Re: FIRE COX
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2021 7:52 am
Right on Ramster,let’s hold on to our hopes. With more discipline and some slight adjustments we could be good. Telling week ahead. Go rams
I don't think people expect Cox to get fired now? Cox is going to remain as the head coach this season as he should. I think everyone knows that.ramster wrote: ↑2 years ago This Fire Cox thread originated following the loss to Florida Gulf Coast last Tuesday
My thoughts and observations from that game:
We were only favored by 4.5 points in a true road game. We lost by 1 point - a 5.5 point gap.
We shot only 3-15 on all important 3P's. Sheppard 1-6 and Martin 0-4. Sheppard did not have the type of game he had in Daytona shooting only 3-10 FG with 4 Turnovers and never got to the FT line to score only 7 points.
Defensively I saw El-Amin start guarding Tavian Dunn-Martin, then Sheppard, Leggett sometimes switched off on Dunn-Martin, sometimes Martin and Thomas. Dunn-Marin scored 26 on 8-13 shooting but did commit 6 costly Turnovers.
FGCU hit 11-26 3P's for 33 points via 3P's while we had only 9 points on 3 P's.
We could have had this game in the last 2 minutes doing some good things and some not so good:
- 1:50 left down 60-62 Malik Martin fouled big man Kevin Samuel who hit 1 of 2 FTs making it 60-63
- 1:25 left El-Amin made a nice drive to the middle and hit about a 8' jumper in the lane - huge clutch shot to make it 62-63
- :33 left After a Dunn-Martin miss Makhi Mitchell with a great dunk assisted by Makhel to make it 64-63 Rhody!!!
- :20 left Dunn-Martin gets a layup - ARRRGGGHHHH!! 64-65 we are behind
- :07 left Malik Martin gets fouled and hits a huge, huge FT to tie the game and FGCU calls timeout to ice Martin
- :07 left Martin makes the 2nd FT putting URI ahead!!!!!
- :03 seconds left Sheppard fouls Dunn-Martin about 15 feet from the half court line. Inexplicably.
- :03 seconds left Dunn-Martin calmly sinks the first to tie and URI calls timeout to ice Dunn-Martin
- :03 seconds left Dunn-Martin calmly sinks the 2nd FT to make it 66-67
- :02 seconds left Dunn-Martin smartly fouls since FGCU had a foul to give running time off the clock
- At buzzer Makhi Mitchell gets off about a 28' 3P attempt whereby he had a good look at the hoop. Shot was on line and just a little bit long hitting the back of the rim. Could easily have been a huge game winner but just missed. Good play call by URI and execution
Bottom line we lost on the road to a team we were 4.5 points favored over. We had an off shooting night compared to our norm. Walker had to deal with a leg injury.
The foul by Sheppard was not good at all. The URI Coach did not call for that foul, I am sure. Just a mistake by a guy who made the All Tournament Team in Daytona 2 days earlier. It happens, we move on and learn.
I do not think this result warranted a FIRE COX thread. I don't think we should have a FIRE COX thread at all at any time all season.
Thorr Bjorn did not extend David Cox' Contract nor give him a pay increase. I am pretty sure that David Cox must make the NCAA Tournament this year to get a Contract Extension and without a Contract Extension who knows. But I also think he deserves this season to make the NCAA Tournament just like I said of Dan Hurley in the Jim Baron 2.0 immortal thread. Let the season play out. Give the Coaching Staff and the Players support as they focus on making the NCAA Tournament. If David Cox gets close by winning 24 games or more and just misses the NCAA then sure there could be some situation whereby he gets a Contract Extension but more than likely it will be David Cox either wins the A10 Tournament or comes up fairly short of that goal. We will know in 3.5 months.
This team can do it. They can win the A10 Tournament. Likely the only way any of the 14 A10 Teams make the NCAA Tournament is to win the A10 Tournament in March. Likely only 1 team goes from the A10 so why not us? Why not URI?
The Mitchell Brothers are playing well and will only get better as the season mo yes along. They can rebound, pass, block shots, shoot and run the floor well. They are clearly enjoying playing together and with their teammates. Sheppard, Leggett, El-Amin, Martin and Walker have shown then can effectively shoot the 3 ball. A host of players already have more than 10 assists on the short season as passing has been noticeably unselfish. Martin and Walker bring size, strength and experience off the bench. This team can win the A10 - I believed this before the season and still do after watching these 1st 7 games.
Thorr and the URI President will make the right moves. We don't need to help them make their decision especially after only 6 games with a thread as negative as this one. The A10 Tournament is the key for evry A10 Team.
Cox's best wins, per KenPom. Only looked at Top 50 teams:
Ya, I think we have one marquee win. Beating VCU in the A10 tournament.SmartyBarrett wrote: ↑2 years agoCox's best wins, per KenPom. Only looked at Top 50 teams:
2018-19: Beat #42 VCU (twice) - once at home, once at a neutral site (A-10 tournament)
2019-20: Beat #40 Providence at home
2020-21: Beat #32 St. Bonaventure at home, beat #48 VCU on the road
Depends on how you want to classify "marquee", but some nice wins for sure.
Overall, Rhody is 5-9 against KenPom top 50 teams in the Cox era.
We can't change the classification of marquee. Those are ranked wins. Top 25. If you wanted to expand it - marquee could include a top 25 victory, an A-10 title, or an NCAA victory.SmartyBarrett wrote: ↑2 years agoCox's best wins, per KenPom. Only looked at Top 50 teams:
2018-19: Beat #42 VCU (twice) - once at home, once at a neutral site (A-10 tournament)
2019-20: Beat #40 Providence at home
2020-21: Beat #32 St. Bonaventure at home, beat #48 VCU on the road
Depends on how you want to classify "marquee", but some nice wins for sure.
Overall, Rhody is 5-9 against KenPom top 50 teams in the Cox era.
but there isn't and there isn't so we're average. soooooooo there's that.Exeter ram wrote: ↑2 years ago Right on Ramster,let’s hold on to our hopes. With more discipline and some slight adjustments we could be good. Telling week ahead. Go rams
THANK. YOU.BlackDogRants wrote: ↑2 years ago I honestly can’t believe how content some of you are with this team being just OK. It baffles my mind. Like I’m ready to rent a billboard on 95 to spark a coaching change.
Stop settling! It’s been proven with the right formula this program could compete at a high level. This “is what it is”, “we are what we are” fan based opinion isn’t helping.
Also… FYI: Wanting to see something better by seeing a change doesn’t make you unsupportive of the team or a bad fan.
The right formula, yes. But more specifically, the right person.....Kraft, Penders, Harrick, HurleyBlackDogRants wrote: ↑2 years ago I honestly can’t believe how content some of you are with this team being just OK. It baffles my mind. Like I’m ready to rent a billboard on 95 to spark a coaching change.
Stop settling! It’s been proven with the right formula this program could compete at a high level. This “is what it is”, “we are what we are” fan based opinion isn’t helping.
Also… FYI: Wanting to see something better by seeing a change doesn’t make you unsupportive of the team or a bad fan.
It’s not me settling. End of season it’s make the NCAA or don’t.Blue Man wrote: ↑2 years agoTHANK. YOU.BlackDogRants wrote: ↑2 years ago I honestly can’t believe how content some of you are with this team being just OK. It baffles my mind. Like I’m ready to rent a billboard on 95 to spark a coaching change.
Stop settling! It’s been proven with the right formula this program could compete at a high level. This “is what it is”, “we are what we are” fan based opinion isn’t helping.
Also… FYI: Wanting to see something better by seeing a change doesn’t make you unsupportive of the team or a bad fan.
I’m not even sure what you’re disagreeing with here, then? How else do you want fans to express how they feel about the coaching situation and the state of the program? Is it just that you wish the title of the thread were more nuanced “FIRE COX IN APRIL IF THE TEAM DOES NOT PULL AN NCAA APPEARANCE OUT OF ITS ASS THAT WE HAVE NO REALISTIC REASON TO EXPECT AT THIS POINT BASED ON WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS” seems like a mouthful for this type of thing.ramster wrote: ↑2 years agoIt’s not me settling. End of season it’s make the NCAA or don’t.Blue Man wrote: ↑2 years agoTHANK. YOU.BlackDogRants wrote: ↑2 years ago I honestly can’t believe how content some of you are with this team being just OK. It baffles my mind. Like I’m ready to rent a billboard on 95 to spark a coaching change.
Stop settling! It’s been proven with the right formula this program could compete at a high level. This “is what it is”, “we are what we are” fan based opinion isn’t helping.
Also… FYI: Wanting to see something better by seeing a change doesn’t make you unsupportive of the team or a bad fan.
No contract has been extended and no raise given.
I just put this out there... I'm not trying to make a point one way or the other. KenPom is my go-to for anything like this because I think it's more indicative of how good a team was over a full season rather than if they happened to be in the top 25 in a given week.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑2 years agoYa, I think we have one marquee win. Beating VCU in the A10 tournament.SmartyBarrett wrote: ↑2 years agoCox's best wins, per KenPom. Only looked at Top 50 teams:
2018-19: Beat #42 VCU (twice) - once at home, once at a neutral site (A-10 tournament)
2019-20: Beat #40 Providence at home
2020-21: Beat #32 St. Bonaventure at home, beat #48 VCU on the road
Depends on how you want to classify "marquee", but some nice wins for sure.
Overall, Rhody is 5-9 against KenPom top 50 teams in the Cox era.
I despised the title Jim Baron 2.0. 99% of posters were very down on Hurley. As 1% I supported Hurley and urged to wait for the season to end. Rest is history. Then the thread got locked.TruePoint wrote: ↑2 years agoI’m not even sure what you’re disagreeing with here, then? How else do you want fans to express how they feel about the coaching situation and the state of the program? Is it just that you wish the title of the thread were more nuanced “FIRE COX IN APRIL IF THE TEAM DOES NOT PULL AN NCAA APPEARANCE OUT OF ITS ASS THAT WE HAVE NO REALISTIC REASON TO EXPECT AT THIS POINT BASED ON WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS” seems like a mouthful for this type of thing.
They’re all safe hiding behind keyboards.ramster wrote: ↑2 years agoI despised the title Jim Baron 2.0. 99% of posters were very down on Hurley. As 1% I supported Hurley and urged to wait for the season to end. Rest is history. Then the thread got locked.TruePoint wrote: ↑2 years agoI’m not even sure what you’re disagreeing with here, then? How else do you want fans to express how they feel about the coaching situation and the state of the program? Is it just that you wish the title of the thread were more nuanced “FIRE COX IN APRIL IF THE TEAM DOES NOT PULL AN NCAA APPEARANCE OUT OF ITS ASS THAT WE HAVE NO REALISTIC REASON TO EXPECT AT THIS POINT BASED ON WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS” seems like a mouthful for this type of thing.
This is the same or worse to have Capital Letters FIRE COX. Just title it "David Cox" is all that is needed with no CAPS. Capitalizing means SCREAMING or LOUD to FIRE COX.
We are only 7 games into the season. We are 5-2. Ranked #3 in A10 by Ken Pom. It is very early. A long way to go.
Remaining OOC with only 2 games at home. Let's play out the season before firing the coach, as we learned from Jim Baron 2.0
@ Harvard
@ PC
Sacred Heart
@ Milwaukee
(N) College of Charleston
Brown
Players, fans, visitors from other team message boards, families of players/coaches, friends or players/coaches, etc read the boards. I get commenting on the Coaches and Players - just don't feel right about a FIRE COX title.
David Cox or David Cox Performance as a title would suffice imho.
Jim Baron 2.0 was not capitalized by the way
I hope we get to kill and lock this thread up too
viewtopic.php?t=6468
Forget after the Fordham loss in 2016-17, after scanning that thread quickly, anybody that thinks this thread and board are bad now are simply incapable of reading this board from December of 2016.ramster wrote: ↑2 years agoI despised the title Jim Baron 2.0. 99% of posters were very down on Hurley. As 1% I supported Hurley and urged to wait for the season to end. Rest is history. Then the thread got locked.TruePoint wrote: ↑2 years agoI’m not even sure what you’re disagreeing with here, then? How else do you want fans to express how they feel about the coaching situation and the state of the program? Is it just that you wish the title of the thread were more nuanced “FIRE COX IN APRIL IF THE TEAM DOES NOT PULL AN NCAA APPEARANCE OUT OF ITS ASS THAT WE HAVE NO REALISTIC REASON TO EXPECT AT THIS POINT BASED ON WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS” seems like a mouthful for this type of thing.
This is the same or worse to have Capital Letters FIRE COX. Just title it "David Cox" is all that is needed with no CAPS. Capitalizing means SCREAMING or LOUD to FIRE COX.
We are only 7 games into the season. We are 5-2. Ranked #3 in A10 by Ken Pom. It is very early. A long way to go.
Remaining OOC with only 2 games at home. Let's play out the season before firing the coach, as we learned from Jim Baron 2.0
@ Harvard
@ PC
Sacred Heart
@ Milwaukee
(N) College of Charleston
Brown
Players, fans, visitors from other team message boards, families of players/coaches, friends or players/coaches, etc read the boards. I get commenting on the Coaches and Players - just don't feel right about a FIRE COX title.
David Cox or David Cox Performance as a title would suffice imho.
Jim Baron 2.0 was not capitalized by the way
I hope we get to kill and lock this thread up too
viewtopic.php?t=6468
DC_Rams wrote: ↑2 years agoThey’re all safe hiding behind keyboards.ramster wrote: ↑2 years agoI despised the title Jim Baron 2.0. 99% of posters were very down on Hurley. As 1% I supported Hurley and urged to wait for the season to end. Rest is history. Then the thread got locked.TruePoint wrote: ↑2 years ago
I’m not even sure what you’re disagreeing with here, then? How else do you want fans to express how they feel about the coaching situation and the state of the program? Is it just that you wish the title of the thread were more nuanced “FIRE COX IN APRIL IF THE TEAM DOES NOT PULL AN NCAA APPEARANCE OUT OF ITS ASS THAT WE HAVE NO REALISTIC REASON TO EXPECT AT THIS POINT BASED ON WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS” seems like a mouthful for this type of thing.
This is the same or worse to have Capital Letters FIRE COX. Just title it "David Cox" is all that is needed with no CAPS. Capitalizing means SCREAMING or LOUD to FIRE COX.
We are only 7 games into the season. We are 5-2. Ranked #3 in A10 by Ken Pom. It is very early. A long way to go.
Remaining OOC with only 2 games at home. Let's play out the season before firing the coach, as we learned from Jim Baron 2.0
@ Harvard
@ PC
Sacred Heart
@ Milwaukee
(N) College of Charleston
Brown
Players, fans, visitors from other team message boards, families of players/coaches, friends or players/coaches, etc read the boards. I get commenting on the Coaches and Players - just don't feel right about a FIRE COX title.
David Cox or David Cox Performance as a title would suffice imho.
Jim Baron 2.0 was not capitalized by the way
I hope we get to kill and lock this thread up too
viewtopic.php?t=6468
Your message will fall on deaf ears, however, I certainly appreciate the civility and level headed approach.
you can change the thread title but it doesn't dilute the content of the mostly warranted previous 5 pages.ramster wrote: ↑2 years agoI despised the title Jim Baron 2.0. 99% of posters were very down on Hurley. As 1% I supported Hurley and urged to wait for the season to end. Rest is history. Then the thread got locked.TruePoint wrote: ↑2 years agoI’m not even sure what you’re disagreeing with here, then? How else do you want fans to express how they feel about the coaching situation and the state of the program? Is it just that you wish the title of the thread were more nuanced “FIRE COX IN APRIL IF THE TEAM DOES NOT PULL AN NCAA APPEARANCE OUT OF ITS ASS THAT WE HAVE NO REALISTIC REASON TO EXPECT AT THIS POINT BASED ON WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS” seems like a mouthful for this type of thing.
This is the same or worse to have Capital Letters FIRE COX. Just title it "David Cox" is all that is needed with no CAPS. Capitalizing means SCREAMING or LOUD to FIRE COX.
We are only 7 games into the season. We are 5-2. Ranked #3 in A10 by Ken Pom. It is very early. A long way to go.
Remaining OOC with only 2 games at home. Let's play out the season before firing the coach, as we learned from Jim Baron 2.0
@ Harvard
@ PC
Sacred Heart
@ Milwaukee
(N) College of Charleston
Brown
Players, fans, visitors from other team message boards, families of players/coaches, friends or players/coaches, etc read the boards. I get commenting on the Coaches and Players - just don't feel right about a FIRE COX title.
David Cox or David Cox Performance as a title would suffice imho.
Jim Baron 2.0 was not capitalized by the way
I hope we get to kill and lock this thread up too
viewtopic.php?t=6468
hahaha hiding behind keyboards?DC_Rams wrote: ↑2 years agoThey're all safe hiding behind keyboards.ramster wrote: ↑2 years agoI despised the title Jim Baron 2.0. 99% of posters were very down on Hurley. As 1% I supported Hurley and urged to wait for the season to end. Rest is history. Then the thread got locked.TruePoint wrote: ↑2 years ago
I'm not even sure what you're disagreeing with here, then? How else do you want fans to express how they feel about the coaching situation and the state of the program? Is it just that you wish the title of the thread were more nuanced "FIRE COX IN APRIL IF THE TEAM DOES NOT PULL AN NCAA APPEARANCE OUT OF ITS ASS THAT WE HAVE NO REALISTIC REASON TO EXPECT AT THIS POINT BASED ON WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS" seems like a mouthful for this type of thing.
This is the same or worse to have Capital Letters FIRE COX. Just title it "David Cox" is all that is needed with no CAPS. Capitalizing means SCREAMING or LOUD to FIRE COX.
We are only 7 games into the season. We are 5-2. Ranked #3 in A10 by Ken Pom. It is very early. A long way to go.
Remaining OOC with only 2 games at home. Let's play out the season before firing the coach, as we learned from Jim Baron 2.0
@ Harvard
@ PC
Sacred Heart
@ Milwaukee
(N) College of Charleston
Brown
Players, fans, visitors from other team message boards, families of players/coaches, friends or players/coaches, etc read the boards. I get commenting on the Coaches and Players - just don't feel right about a FIRE COX title.
David Cox or David Cox Performance as a title would suffice imho.
Jim Baron 2.0 was not capitalized by the way
I hope we get to kill and lock this thread up too
viewtopic.php?t=6468
Your message will fall on deaf ears, however, I certainly appreciate the civility and level headed approach.
Note that there is already a David Cox thread and now we have a FIRE COX thread. But the Covid takes were removed from the FIRE COX thread yesterday, yet the FIRE COX thread itself is redundant.TruePoint wrote: ↑2 years agoI’m not even sure what you’re disagreeing with here, then? How else do you want fans to express how they feel about the coaching situation and the state of the program? Is it just that you wish the title of the thread were more nuanced “FIRE COX IN APRIL IF THE TEAM DOES NOT PULL AN NCAA APPEARANCE OUT OF ITS ASS THAT WE HAVE NO REALISTIC REASON TO EXPECT AT THIS POINT BASED ON WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS” seems like a mouthful for this type of thing.
Of course it makes sense. Did Richmond boosters erect a billboard called Mooney? No it was FIRE MOONEY!!!ramster wrote: ↑2 years agoNote that there is already a David Cox thread and now we have a FIRE COX thread. Makes no sense.TruePoint wrote: ↑2 years agoI’m not even sure what you’re disagreeing with here, then? How else do you want fans to express how they feel about the coaching situation and the state of the program? Is it just that you wish the title of the thread were more nuanced “FIRE COX IN APRIL IF THE TEAM DOES NOT PULL AN NCAA APPEARANCE OUT OF ITS ASS THAT WE HAVE NO REALISTIC REASON TO EXPECT AT THIS POINT BASED ON WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS” seems like a mouthful for this type of thing.
I mean... They seem like different topics to me. One thread is calling for Cox to be fired, while the other is just about him. There is overlap in those two topics, which we typically - but not always - allow. If you find an entire topic distasteful, I suggest resisting the temptation to visit it.ramster wrote: ↑2 years agoNote that there is already a David Cox thread and now we have a FIRE COX thread. But the Covid takes were removed from the FIRE COX thread yesterday, yet the FIRE COX thread itself is redundant.TruePoint wrote: ↑2 years agoI’m not even sure what you’re disagreeing with here, then? How else do you want fans to express how they feel about the coaching situation and the state of the program? Is it just that you wish the title of the thread were more nuanced “FIRE COX IN APRIL IF THE TEAM DOES NOT PULL AN NCAA APPEARANCE OUT OF ITS ASS THAT WE HAVE NO REALISTIC REASON TO EXPECT AT THIS POINT BASED ON WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS” seems like a mouthful for this type of thing.
You think maybe it just means we're all about what's best for the program and have a pretty good hit rate on calling it like we see it?RhowdyRam02 wrote: ↑2 years agoForget after the Fordham loss in 2016-17, after scanning that thread quickly, anybody that thinks this thread and board are bad now are simply incapable of reading this board from December of 2016.ramster wrote: ↑2 years agoI despised the title Jim Baron 2.0. 99% of posters were very down on Hurley. As 1% I supported Hurley and urged to wait for the season to end. Rest is history. Then the thread got locked.TruePoint wrote: ↑2 years ago
I’m not even sure what you’re disagreeing with here, then? How else do you want fans to express how they feel about the coaching situation and the state of the program? Is it just that you wish the title of the thread were more nuanced “FIRE COX IN APRIL IF THE TEAM DOES NOT PULL AN NCAA APPEARANCE OUT OF ITS ASS THAT WE HAVE NO REALISTIC REASON TO EXPECT AT THIS POINT BASED ON WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS” seems like a mouthful for this type of thing.
This is the same or worse to have Capital Letters FIRE COX. Just title it "David Cox" is all that is needed with no CAPS. Capitalizing means SCREAMING or LOUD to FIRE COX.
We are only 7 games into the season. We are 5-2. Ranked #3 in A10 by Ken Pom. It is very early. A long way to go.
Remaining OOC with only 2 games at home. Let's play out the season before firing the coach, as we learned from Jim Baron 2.0
@ Harvard
@ PC
Sacred Heart
@ Milwaukee
(N) College of Charleston
Brown
Players, fans, visitors from other team message boards, families of players/coaches, friends or players/coaches, etc read the boards. I get commenting on the Coaches and Players - just don't feel right about a FIRE COX title.
David Cox or David Cox Performance as a title would suffice imho.
Jim Baron 2.0 was not capitalized by the way
I hope we get to kill and lock this thread up too
viewtopic.php?t=6468
I find it interesting that the two most positive people in that thread (BlueMan and I) are the most negative people now...
hahahhahaBillyboy78 wrote: ↑2 years ago I'm glad I have my keyboard here in case DC Rams shows up at my house to beat me up for criticizing his idol. I could use it as a shield. Or maybe even a weapon!
That thread was a fun trip down memory lane, including what remains my personal best post of all time (in my humble opinion of course) viewtopic.php?p=316752#p316752RhowdyRam02 wrote: ↑2 years ago
Forget after the Fordham loss in 2016-17, after scanning that thread quickly, anybody that thinks this thread and board are bad now are simply incapable of reading this board from December of 2016.
I find it interesting that the two most positive people in that thread (BlueMan and I) are the most negative people now...
We got what we wanted, and Hurley got what he wanted. Nothing like a little fire under that coaches ass to get them moving.adam914 wrote: ↑2 years agoThat thread was a fun trip down memory lane, including what remains my personal best post of all time (in my humble opinion of course) viewtopic.php?p=316752#p316752RhowdyRam02 wrote: ↑2 years ago
Forget after the Fordham loss in 2016-17, after scanning that thread quickly, anybody that thinks this thread and board are bad now are simply incapable of reading this board from December of 2016.
I find it interesting that the two most positive people in that thread (BlueMan and I) are the most negative people now...
I was trying to find the one where someone called me a Hurley ball licker, but it must have been in a different thread or maybe it got deleted. That was fun to.
FIRE COX is distasteful. Team is ranked #1 in RPI in the A10 and we have FIRE COX as a thread. Might as well fire all A10 coaches after only 7 games played.SGreenwell wrote: ↑2 years agoI mean... They seem like different topics to me. One thread is calling for Cox to be fired, while the other is just about him. There is overlap in those two topics, which we typically - but not always - allow. If you find an entire topic distasteful, I suggest resisting the temptation to visit it.ramster wrote: ↑2 years agoNote that there is already a David Cox thread and now we have a FIRE COX thread. But the Covid takes were removed from the FIRE COX thread yesterday, yet the FIRE COX thread itself is redundant.TruePoint wrote: ↑2 years ago
I’m not even sure what you’re disagreeing with here, then? How else do you want fans to express how they feel about the coaching situation and the state of the program? Is it just that you wish the title of the thread were more nuanced “FIRE COX IN APRIL IF THE TEAM DOES NOT PULL AN NCAA APPEARANCE OUT OF ITS ASS THAT WE HAVE NO REALISTIC REASON TO EXPECT AT THIS POINT BASED ON WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS” seems like a mouthful for this type of thing.
Distasteful was 10-15 last year. That is a taste I don't like.ramster wrote: ↑2 years agoFIRE COX is distasteful. Team is ranked #1 in RPI in the A10 and we have FIRE COX as a thread. Might as well fire all A10 coaches after only 7 games played.SGreenwell wrote: ↑2 years agoI mean... They seem like different topics to me. One thread is calling for Cox to be fired, while the other is just about him. There is overlap in those two topics, which we typically - but not always - allow. If you find an entire topic distasteful, I suggest resisting the temptation to visit it.
And while we are at it why did you delete my comment from the thread when you deleted the Covid comments? My comments had nothing to do with Covid yet you deleted mine. No problem I put it right back. Guess you didn’t like it.
I agree the title/thread is dumb, but please don’t use RPI as a metric. That is extremely outdated and nobody uses that anymore at all.ramster wrote: ↑2 years agoFIRE COX is distasteful. Team is ranked #1 in RPI in the A10 and we have FIRE COX as a thread. Might as well fire all A10 coaches after only 7 games played.SGreenwell wrote: ↑2 years agoI mean... They seem like different topics to me. One thread is calling for Cox to be fired, while the other is just about him. There is overlap in those two topics, which we typically - but not always - allow. If you find an entire topic distasteful, I suggest resisting the temptation to visit it.
And while we are at it why did you delete my comment from the thread when you deleted the Covid comments? My comments had nothing to do with Covid yet you deleted mine. No problem I put it right back. Guess you didn’t like it.
It's not after 7 games, it's after 95 games played.ramster wrote: ↑2 years agoFIRE COX is distasteful. Team is ranked #1 in RPI in the A10 and we have FIRE COX as a thread. Might as well fire all A10 coaches after only 7 games played.SGreenwell wrote: ↑2 years agoI mean... They seem like different topics to me. One thread is calling for Cox to be fired, while the other is just about him. There is overlap in those two topics, which we typically - but not always - allow. If you find an entire topic distasteful, I suggest resisting the temptation to visit it.
And while we are at it why did you delete my comment from the thread when you deleted the Covid comments? My comments had nothing to do with Covid yet you deleted mine. No problem I put it right back. Guess you didn’t like it.
I don't think Thorr should fire Cox yet. I may say it after a horrible loss because I probably think that at that moment, but I think he still deserves this season to turn things around. I will make a deal with you, though... If I feel that he should be fired, you get me in front of Cox, and I'll tell him how I truly feel. Then I'll find all the people you insulted on here, and you have to say the same insults to their faces?
I didn't realize you sat next to me . Not this year obviously I'm not attending, but all the years before.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑2 years agohahaha hiding behind keyboards?DC_Rams wrote: ↑2 years agoThey're all safe hiding behind keyboards.ramster wrote: ↑2 years ago
I despised the title Jim Baron 2.0. 99% of posters were very down on Hurley. As 1% I supported Hurley and urged to wait for the season to end. Rest is history. Then the thread got locked.
This is the same or worse to have Capital Letters FIRE COX. Just title it "David Cox" is all that is needed with no CAPS. Capitalizing means SCREAMING or LOUD to FIRE COX.
We are only 7 games into the season. We are 5-2. Ranked #3 in A10 by Ken Pom. It is very early. A long way to go.
Remaining OOC with only 2 games at home. Let's play out the season before firing the coach, as we learned from Jim Baron 2.0
@ Harvard
@ PC
Sacred Heart
@ Milwaukee
(N) College of Charleston
Brown
Players, fans, visitors from other team message boards, families of players/coaches, friends or players/coaches, etc read the boards. I get commenting on the Coaches and Players - just don't feel right about a FIRE COX title.
David Cox or David Cox Performance as a title would suffice imho.
Jim Baron 2.0 was not capitalized by the way
I hope we get to kill and lock this thread up too
viewtopic.php?t=6468
Your message will fall on deaf ears, however, I certainly appreciate the civility and level headed approach.
I sit in section 211, Row A Seat 8 and 9. I went to Daytona, and I'll be going to Harvard tomorrow. I'm the one screaming at Cox to call a timeout after our opponent goes on an 11-0 run.. I'm also the one that has praised him when he's coached a good game. It's called being a fan. This is a message board for FANS
If you want to come to talk to me in person, please do. I'm not hiding...
I actually sat in section 205 for a while but I was offered better seats this season so I came over to 211. Hopefully, you're back soon!theblueram wrote: ↑2 years agoI didn't realize you sat next to me . Not this year obviously I'm not attending, but all the years before.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑2 years agohahaha hiding behind keyboards?
I sit in section 211, Row A Seat 8 and 9. I went to Daytona, and I'll be going to Harvard tomorrow. I'm the one screaming at Cox to call a timeout after our opponent goes on an 11-0 run.. I'm also the one that has praised him when he's coached a good game. It's called being a fan. This is a message board for FANS
If you want to come to talk to me in person, please do. I'm not hiding...
Me too! If they end the mask mandate, I'm there tomorrow.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑2 years agoI actually sat in section 205 for a while but I was offered better seats this season so I came over to 211. Hopefully, you're back soon!theblueram wrote: ↑2 years agoI didn't realize you sat next to me . Not this year obviously I'm not attending, but all the years before.steveystuds06 wrote: ↑2 years ago
hahaha hiding behind keyboards?
I sit in section 211, Row A Seat 8 and 9. I went to Daytona, and I'll be going to Harvard tomorrow. I'm the one screaming at Cox to call a timeout after our opponent goes on an 11-0 run.. I'm also the one that has praised him when he's coached a good game. It's called being a fan. This is a message board for FANS
If you want to come to talk to me in person, please do. I'm not hiding...
I just went back and skimmed thru some of it and I was wondering why I wasn’t in there more, then I got to pg 11 and figured out the reason. Hard to argue with myself on this one.adam914 wrote: ↑2 years agoThat thread was a fun trip down memory lane, including what remains my personal best post of all time (in my humble opinion of course) viewtopic.php?p=316752#p316752RhowdyRam02 wrote: ↑2 years ago
Forget after the Fordham loss in 2016-17, after scanning that thread quickly, anybody that thinks this thread and board are bad now are simply incapable of reading this board from December of 2016.
I find it interesting that the two most positive people in that thread (BlueMan and I) are the most negative people now...
I was trying to find the one where someone called me a Hurley ball licker, but it must have been in a different thread or maybe it got deleted. That was fun to.
Potential to be good? Huh? Shouldn't we be good already?Rhody_NYCT wrote: ↑2 years ago I think this thread is ridiculous. I was really upset about the FGCU loss like all of us, but we do have a solid roster and still have the potential to be good. If people want to go off on the FIRE COX thread later in the season, if it's clear at that point that the team isn't going anywhere, then it's fair game. I will want a new coach too. But let's tale it easy right now. Give Cox and the team a chance. We are 5-2 with Harvard and PC coming up. Let's see what happens and at the very least, maintain support in the short term.
This ^^^^ is beautiful....steveystuds06 wrote: ↑2 years ago Mongo can you please change the title of this thread to FIRE COX IN APRIL IF THE TEAM DOES NOT PULL AN NCAA APPEARANCE OUT OF ITS ASS THAT WE HAVE NO REALISTIC REASON TO EXPECT AT THIS POINT BASED ON WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS
Thank you
I agree. Mongo want to change the title? LOLNYGFan_Section208 wrote: ↑2 years agoThis ^^^^ is beautiful....steveystuds06 wrote: ↑2 years ago Mongo can you please change the title of this thread to FIRE COX IN APRIL IF THE TEAM DOES NOT PULL AN NCAA APPEARANCE OUT OF ITS ASS THAT WE HAVE NO REALISTIC REASON TO EXPECT AT THIS POINT BASED ON WHAT WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS
Thank you
So in the Jim Baron 2.0 thread I supported giving Hurley the year while most all were running him out of town.Blue Man wrote: ↑2 years agoYou think maybe it just means we're all about what's best for the program and have a pretty good hit rate on calling it like we see it?RhowdyRam02 wrote: ↑2 years agoForget after the Fordham loss in 2016-17, after scanning that thread quickly, anybody that thinks this thread and board are bad now are simply incapable of reading this board from December of 2016.ramster wrote: ↑2 years ago
I despised the title Jim Baron 2.0. 99% of posters were very down on Hurley. As 1% I supported Hurley and urged to wait for the season to end. Rest is history. Then the thread got locked.
This is the same or worse to have Capital Letters FIRE COX. Just title it "David Cox" is all that is needed with no CAPS. Capitalizing means SCREAMING or LOUD to FIRE COX.
We are only 7 games into the season. We are 5-2. Ranked #3 in A10 by Ken Pom. It is very early. A long way to go.
Remaining OOC with only 2 games at home. Let's play out the season before firing the coach, as we learned from Jim Baron 2.0
@ Harvard
@ PC
Sacred Heart
@ Milwaukee
(N) College of Charleston
Brown
Players, fans, visitors from other team message boards, families of players/coaches, friends or players/coaches, etc read the boards. I get commenting on the Coaches and Players - just don't feel right about a FIRE COX title.
David Cox or David Cox Performance as a title would suffice imho.
Jim Baron 2.0 was not capitalized by the way
I hope we get to kill and lock this thread up too
viewtopic.php?t=6468
I find it interesting that the two most positive people in that thread (BlueMan and I) are the most negative people now...