Yep...or, as Rhody hoop fan would say, 'seems like only yesterday'Ramblinrose wrote:I don't see how PC being good helps URI at all, unless URI beats PC head to head. A rising tide doesn't lift all boats. Giants fan, your team hasn't made the playoffs in five years.
yep, fan of the gamePeterRamTime wrote:I'm rootin for joes. Go A-10 all the way
So perfect for the NCAA. They had some fun upsets in the early going, things to keep people watching with great underdog games, leading to a sweet 16 of P5 teams, a former national champion, and a team that has created its own rule with bracket busting.Obadiah wrote:Despite valiant efforts by SFA and UNI, it is interesting to note that all the teams in the Sweet Sixteen are from P5 conferences with the exceptions being Villanova and Gonzaga and both of these are programs with some heft and experience.
OK...agree. So why can't people leave it at that? Refs are human...calls are made and calls are missed...there has never been a perfectly officiated game.Seawrightspostgame wrote:I don't think there are cahoots. I think refs are human and do call some games inconsistently to the point that it has an absolute effect on the outcome.
Although Bill Walton came pretty close...PlayMikeMotenMore wrote:OK...agree. So why can't people leave it at that? Refs are human...calls are made and calls are missed...there has never been a perfectly officiated game.Seawrightspostgame wrote:I don't think there are cahoots. I think refs are human and do call some games inconsistently to the point that it has an absolute effect on the outcome.
Come to think of it...players are human...shots are made and shots are missed...there has never been a perfectly played game.
That's basketball. I don't know why people harp on imperfections. It's ALL part of the game.
Laettner against Kentucky I think made 20 out of 20 from the field and line and, of course, one of the biggest shots in NCAA history. That's pretty good. Refs are necessary but it does really stink that they have such an impact late. My biggest ref gripe is not when they miss something. That's human. It's when they sort of assume contact happened or the foul happened and it just never did. Who fouled Arthur Lee at the end of the Stanford game? Clay? That's so far from a foul but the ref just assumed he did because Lee spun a bit. Just be sure you see it. 100%. But refs do it all the time.Billyboy78 wrote:Although Bill Walton came pretty close...PlayMikeMotenMore wrote:OK...agree. So why can't people leave it at that? Refs are human...calls are made and calls are missed...there has never been a perfectly officiated game.Seawrightspostgame wrote:I don't think there are cahoots. I think refs are human and do call some games inconsistently to the point that it has an absolute effect on the outcome.
Come to think of it...players are human...shots are made and shots are missed...there has never been a perfectly played game.
That's basketball. I don't know why people harp on imperfections. It's ALL part of the game.
Amenadam914 wrote:This about sums up my feelings perfectly.TruePoint wrote:I honestly feel that if ISIS had a basketball team I would root for them against PC.
Makes sense, with the new rules he can get a better idea of where he'd go in the draft and, if he doesn't like what he hears, can still return to schoolBillyboy78 wrote:Don't know where to put this...
Providence PF Ben Bentil will declare for the NBA Draft, but not sign with an agent, a source told Scout. Leaves option open to return.
1:02pm - 23 Mar 16
As we know, a lot of teams draft on potential. He improved tons between his frosh and soph year, so a team that envisions the same type of progression might jump on him in the 1st round.rambone 78 wrote:Better move for us, if he goes.....
If he's projected 1st round, I think he goes.
I think Reggie Miller said during an NCAA telecast words to this effect: "I hate to say it like this (put it this way), but Bentil is NBA-ready."Billyboy78 wrote:As we know, a lot of teams draft on potential. He improved tons between his frosh and soph year, so a team that envisions the same type of progression might jump on him in the 1st round.rambone 78 wrote:Better move for us, if he goes.....
If he's projected 1st round, I think he goes.
rambone 78 wrote:TP, now that didn't hurt too much did it? Agreeing with me that is.
Actually I agree with your entire post too.
Weird.
So funny. I haven't thought of that show in, well....probably since it was on.bressler3south wrote:rambone 78 wrote:TP, now that didn't hurt too much did it? Agreeing with me that is.
Actually I agree with your entire post too.
Weird.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10hrOJkOxX0
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, life on KeaneyBlue..........
Styles make fights. Good nights and bad nights. I don't really believe in the transitive property in sports, so I don't think that means anything as far as the quality of VCU vis a vis A&M.Stop! Rammer Time wrote:Interesting how VCU played a much tighter game vs Oklahoma than A&M did ... something that likely very few people notice, but good for the A10.
Boo to Syracuse and Boeheim. I've been vehemently rooting against them.NYGFan_Section208 wrote:Go 'cuuuuuuse!
Orange!!!! WooooHoooooooooo!Stop! Rammer Time wrote:Boo to Syracuse and Boeheim. I've been vehemently rooting against them.NYGFan_Section208 wrote:Go 'cuuuuuuse!
