONSIN OR CINCINNATI. WE PLAYED BOTH OF THEM AT THE DUNK IN OUR TOURNAMENT [ LATE 90S] YEARS

Cincinnati has already announced its 13 game non conference schedule. This is the maximum number of games allowed as the AAC has an 18 game conference schedule.


http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/cin ... hedule.pdf
0 x
User avatar
bigappleram
Ernie Calverley
Posts: 8873
Joined: 11 years ago
x 9929

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by bigappleram »

Wisconsin would be another no brainer GREAT OPPONENT, so it cant be them either.
0 x
User avatar
rodfromcranston
Frank Keaney
Posts: 13068
Joined: 11 years ago
x 1517

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by rodfromcranston »

Kal-65 is right. We did play Wisconsin at the PCC in
Lamar's year.
We lost. It was in the midst of several losses when Preston
was hurt, and we had no point guard at all.
0 x
< Arthur is my spirit animal.
User avatar
RF1
Ernie Calverley
Posts: 9133
Joined: 11 years ago
x 5541

Re: 2015-16 Schedule Discussion

Unread post by RF1 »

rodfromcranston wrote:Kal-65 is right. We did play Wisconsin at the PCC in
Lamar's year.
We lost. It was in the midst of several losses when Preston
was hurt, and we had no point guard at all.
We actually scheduled pretty well for the OOC during the 90's at the PCC. We hosted Arizona, Texas, Cincinnati, Cal, Wisconsin. Wake Forest, Minnesota, UNLV, and Tulsa. I think it being 25+ miles off campus made it somewhat more palatable to OOC opponents.
0 x
Post Reply