Re: '19 PA C - Naheem McLeod (Florida State Commit)
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 9:22 am
Why do you say that? Now we are just being ridiculous. I like Cox, but what has he done to show that he made adjustments that Hurley wouldn’t? Hurley may not be a great X and O guy, but he puts a fire under a program which he did at Wagner, URI and now Uconn. Cox is a smart guy that players really like and I agree with other people that not getting these recruits has more to do with where we stand as a program than Cox. The bottom line is he will need recruits to win and the 2019 class doesn’t appear to have anyone that can make a major impact. We are leaning on Dowtin, Fatts and Cyril with some help from Thompson. When they graduate is when it will be interesting. I still believe in the freshman and expect some of them will come along as the year progresses. We won’t have a class like 2018 every year so hopefully we can find a transfer with experience.Mongo wrote: ↑5 years agoI bet $1mm that Hurley would have lost the Harvard game if he was coaching it. In Cox We Trust!!!Seawrightspostgame wrote: ↑5 years ago This will be fun. Giving Hurley credit for landing 100% of recruits he doesn't recruit. Hurley would have got that guy. Hurley would have won that game. so on and so on.
24/7 composite scores:MegaRamFan2 wrote: ↑5 years ago I'm by no means a "sky is falling type," but the lack of being able to close on our top 3 targets is a little concerning to me. Even one bad recruiting period can really change the direction that this program is headed. Clearly Cox needs to prove himself before the rest of the country takes us seriously being in a conference like the A-10. Sorry, judge me, but I'm very disappointed...
Hey Chico, I hear ya on that. This does sting, Mcleod could have committed to Rhody, then later decommitted and went to a P5 or FSU in spring (i know this is all hypothetical) but just saying the sting could be worseCHICO 78 wrote: ↑5 years ago We went 0-3 against the Big east and 2 ACC teams. Not for a lack of effort on the Coaches. We look back at Hurley's successes.
EC was a top 100 4* , Jared was a top 100 -4*, Hass was 160 and a 3 * but was injured the year before , missed AAU and was under the radar.
EC bought into the Hurley dream and guaranteed playing time, Jared left and came back, Hurley had been recruiting Hass for years.
Harris is an outlier, not the rule of thumb. We were in early with him, " before I got good" I think his quote was and it
meant something to him. He is the exception. Most kids are going the other way especially if its the ACC or the Big ten.
I think Naheem told both schools he was coming until the last minute because he wanted the pressure to go away.
Then he's left to make one phone call to Rhody and say I changed my mind I'm going to FSU, good bye. Done
no conflict, no long painful conversations. Over. and out. I think at one point he was coming here but the attraction of
the ACC was too strong and eventually it won him over. There may be a JT scenario if FSU gets Wiseman or
he might be too embarrassed to leave. Who knows. Anyway time to move on. Maybe a solid Transfer but we definitely
don't need another project.
I got a few min, so here's the class by class breakdown from 247:MegaRamFan2 wrote: ↑5 years ago I like the positivity, Process... It's not every day that a 7 footer comes to Rhody so I'm a bit depressed. I would just hate for all of us to get back in that "settling mindset" where our class is "good enough" to win the A-10. We were heading towards bigger and better days than that. Again, it's on this group and Cox to win and keep the name relevant to sustain the upward trajectory.
Did you note that there are many more recruits that will be signed and we will drop way down when the 2019 class is complete. Those stats favor quantity over quality. Give me Fatts over these three any day of the week-I get it is easy to say that now. I think it is fair for people to be disappointed. There is nothing that screams we have someone that will come in and be an impact player. On the other side the 2016 class which doesn’t look anywhere near being the 80th best class ended up being a great class for us because we got two top end players in Dowtin and Cyril. Just as people hate hearing others complain on the board on how much we failed with this class it goes the other way also as many get tired of being told how great this class and being one of the best in school history. I guess we need this play out and see if we can get a transfer at some point.Da_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑5 years agoI got a few min, so here's the class by class breakdown from 247:MegaRamFan2 wrote: ↑5 years ago I like the positivity, Process... It's not every day that a 7 footer comes to Rhody so I'm a bit depressed. I would just hate for all of us to get back in that "settling mindset" where our class is "good enough" to win the A-10. We were heading towards bigger and better days than that. Again, it's on this group and Cox to win and keep the name relevant to sustain the upward trajectory.
2013: 63rd nationally, 2nd in A10
#97 EC, #160 Hassan
2014: 63rd nationally, 4th in A10
#64 Terrell, #257 Garrett, Watson - unranked
2015: 115th nationally, 5th in A10
#232 Butts, #433 Thompson
2016: 80th nationally, 5th in A10
#267 Layssard, #273 Dowtin, #287 Tertsea, #326 Langevine
2017: 139th nationally, 9th in A10
#198 Russell
2018: 49th nationally, 1st in A10
#82 Harris, #215 Tate, #220 Martin, Silverio - unranked
2019: 55th nationally, 1st in A10
#193 Hammond, #230 Long, #330 Mading
Hammond, Long and Mading are the 7th, 12th and 16th highest rated recruits we have ever gotten.
If we have gotten to a level where this type of class is a disappointment/settling, then we are in far better shape than we think
for as long as 247 has been tracking recruits, they are.79RhodyFan wrote: ↑5 years ago I think you must of meant Hammond, Long and Mading are the 7th, 12th and 16th highest rated recruits we have gotten since 2013. Can't believe they would rank that high all time.
Because until he had 6 seniors, his teams lost many more close games than they won. Not saying anything that isn’t backed by history, fact, his first 5 seasons had many last possession losses. I think Hurley did amazing things for our program, but winning close games were not his thing until last season.RamStock wrote: ↑5 years agoWhy do you say that? Now we are just being ridiculous. I like Cox, but what has he done to show that he made adjustments that Hurley wouldn’t? Hurley may not be a great X and O guy, but he puts a fire under a program which he did at Wagner, URI and now Uconn. Cox is a smart guy that players really like and I agree with other people that not getting these recruits has more to do with where we stand as a program than Cox. The bottom line is he will need recruits to win and the 2019 class doesn’t appear to have anyone that can make a major impact. We are leaning on Dowtin, Fatts and Cyril with some help from Thompson. When they graduate is when it will be interesting. I still believe in the freshman and expect some of them will come along as the year progresses. We won’t have a class like 2018 every year so hopefully we can find a transfer with experience.Mongo wrote: ↑5 years agoI bet $1mm that Hurley would have lost the Harvard game if he was coaching it. In Cox We Trust!!!Seawrightspostgame wrote: ↑5 years ago This will be fun. Giving Hurley credit for landing 100% of recruits he doesn't recruit. Hurley would have got that guy. Hurley would have won that game. so on and so on.
Amen.Mongo wrote: ↑5 years agoBecause until he had 6 seniors, his teams lost many more close games than they won. Not saying anything that isn’t backed by history, fact, his first 5 seasons had many last possession losses. I think Hurley did amazing things for our program, but winning close games were not his thing until last season.RamStock wrote: ↑5 years agoWhy do you say that? Now we are just being ridiculous. I like Cox, but what has he done to show that he made adjustments that Hurley wouldn’t? Hurley may not be a great X and O guy, but he puts a fire under a program which he did at Wagner, URI and now Uconn. Cox is a smart guy that players really like and I agree with other people that not getting these recruits has more to do with where we stand as a program than Cox. The bottom line is he will need recruits to win and the 2019 class doesn’t appear to have anyone that can make a major impact. We are leaning on Dowtin, Fatts and Cyril with some help from Thompson. When they graduate is when it will be interesting. I still believe in the freshman and expect some of them will come along as the year progresses. We won’t have a class like 2018 every year so hopefully we can find a transfer with experience.
He'll end up just like Koumadje, who in his senior year this year is finally on court for 40% of the game. What a waste. He's choosing to ride the bench behind Koprivica for 4 years. They probably told him Koprivica will play some 4, but there aren't many 6'11 4 men in college these days so I highly doubt it.
Nobody is giving up. But I don't think we have the luxury of just brushing off losing top 100 recruits and 7 footers who would make a huge impact in the A-10. These guys have nothing to do with this season so I don't understand how any of the posts could be viewed as "giving up." Our best freshmen class in a long time are here now and on the verge of being impact players, but sustained success is what I think we would all love to be a part of as fans.PeterRamTime wrote: ↑5 years ago It's really not the end of the world.
Gregory Hammond is rated as THE BEST player in Louisiana.
I mean, c'mon.
Do make any definitive decisions on whether our freshman are going to pan out now is really ignorant.
3 games in and people are giving up.
Relax.
Its almost as if winning games with a bad team is harder then winning games with a good team!Mongo wrote: ↑5 years ago Because until he had 6 seniors, his teams lost many more close games than they won. Not saying anything that isn’t backed by history, fact, his first 5 seasons had many last possession losses. I think Hurley did amazing things for our program, but winning close games were not his thing until last season.
I live in Texas and go to Louisiana every 6 weeks for work. I’ve talked to people that really follow HS BB there and have been told he is a VERY good player. He truly is thought of a The best in the state, and is the type of player we want. He’s a very hard worker, talented and really good teammate. I’m good with that.PeterRamTime wrote: ↑5 years ago It's really not the end of the world.
Gregory Hammond is rated as THE BEST player in Louisiana.
I mean, c'mon.
Do make any definitive decisions on whether our freshman are going to pan out now is really ignorant.
3 games in and people are giving up.
Relax.
Proves how awful the ratings areDa_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑5 years agofor as long as 247 has been tracking recruits, they are.79RhodyFan wrote: ↑5 years ago I think you must of meant Hammond, Long and Mading are the 7th, 12th and 16th highest rated recruits we have gotten since 2013. Can't believe they would rank that high all time.
https://247sports.com/college/rhode-isl ... eRecruits/
Or how bad our recruiting was prior to Hurley.Iggy1979 wrote: ↑5 years agoProves how awful the ratings areDa_Process_Survivor wrote: ↑5 years agofor as long as 247 has been tracking recruits, they are.79RhodyFan wrote: ↑5 years ago I think you must of meant Hammond, Long and Mading are the 7th, 12th and 16th highest rated recruits we have gotten since 2013. Can't believe they would rank that high all time.
https://247sports.com/college/rhode-isl ... eRecruits/
I thought the consensus on Layssard was that he dominated an inferior level of competition, looked great doing it but nobody could really be sure what he’d look like against better competition. Hammond has at least played in a better level of high school ball (from what I understand) and also played in very competitive AAU circuits, so it isn’t like nobody had seen him against other good players - as was the case with Layssard.
And Cox’s first win comes on a low probability shot made by a player who ignored the play call, but he gets the credit- and, quite sincerely, good for him. There’s just not much real narrative to be had when you’re talking about such small sample sizes, but amen or whatever. Win or lose, Cox coached a great game against Harvard. He controlled what he could, which is all a coach can do. I’m glad they got it because I think it’s going to look better and better as the season goes on.adam914 wrote: ↑5 years agoIts almost as if winning games with a bad team is harder then winning games with a good team!Mongo wrote: ↑5 years ago Because until he had 6 seniors, his teams lost many more close games than they won. Not saying anything that isn’t backed by history, fact, his first 5 seasons had many last possession losses. I think Hurley did amazing things for our program, but winning close games were not his thing until last season.
Here comes Ace again with her cape on subtlety defending DH while backhand complimenting Cox.ace wrote: ↑5 years agoAnd Cox’s first win comes on a low probability shot made by a player who ignored the play call, but he gets the credit- and, quite sincerely, good for him. There’s just not much real narrative to be had when you’re talking about such small sample sizes, but amen or whatever. Win or lose, Cox coached a great game against Harvard. He controlled what he could, which is all a coach can do. I’m glad they got it because I think it’s going to look better and better as the season goes on.adam914 wrote: ↑5 years agoIts almost as if winning games with a bad team is harder then winning games with a good team!Mongo wrote: ↑5 years ago Because until he had 6 seniors, his teams lost many more close games than they won. Not saying anything that isn’t backed by history, fact, his first 5 seasons had many last possession losses. I think Hurley did amazing things for our program, but winning close games were not his thing until last season.
And here comes DC again with their cape on defending Cox' virtue from all real and imagined slights! Especially the imagined onesDC_Rams wrote: ↑5 years agoHere comes Ace again with her cape on subtlety defending DH while backhand complimenting Cox.ace wrote: ↑5 years agoAnd Cox’s first win comes on a low probability shot made by a player who ignored the play call, but he gets the credit- and, quite sincerely, good for him. There’s just not much real narrative to be had when you’re talking about such small sample sizes, but amen or whatever. Win or lose, Cox coached a great game against Harvard. He controlled what he could, which is all a coach can do. I’m glad they got it because I think it’s going to look better and better as the season goes on.
But amen or whatever....
I defend who is here, working for the University.RhowdyRam02 wrote: ↑5 years agoAnd here comes DC again with their cape on defending Cox' virtue from all real and imagined slights! Especially the imagined onesDC_Rams wrote: ↑5 years agoHere comes Ace again with her cape on subtlety defending DH while backhand complimenting Cox.ace wrote: ↑5 years ago
And Cox’s first win comes on a low probability shot made by a player who ignored the play call, but he gets the credit- and, quite sincerely, good for him. There’s just not much real narrative to be had when you’re talking about such small sample sizes, but amen or whatever. Win or lose, Cox coached a great game against Harvard. He controlled what he could, which is all a coach can do. I’m glad they got it because I think it’s going to look better and better as the season goes on.
But amen or whatever....
Not to bust your balls (just an expression) but his first win was a blowout against Bryant.ace wrote: ↑5 years agoAnd Cox’s first win comes on a low probability shot made by a player who ignored the play call, but he gets the credit- and, quite sincerely, good for him. There’s just not much real narrative to be had when you’re talking about such small sample sizes, but amen or whatever. Win or lose, Cox coached a great game against Harvard. He controlled what he could, which is all a coach can do. I’m glad they got it because I think it’s going to look better and better as the season goes on.adam914 wrote: ↑5 years agoIts almost as if winning games with a bad team is harder then winning games with a good team!Mongo wrote: ↑5 years ago Because until he had 6 seniors, his teams lost many more close games than they won. Not saying anything that isn’t backed by history, fact, his first 5 seasons had many last possession losses. I think Hurley did amazing things for our program, but winning close games were not his thing until last season.
Right. Game winning shots tend to not tell much about a coach at all. First, because there’s a story behind every box score and, second, there aren’t enough of them to say anything meaningful. That’s just math.RhowdyRam02 wrote: ↑5 years agoAnd here comes DC again with their cape on defending Cox' virtue from all real and imagined slights! Especially the imagined onesDC_Rams wrote: ↑5 years agoHere comes Ace again with her cape on subtlety defending DH while backhand complimenting Cox.ace wrote: ↑5 years ago
And Cox’s first win comes on a low probability shot made by a player who ignored the play call, but he gets the credit- and, quite sincerely, good for him. There’s just not much real narrative to be had when you’re talking about such small sample sizes, but amen or whatever. Win or lose, Cox coached a great game against Harvard. He controlled what he could, which is all a coach can do. I’m glad they got it because I think it’s going to look better and better as the season goes on.
But amen or whatever....