Shinze88 wrote:What a fucking disgrace this post is, you really are a piece of shitRhody15 wrote:Fuck EC Matthews. He fucking SUCKS.
Takes two step back threes against Ryan fucking Fazekas.
Fucking pathetic.
And fuck you.RamFanCO19 wrote:HahahahahHAHAAHAHAHHAHA WHAT A BUNCH OF LOSERSSSSS YOU ALLL ARE
GO FRIARS - PC owns you losers
I mean, a few months sounds nice but I was murdered mercilessly for years about how I felt DH handled the offense and end games with X, with X and EC, and EC. Murdered. You all know who you are!!PlayMikeMotenMore wrote:I thinking I pulled a muscle patting myself on the back...after surviving a punch to the gut with another loss to PC. (Gosh, I cannot stand the Friahhs). I believe a few months ago...
The fact is Hurley's offenses have not improved. There is very little creativity and imagination. Score 60 points a game? Not going to win much that way. The team plays hard. However, I think most teams play hard. Do they play smart? Can they play defense without fouling? Do they do the little things? Can he and they make the right decisions at the right times? Do they have the fortitude to win a hostile environment?
Do I think there's talent? I sure do. Is it being utilized to its max? Is the coaching staff motivating, tweaking their ideas and system to accommodate that talent? Is the in-game coaching as good as you'd thought it be? Is complaining about officials by the coach and fans a distraction to what the real issues are? You be the judge.
.
To say their mental makeup, and that of the coach especially is "suspect"...is really giving them the benefit of the doubt...rambone 78 wrote:Rod, this team, other than a few players, has nowhere near the talent of the late 90's teams.....
Their mental makeup is very suspect, along with the coach's......
And to think, most on this board really hoped DH would stay when Rutgers came calling....what's the feeling now?
Nobody's going to want him.....
Agree...PC has it all over these guys.RamFanCO19 wrote:Hey guys just so you know 7 in a row hahahahahaha hahahahahah
They don't know what they're doing...and if you think EC "doesn't need to freekn sit"...I don't think you've been watching what everyone else has been watching. He's not adding ANY value right now...NONE. N-O-N-E. I really do think it might do him good to SIT and think about what he needs to do to warrant being out there and, instead of thinking about 'being EC' (whatever the bleep that used to be)...just be 'better than CT or SR..." that would be a great start.hrstrat57 wrote:EC doesn't need to freaking sit he needs a couple plays drawn up and practiced with picks that allow him to "attack the bucket" with that left hand. We also need plays to get Martin the ball in a position to score....
It's just like cfl had his own kid best shooter in the country and no plays to get him open. Will Daniels one of top 10 baseline players in the country. No baseline picks for him either. Motion, motion motion.
I can't understand why this is more of the same...infuriating!
So much talent on this team - running around on offense like a youth hoops team / wait no actually youth hoops teams run plays
I'm also when nuts when we threw the ball in play off the inbounds into the backcourt losing at least 4/5 seconds off the clock in the final minute. We got no plays to inbounds the freaking ball?
Get back to me when we know what we're doing....
As someone that I have a great deal of respect for has told me...he should just grab some old coach that has some plays in his head and offer him free beers to sit on the bench next to him during games....that would be a big improvement.Joe wrote:Dan Hurley needs to dedicate practices to working on OFFENSE
RanFanCO19,RamFanCO19 wrote:HahahahahHAHAAHAHAHHAHA WHAT A BUNCH OF LOSERSSSSS YOU ALLL ARE
GO FRIARS - PC owns you losers
Last game we couldn't stop a virtual 1 man show in Valpo's big man Peters, tonight Cartwright was like a 1 man show and had a career high night scoring, 4-5 on threes, game high 8 assists and only 1 turnover.URI2006_Andy wrote:1. Either CT or SR needs to be on the floor at all times defending the opposing team’s PG. JT can handle the ball on offense as he did in the second half of the Cincy game . Cartwright had a difficult time with CT on him tonight and had a cakewalk with JG on him. Plus having CT and/or SR in the game helps the offense because JT is able to defend an opponent's weaker guard and conserve some energy for offense.
2. Down late in the game, foul immediately. Not rocket science. Stop wasting time trying to get steals. 26 seconds left PC should be up 1 shooting pressure foul shots. Instead, 12 seconds wasted and an easy dunk.
3. Pick 7 guys to play and let them play so they can get into a rhythm. Constant subbing and trying to give your best players a break before a TV timeout has never worked dating back to Baron. Maybe the 7th guy changes game to game based on matchups so that 9 or 10 guys are used during the season but no need to play more than 7 in 1 game unless there is serious foul trouble.
Bingo.....game set match....dropping the mic....UCH21377 wrote:This team needs to be turned over to Terrell, Garrett, and Hass. EC and KI need to come off the bench, with Robinson. Start Akele and Thompson. That way we have some scoring punch off the bench. Hurley will never do it.
I insinuated that in my response BillyBoy. Go to the PC Board and he is making his normal comments. Still does not understand why he got banned from here by the Moderators. It may not be him, but if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck.......................Billyboy78 wrote:I guarantee that RamFan CO19 is Sean.
They have assisted on 46.7% of their made FGs, which is #279 in the country. They can hero ball lesser teams to death but you need 8-12 easy buckets per game off of assists against good teams. At least. That # goes back to 2002 and URI has never sniffed the top 100. You want a similarity between CFL and DH, that's it right there. And a huge light is shined on it at the end of games.Billyboy78 wrote:When you run a shitty offense, you get 6 assists and 9 turnovers. 6 assists is an unbelievable stat for a college basketball team.
What is the difference between "too much one on one" "too many forced shots" and "no offensive plays"?rambone 78 wrote:Few assists usually means too much one on one, and too many forced shots......
That's what passes for our half court "offense"...very offensive indeed......
It's easy for opponents to defend statues.......
The thing is, there's times when we move the ball pretty well...and then it stops cold, usually late in games.......what the hell are the coaches doing to change it?
83, you just summed up what I was going to post.Rhody83 wrote:I never thought URI was a top 25 this offseason. I was shocked when I first heard those rumblings.
They are not that talented (especially offensively). They were a bad team last year. Go check their record on the road.
I know EC was out and the excuse that Hassan was hurt. I didn't think EC would wave magic over the team.
I did think EC would be better than this for sure.
JT has improved and Hassan has delivered. That is it though. In their four competitive games they have played 1 really good half. That is it 1 out of 8. Because they aten't that good.
They don't have one pure outside shooter.
They don't have a player who is always better than his macth up.
They don't have a go to player on offense (JT is close). Not like Bullock was for PC down the stretch.
Their half court sets on offense are mostly just a weave. Poor coaching.
Their offensive possessions out of time outs are horrible.
Today they stood around on offense for the last 12 minutes.
There is a reason KI was on the bench at Memphis and Stan at IU. They can't shoot.
Rhody has average talent and average coaching. You should expect average results.
