2016-17 Bracketology
- RhowdyRam02
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10314
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 6599
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Assembly Call has been the most accurate. They have URI third out as of this morning
0 x
Take down the Robert Carothers banner and fix the concession stand lines
- Rhodymob05
- Tyson Wheeler
- Posts: 7424
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Rhode Island
- x 3986
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16414
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5245
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Lunardi will make last minute adjustments as he hears from people really close to the committee.....does it every year, so his picks are closely in line with what actually happens on SS......
As of this AM bracket matrix has us just 2 behind Ill. St. 59-57.....but K State is closing.....we REALLY need them to lose to Baylor in their 1st round game.....if they win that game they will jump us 100%.
And Ill. State will finally be out, for good.
As of this AM bracket matrix has us just 2 behind Ill. St. 59-57.....but K State is closing.....we REALLY need them to lose to Baylor in their 1st round game.....if they win that game they will jump us 100%.
And Ill. State will finally be out, for good.
Last edited by rambone 78 7 years ago, edited 2 times in total.
0 x
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
http://bracketmatrix.com/
Interesting times for a bunch of teams that are in must win situations
Clemson has to beat Duke today
Illinois State is seeded 8th by one Bracketologist and 9th by 2 others - don't know how they can have them that high
Interesting times for a bunch of teams that are in must win situations
Clemson has to beat Duke today
Illinois State is seeded 8th by one Bracketologist and 9th by 2 others - don't know how they can have them that high
0 x
- Rhodymob05
- Tyson Wheeler
- Posts: 7424
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Rhode Island
- x 3986
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Cal needs to F off too, they are least deserving of the bubble teams left in my opinion.
0 x
GO RAMS
-
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 16414
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 5245
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
ramster, there are always a couple of idiots out there.........
Would like to see X lose too, but not likely.
Would like to see X lose too, but not likely.
0 x
- Da_Process_Survivor
- Cuttino Mobley
- Posts: 1749
- Joined: 9 years ago
- Location: Las Vegas
- x 2181
- RhowdyRam02
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10314
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 6599
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Don't jinx us with that Tales From the Crypt piece of garbage!
0 x
Take down the Robert Carothers banner and fix the concession stand lines
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
I put together a cool spreadsheet at work yesterday that tracks all the bubble teams this week. Maybe I should know this but is there a way to share that here as a file? Or do I need to make an image of it and host it somewhere in order to get it on here?
0 x
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
You could put in a google doc and share that, just an optionTruePoint wrote:I put together a cool spreadsheet at work yesterday that tracks all the bubble teams this week. Maybe I should know this but is there a way to share that here as a file? Or do I need to make an image of it and host it somewhere in order to get it on here?
0 x
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Please don't legitimatize Lunardi. Not even in the top 20 of bracketologists.rambone 78 wrote:Lunardi will make last minute adjustments as he hears from people really close to the committee.....does it every year, so his picks are closely in line with what actually happens on SS......
As of this AM bracket matrix has us just 2 behind Ill. St. 59-57.....but K State is closing.....we REALLY need them to lose to Baylor in their 1st round game.....if they win that game they will jump us 100%.
And Ill. State will finally be out, for good.
3 x
"Every season, college basketball has one or two teams that rise from dormancy to relevancy, squads that make long-awaited charges at the NCAA Tournament and become really fun storylines along the way."
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
3rd time I've posted this....
Who declared lunardi the expert?
Serious question cause I sure missed it.....
Who? When? Why?
Coach I'm not seein it.....
Who declared lunardi the expert?
Serious question cause I sure missed it.....
Who? When? Why?
Coach I'm not seein it.....
2 x
We're gonna run the picket fence at "em.....now boys don't get caught watchin' the paint dry!
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Lunardi is ranked 22nd and Palm 61st. Let's stop quoting their brackets!
http://www.bracketmatrix.com/rankings.html
http://www.bracketmatrix.com/rankings.html
1 x
"Every season, college basketball has one or two teams that rise from dormancy to relevancy, squads that make long-awaited charges at the NCAA Tournament and become really fun storylines along the way."
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
What did you do? Cancel all meetings and conference calls to work on this spreadsheet? Hope your boss is not a Keaney Blue subscriberTruePoint wrote:I put together a cool spreadsheet at work yesterday that tracks all the bubble teams this week. Maybe I should know this but is there a way to share that here as a file? Or do I need to make an image of it and host it somewhere in order to get it on here?
0 x
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Ok, good point surf. But if I linked to it it wouldn't show up in the page on this site, right?
0 x
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
ramster wrote:What did you do? Cancel all meetings and conference calls to work on this spreadsheet? Hope your boss is not a Keaney Blue subscriberTruePoint wrote:I put together a cool spreadsheet at work yesterday that tracks all the bubble teams this week. Maybe I should know this but is there a way to share that here as a file? Or do I need to make an image of it and host it somewhere in order to get it on here?
Lunch is me-time
1 x
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
- RhowdyRam02
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10314
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 6599
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
He was one of, if not the first, to do it and he has the biggest platform, therefore he's considered the expert. Luckily we're able to track things now and know he's not the most accurate. Of course the most accurate has us in worse position, so...hrstrat57 wrote:3rd time I've posted this....
Who declared lunardi the expert?
Serious question cause I sure missed it.....
Who? When? Why?
Coach I'm not seein it.....
1 x
Take down the Robert Carothers banner and fix the concession stand lines
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Ahhh another guy created a job for himself based on BS...RhowdyRam02 wrote:He was one of, if not the first, to do it and he has the biggest platform, therefore he's considered the expert. Luckily we're able to track things now and know he's not the most accurate. Of course the most accurate has us in worse position, so...hrstrat57 wrote:3rd time I've posted this....
Who declared lunardi the expert?
Serious question cause I sure missed it.....
Who? When? Why?
Coach I'm not seein it.....
Nice
Thx RR
0 x
We're gonna run the picket fence at "em.....now boys don't get caught watchin' the paint dry!
- twisted3829
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 439
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
I trust the matrix the most and I also look at dancecard.unf.edu since it's not a person just formulas based on past data
0 x
NOT IN OUR HOUSE
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Interesting, they give us a 99.88% chance of a bid.twisted3829 wrote:I trust the matrix the most and I also look at dancecard.unf.edu since it's not a person just formulas based on past data
0 x
- Rhodymob05
- Tyson Wheeler
- Posts: 7424
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Rhode Island
- x 3986
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
I'd say that's pretty good ay.adam914 wrote:Interesting, they give us a 99.88% chance of a bid.twisted3829 wrote:I trust the matrix the most and I also look at dancecard.unf.edu since it's not a person just formulas based on past data
0 x
GO RAMS
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Bracketmatrix is updated. They finally have URI in and Ill St. out.
http://bracketmatrix.com/
http://bracketmatrix.com/
Last edited by RhodyNJ 7 years ago, edited 1 time in total.
3 x
- twisted3829
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 439
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Cuse is in even if they lose today. Virginia Tech is definitely a big one, if Wake wins I think they're probably going to get in as well.
0 x
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
I don't understand how Syracuse is a tournament team even if they WIN today. Just makes no sense to me. If they lose and still make it, it will be a mockery.
Last edited by TruePoint 7 years ago, edited 1 time in total.
1 x
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
- Seawrightspostgame
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4140
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 1563
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
I completely agree with this. I think the people thinking Cuse is in are out of their mind.TruePoint wrote:I don't understand how Syracuse is a tournament team even if they WIN today. Just makes no sense to me. If they lose and still make it, it will be a mockery.
1 x
I want to change my name to BlockIslandFerry
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Gotta be honest - looking at their resume it really isn't as impressive as those 6 top 50 wins would make you believe.josephski wrote:Cuse is in even if they lose today. Virginia Tech is definitely a big one, if Wake wins I think they're probably going to get in as well.
If they lost today to Miami:
18-14, RPI 85, SOS 52. - Bad RPI, high losses
They'd be 2-5 in their last 7.
They would be 2-11 in road and neutral games. Also have a loss to a very bad BC team on there.
They're certainly not guaranteed anything with a loss here.
2 x
If you say you’re a Rhody fan, I know you are my brother. For you have suffered as I have suffered.
Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
Give to Rhody's NIL
Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
Give to Rhody's NIL
- ElmCityRhody
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4408
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 2364
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Seawrightspostgame wrote:I completely agree with this. I think the people thinking Cuse is in are out of their mind.TruePoint wrote:I don't understand how Syracuse is a tournament team even if they WIN today. Just makes no sense to me. If they lose and still make it, it will be a mockery.
agree to this agreement !
anyways.. up 1 now..
lets hope miami can get this W
0 x
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
I was born in Syracuse, raised a Cuse fan and most my family still lives in that area so take that comment with a grain of saltBlue Man wrote:Gotta be honest - looking at their resume it really isn't as impressive as those 6 top 50 wins would make you believe.josephski wrote:Cuse is in even if they lose today. Virginia Tech is definitely a big one, if Wake wins I think they're probably going to get in as well.
If they lost today to Miami:
18-14, RPI 85, SOS 52. - Bad RPI, high losses
They'd be 2-5 in their last 7.
They would be 2-11 in road and neutral games. Also have a loss to a very bad BC team on there.
They're certainly not guaranteed anything with a loss here.
Obviously I'm hoping both teams make the tournament, I really don't care about the rest of the ACC so as long as Clemson and Wake lose Cuse shouldn't affect our chances. Not sure what I'll do if they both make the tourney and play each other...
1 x
- RhowdyRam02
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10314
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 6599
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Right, only 2 road and neutral wins with an RPI of 79 shouldn't get in. And I don't understand how anyone trying to project the bracket could have Syracuse and Illinois State in but URI out. Either the strength of your wins matter most and Syracuse and URI should be in or your metrics like RPI matter most and Illinois State and URI should be in.TruePoint wrote:I don't understand how Syracuse is a tournament team even if they WIN today. Just makes no sense to me. If they lose and still make it, it will be a mockery.
0 x
Take down the Robert Carothers banner and fix the concession stand lines
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Anyone in Worcester, MA planning on catching the game Friday at a bar??
0 x
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 9822
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 5649
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
I think in McNamara's last year there they were a bubble team with a 9-7 conference record and still didn't get in.
They are still susceptible to a "snub"
They didn't do well in the nonconference either and that does matter to the committee.
I think they pretty much are in though.
They are still susceptible to a "snub"
They didn't do well in the nonconference either and that does matter to the committee.
I think they pretty much are in though.
0 x
-
- Ernie Calverley
- Posts: 9822
- Joined: 9 years ago
- x 5649
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Fultz won't be playing USCTruePoint wrote:OK, so here is my tracker. Will update as results come in. We want to see this thing littered with red before we play on Friday. Today, go Va Tech, DePaul, Duke, Washington, Miami, Oregon St. and UVA! Fultz is not playing for Washington, so there goes my fantasy of future Celtic great Fultz knocking USC out of the tournament and opening a spot for Rhody.
He's injured.
0 x
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Lunardi was just on live during the Syracuse game and he said he would not drop them off even if they loss today. His reasoning was interesting, to say the least. "They were in this spot last year and lost and then went to the final four so i wouldnt drop them out". Must be nice to not have this year count towards anything just cause you are in the ACC
4 x
- RhowdyRam02
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10314
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 6599
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Good lord, if the committee uses that thought process then this whole thing is a joke.
2 x
Take down the Robert Carothers banner and fix the concession stand lines
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Lunardi also didn't have Syracuse in his end of the year bracket, so I think he's afraid of getting burned again.
1 x
- Seawrightspostgame
- Sly Williams
- Posts: 4140
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 1563
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
That BC loss is atrocious.
0 x
I want to change my name to BlockIslandFerry
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Why do I all of a sudden feel like some Jerry Mcnamara bullshit is about to go down
0 x
If you say you’re a Rhody fan, I know you are my brother. For you have suffered as I have suffered.
Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
Give to Rhody's NIL
Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
Give to Rhody's NIL
- twisted3829
- Carlton Owens
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 439
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Syracuse loses to Miami 62-57 (had to hold my breath at the end)
0 x
NOT IN OUR HOUSE
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
ohhhh reef???
0 x
If you say you’re a Rhody fan, I know you are my brother. For you have suffered as I have suffered.
Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
Give to Rhody's NIL
Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
Give to Rhody's NIL
- Rhodymob05
- Tyson Wheeler
- Posts: 7424
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Rhode Island
- x 3986
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
My god I've never had this much agita for a non URI game before. Go Canes
0 x
GO RAMS
- ATPTourFan
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 12095
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Wakefield, RI
- x 4791
- Contact:
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Just glad they lost so the esteemed Committee has to at least answer for whatever decision they make.
In other news, Cuse fails to win at the Carrier Dome.
RPI Wizard says they will have a 18-14 record with disgusting 85 RPI on Selection Sunday, yet they'll get in.
In other news, Cuse fails to win at the Carrier Dome.
RPI Wizard says they will have a 18-14 record with disgusting 85 RPI on Selection Sunday, yet they'll get in.
Last edited by ATPTourFan 7 years ago, edited 1 time in total.
2 x
Support Coach Miller & Rhody Basketball! Give to the Athletic Director's Fund
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Syracuse is 2-11 on the road/neutral.
I understand everyone in the media loves Syracuse but with an RPI of 80, which I'd say may even go down after today, coupled with the atrocious record away from Syracuse I just can't see them getting in.
I understand everyone in the media loves Syracuse but with an RPI of 80, which I'd say may even go down after today, coupled with the atrocious record away from Syracuse I just can't see them getting in.
1 x
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
The tournament committee wants competitive teams in the tournament. Anyone who has watched Syracuse play at least several times this year would know that they'd probably beat URI more often than not on a neutral court. I haven't seen it mentioned here lately but I think Davidson getting absolutely destroyed 2 years ago in the tournament hurt the A10 slightly. They won the league and had one of the worst losses among at large teams in recent history. Wasn't a good look for the a10 and I'm sure the tournament committee wants to avoid games like that one.adam914 wrote:Lunardi was just on live during the Syracuse game and he said he would not drop them off even if they loss today. His reasoning was interesting, to say the least. "They were in this spot last year and lost and then went to the final four so i wouldnt drop them out". Must be nice to not have this year count towards anything just cause you are in the ACC
1 x
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
On a neutral court? No. Maybe in the Carrier Dome but nowhere else.
2 x
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
That's what I said. I'm confused.PeterRamTime wrote:Fultz won't be playing USCTruePoint wrote:OK, so here is my tracker. Will update as results come in. We want to see this thing littered with red before we play on Friday. Today, go Va Tech, DePaul, Duke, Washington, Miami, Oregon St. and UVA! Fultz is not playing for Washington, so there goes my fantasy of future Celtic great Fultz knocking USC out of the tournament and opening a spot for Rhody.
He's injured.
1 x
"If you build it, they will come." --Us, circa 2011
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Committee will say 10-8 record in big bad ACC, win over Duke and xyz, played best ball towards end of the year.....really what they mean is Syracuse = $$$
1 x
Clapton is God
- RhowdyRam02
- Frank Keaney
- Posts: 10314
- Joined: 11 years ago
- x 6599
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Syracuse is 2-5 in their last 7, hardly playing their best ball at the end here. Yeah, they played tough teams, but there are tough teams in the tournament and they don't get to play in the Carrier Dome.
1 x
Take down the Robert Carothers banner and fix the concession stand lines
- Rhodymob05
- Tyson Wheeler
- Posts: 7424
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: Rhode Island
- x 3986
Re: 2016-17 Bracketology
Last season was last season, Lunardi shouldn't be under pressure to have Syracuse in just because they made a run in the tourney last year. THEY WERE A CINDERELLA TEAM, doesn't matter if you're Syracuse or George Mason, its March. Be consistent committee!
2 x
GO RAMS