Page 18 of 19

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2018 5:04 pm
by Rhodymob05
BC ? You’ve got to be kidding me

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2018 5:22 pm
by KevanBoyles
For what it’s worth, Walker’s post today is consistent with DC_URI’s post two days ago. It certainly makes sense if we moved on when we took Marial Mading that we wouldn’t be in his final four or five.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:49 pm
by Rhody83
KevanBoyles wrote: 5 years ago For what it’s worth, Walker’s post today is consistent with DC_URI’s post two days ago. It certainly makes sense if we moved on when we took Marial Mading that we wouldn’t be in his final four or five.
Agree it seems DC URI was correct.
Walker’s stance when Rhody pushed for a commitment that he was going to take all five visits along with Walker’s tweet that he would make a decision the last week of Oct after the VCU visit didn’t hold up. It could be he received pressure from Miami to make a decision because they have other recruits to pursue. I am not sure why he needed to announce a final four. Also, I would guess that he has already made his decision.

It seems URI wanted to fill specific positions with this class and SG and C were two of the four. Time to get a VC from McLeod.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:13 am
by reef
Oh well it's obvious AW wants to play in a P5 so we wish him well

Our staff has done great targeting Bishop and Walker then refocusing when they blow us off

Grab MCLeod then that's a very solid back to back classes which sets us up to be top of conf for the next 5 years

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 8:18 am
by ace
If you are saying they looked at how the Walker situation was shaping up and saw the writing on the wall, and they jumped really early on Mading, ok. If you are saying they looked at Mading and Walker, with their respective offer lists and visit schedule, and said Mading is the better player, that’s a much tougher sell.

Is any A10 program going to land a top 100 guy?

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:26 am
by rhodyblue12
No one would ever say that Mading > Walker. That's insane.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:30 am
by ace
rhodyblue12 wrote: 5 years ago No one would ever say that Mading > Walker. That's insane.
It is, and yet...

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:40 am
by ace
DC_Rams wrote: 5 years ago
ace wrote: 5 years ago
adam914 wrote: 5 years ago Not ideal to miss out on your top two targets in the same cycle. McLeod is a must have at this point.
Hard to sugarcoat it- it sucks to not get an official visit from Bishop and to not make Walker’s final four. McLeod seems like a lock, or as much as one can be without actually committing. The positive is that the resulting class potentially has a high ceiling, but there also seems to be a much lower floor.

There’s always two sides to every recruiting story, but I can’t imagine URI cutting him off over a week’s time. With that list, it seems like Walker wants a different path.
You miss 100% of the shots you don’t take.

When we start winning under a new regime, the recruits will come.
I agree, but you’re the one who yelled at anyone who suggested there might be a transition phase with the change in staff.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 10:18 am
by DC_Rams
Ace, where the hell did I say that? You go from a proven head coach to a first time head coach there are going to be some transition pains. It is what it is.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 10:47 am
by TruePoint
That’s true, and I’m also not at all convinced that if we had the exact same staff as last year that Bishop and Walker would be in this class. Especially Walker, unless Dan had figured a way to get URI into the ACC this offseason. The last class under the old staff was excellent, and they’d had other random hits, but it is revisionist history to make it seem like we were just lining up home run class after home run class every year. This URI class, if it includes McLeod, will be competitive from a ranking standpoint with most classes since Hurley was first hired with the exception of last year. It may not include the one sure-fire guy like an EC or Jared, but as an overall class it is pretty good. It reminds me a bit of the 2016 class - we took four guys and half of them hit. Ideally you’d prefer that you get at least something from all of the guys but if two of these guys are potential all-league players going into their junior years then we will be in good shape.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 11:05 am
by CT Rhody
TruePoint wrote: 5 years ago That’s true, and I’m also not at all convinced that if we had the exact same staff as last year that Bishop and Walker would be in this class. Especially Walker, unless Dan had figured a way to get URI into the ACC this offseason. The last class under the old staff was excellent, and they’d had other random hits, but it is revisionist history to make it seem like we were just lining up home run class after home run class every year. This URI class, if it includes McLeod, will be competitive from a ranking standpoint with most classes since Hurley was first hired with the exception of last year. It may not include the one sure-fire guy like an EC or Jared, but as an overall class it is pretty good. It reminds me a bit of the 2016 class - we took four guys and half of them hit. Ideally you’d prefer that you get at least something from all of the guys but if two of these guys are potential all-league players going into their junior years then we will be in good shape.
This is where perception has been altered around here. That 2016 class had four players between 267 and 326 according to 247Sports. This class has 3 top 200 players and one in that 300 range. Hopefully we hit on 3 of the 4 with the increased talent.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 11:10 am
by TruePoint
Yes, totally agree with you that on paper this class is better. I was just making the point that if we end up with a Jeff and a Cyril out of this class, and maybe the other two guys turn into a TJ (have always like him as a comp for long) and an Akele (think he’s the floor for Mading) then this class will end up being a key part of multiple really good URI teams.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 11:20 am
by CT Rhody
TruePoint wrote: 5 years ago Yes, totally agree with you that on paper this class is better. I was just making the point that if we end up with a Jeff and a Cyril out of this class, and maybe the other two guys turn into a TJ (have always like him as a comp for long) and a Akele (thing he’s the floor for Mading) then this class will end up being a key part of multiple really good URI teams.
Completely agree, that’s a reasonable take for sure.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 11:56 am
by RamStock
TruePoint wrote: 5 years ago That’s true, and I’m also not at all convinced that if we had the exact same staff as last year that Bishop and Walker would be in this class. Especially Walker, unless Dan had figured a way to get URI into the ACC this offseason. The last class under the old staff was excellent, and they’d had other random hits, but it is revisionist history to make it seem like we were just lining up home run class after home run class every year. This URI class, if it includes McLeod, will be competitive from a ranking standpoint with most classes since Hurley was first hired with the exception of last year. It may not include the one sure-fire guy like an EC or Jared, but as an overall class it is pretty good. It reminds me a bit of the 2016 class - we took four guys and half of them hit. Ideally you’d prefer that you get at least something from all of the guys but if two of these guys are potential all-league players going into their junior years then we will be in good shape.
This is a fair point. If we hit on two of the four recruits if we land McLeod it will be a successful class. It isn’t inconceivable that Hammonds is on the same level as Bishop. He has just played lower level competition to this point.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:55 am
by reef
That is true I think with this solid 4 man class there is a shot that all 4 can be contributors to solid teams in their time at URI.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 10:52 am
by Seawrightspostgame
TruePoint wrote: 5 years ago Yes, totally agree with you that on paper this class is better. I was just making the point that if we end up with a Jeff and a Cyril out of this class, and maybe the other two guys turn into a TJ (have always like him as a comp for long) and an Akele (think he’s the floor for Mading) then this class will end up being a key part of multiple really good URI teams.
I know this is not on topic but I have always compared Akele to Milosevich. I think Milosevich was a bit better. For some reason I feel Akele digressed each year and was barely useful last year. Echos of Akeem Richmond. Akele was like a 40% 3point shooter his freshman year.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 10:57 am
by ace
DC_Rams wrote: 5 years ago Ace, where the hell did I say that? You go from a proven head coach to a first time head coach there are going to be some transition pains. It is what it is.
Your numerous posts that gave Dave credit for almost everything that happened regarding recruiting the last few years and insisting that it would just be more of the same. He’s your guy, I get it.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 11:15 am
by URIRecruitingInfo
It is more of the same.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 12:19 pm
by DC_Rams
ace wrote: 5 years ago
DC_Rams wrote: 5 years ago Ace, where the hell did I say that? You go from a proven head coach to a first time head coach there are going to be some transition pains. It is what it is.
Your numerous posts that gave Dave credit for almost everything that happened regarding recruiting the last few years and insisting that it would just be more of the same. He’s your guy, I get it.
Yes, as much as DH is yours, to a nauseating degree, at this point.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:32 pm
by Seawrightspostgame
Imagine explaining to the Board in 2011 or 2012 that there would be a battle between a Dan Hurley surrogate and a David Cox surrogate in a recruiting thread for a top 100 forward who chose to go with the ACC over URI.


October 2018: "Oh yea, then Hurley took the job at UConn...."


April 2011: "BACK UP. BACK UP. URI MADE THE TOURNAMENT AND WON GAMES!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?????? TWO YEARS IN A ROW??!?!?!?!?"

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2018 10:25 am
by RamStock

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2018 4:49 pm
by URI_05
Miami

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:05 pm
by ace
Walker and Wong are the start of a nice class for Miami.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:08 pm
by Rhody83
I am glad it isn’t Pitt. He was never going to pick Rhody over Miami. He chased the best P5 team that wanted him.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Offer)

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:11 pm
by ace
Maybe Pitt will get Wahab? Or somebody, anybody?

My guess for Wahab is Georgetown, though.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2018 7:31 pm
by Rhody83
From Walker on choosing Miami.
“They also talked about all the guys they sent to the NBA and how I reminded them of some of those guys and just said that if I keep working hard, that I can end up playing at that level.”

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2018 8:29 pm
by reckless jake
Rhody83 wrote: 5 years ago From Walker on choosing Miami.
“They also talked about all the guys they sent to the NBA and how I reminded them of some of those guys and just said that if I keep working hard, that I can end up playing at that level.”
Kids eat up that bullshit recruiting pap about playing in the league like it's ice cream. It's sell me on my own dream kind of stuff.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2018 8:48 pm
by KevanBoyles
F that #GoRhody

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 9:00 pm
by Rhody83
Not starting for Brewster. Avg 13 minutes per game.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 9:23 pm
by CT Rhody
Apparently he is there for the practice 🤷‍♂️

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 9:38 am
by Ramulous
Seems like our new Ant Walker may be the answer to losing this Ant Walker

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 9:37 pm
by steviep123
Ramulous wrote: 5 years ago Seems like our new Ant Walker may be the answer to losing this Ant Walker
Honestly, I saw this title and thought, "what the heck happened" then I realized it was a different Walker

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 3:17 pm
by Tjrams91
Another kid I think that may hit the portal.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 5:50 pm
by reef
How he do this year ?? Stats ??

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 6:24 pm
by RamStock
He knew what he was getting into when he went to the ACC

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 6:30 pm
by Tjrams91
reef wrote: 4 years ago How he do this year ?? Stats ??
Hardly any stats.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 6:40 pm
by RhodyMadness072
He would have to sit tho. With the new rule you will only be eligible if you haven't transferred before.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 7:12 pm
by Rhody83
Tjrams91 wrote: 4 years ago Another kid I think that may hit the portal.
What are you basing this on? Your gut reaction? Pretty weak speculating that a kid is going to transfer unless you have some facts to support it.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 7:27 pm
by Tjrams91
Rhody83 wrote: 4 years ago
Tjrams91 wrote: 4 years ago Another kid I think that may hit the portal.
What are you basing this on? Your gut reaction? Pretty weak speculating that a kid is going to transfer unless you have some facts to support it.
Isn’t that what message boards are for?

He hardly played. He was promised a starting spot.

Based on how kids seem to be responding to lack of PT, I think he may transfer.

Keywords - I THINK

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 7:31 pm
by DevRam
Tjrams91 wrote: 4 years ago
Rhody83 wrote: 4 years ago
Tjrams91 wrote: 4 years ago Another kid I think that may hit the portal.
What are you basing this on? Your gut reaction? Pretty weak speculating that a kid is going to transfer unless you have some facts to support it.
Isn’t that what message boards are for?

He hardly played. He was promised a starting spot.

Based on how kids seem to be responding to lack of PT, I think he may transfer.

Keywords - I THINK
Somewhat fair, but 12 minutes a game as a Freshman in the ACC isn’t that bad. Who knows what his development and teams plans for next year are m. I don’t

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 7:36 pm
by Rhody83
Tjrams91 wrote: 4 years ago
Rhody83 wrote: 4 years ago
Tjrams91 wrote: 4 years ago Another kid I think that may hit the portal.
What are you basing this on? Your gut reaction? Pretty weak speculating that a kid is going to transfer unless you have some facts to support it.
Isn’t that what message boards are for?

He hardly played. He was promised a starting spot.

Based on how kids seem to be responding to lack of PT, I think he may transfer.

Keywords - I THINK
He was promised a starting spot??? What is your source for that - Walker, his Coach, media that cover U Miami BB? You are just making this up. I would bet he wasn’t promised a starting spot. College coaches don’t do that.

He averaged 13 minutes/game as a Freshman.

Your speculative transfer list would include every Fr that didn’t have good stats or a lot of playing time.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 7:43 pm
by rambone 78
Isn't that what Jacob got this season here? 13 minutes a game?

Does that mean he wants out?

I hope the hell not.

Actually he probably got more than he would have, if Tate had stayed.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 10:49 pm
by Tjrams91
Rhody83 wrote: 4 years ago
Tjrams91 wrote: 4 years ago
Rhody83 wrote: 4 years ago

What are you basing this on? Your gut reaction? Pretty weak speculating that a kid is going to transfer unless you have some facts to support it.
Isn’t that what message boards are for?

He hardly played. He was promised a starting spot.

Based on how kids seem to be responding to lack of PT, I think he may transfer.

Keywords - I THINK
He was promised a starting spot??? What is your source for that - Walker, his Coach, media that cover U Miami BB? You are just making this up. I would bet he wasn’t promised a starting spot. College coaches don’t do that.

He averaged 13 minutes/game as a Freshman.

Your speculative transfer list would include every Fr that didn’t have good stats or a lot of playing time.
He played zero minutes today.

Miami promised him he’d start. That’s from his HS coach. I saw the kid play a lot in high school, lived 10-15 minutes away so I somewhat know his coaches and family.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 11:33 pm
by rhodylaw
rambone 78 wrote: 4 years ago Isn't that what Jacob got this season here? 13 minutes a game?

Does that mean he wants out?

I hope the hell not.

Actually he probably got more than he would have, if Tate had stayed.
This is no offense to Jacob’s potential - but I don’t think he gets many more minutes on a good team than he did here. His body needs to develop. Walker was ready day one physically to play a starters role.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2020 8:45 am
by rhodyblue12
Walker was the player I wanted most in last year's recruiting cycle. If it happens, he will get lots of attention.

Bryce Aiken just appeared in the portal. Interesting, but will likely get P5 looks.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2020 9:37 am
by Tjrams91
I thought Aiken has been in the portal all season.

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2020 11:35 am
by Dino611
Tjrams91 wrote: 4 years ago I thought Aiken has been in the portal all season.
Your prob thinking of Seth Towns who put his name in the portal earlier In the year

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2020 12:44 pm
by rhodyblue12
Tjrams91 wrote: 4 years ago I thought Aiken has been in the portal all season.
Maybe just new to me. Likely going to Kentucky

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2020 1:04 pm
by RhodyMadness072
With the Ivy League not allowing 5th year players it was known all year that Bryce Aiken would end up in the portal. He most likely just got final confirmation that he would be graduating on time and therefore is eligible to put himself into the portal

Re: ‘19 MD F Anthony Walker (Miami Commit)

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2020 1:26 pm
by Tjrams91
Dino611 wrote: 4 years ago
Tjrams91 wrote: 4 years ago I thought Aiken has been in the portal all season.
Your prob thinking of Seth Towns who put his name in the portal earlier In the year
You’re right. I stand corrected.