These tweets from the new random accounts are getting more cringy by the day.
Disagree. Do you follow any of PC twitter and the motley crew of posters who flood X? Lighten up. I’d rather see these than the 350th pot shot at Archie from Vault.
Just sit back and enjoy the show like Chris DiSano……
These tweets from the new random accounts are getting more cringy by the day.
Disagree. Do you follow any of PC twitter and the motley crew of posters who flood X? Lighten up. I’d rather see these than the 350th pot shot at Archie from Vault.
Just sit back and enjoy the show like Chris DiSano……
It’s very funny
the first rule about dog beach, is you don't talk about dog beach.
Disagree. Do you follow any of PC twitter and the motley crew of posters who flood X? Lighten up. I’d rather see these than the 350th pot shot at Archie from Vault.
Just sit back and enjoy the show like Chris DiSano……
It’s very funny
the first rule about dog beach, is you don't talk about dog beach.
Ok, I live on the other side of the bridges. What is dog beach?
Disagree. Do you follow any of PC twitter and the motley crew of posters who flood X? Lighten up. I’d rather see these than the 350th pot shot at Archie from Vault.
Just sit back and enjoy the show like Chris DiSano……
It’s very funny
the first rule about dog beach, is you don't talk about dog beach.
Lol so true. Dog beach used to be the best kept secret. Hidden gem. Now it's blown up to be so popular parking is restricted big time.
True southern Rhode Islanders know about dog beach
Oh, it is. No rest rooms, no parking((except maybe a dozen)ticketed cars, high tide little beach(climate change)way to many boats, drunk captains, tangled anchor lines, other than that, it’s OK
Just sit back and enjoy the show like Chris DiSano……
It’s very funny
the first rule about dog beach, is you don't talk about dog beach.
Lol so true. Dog beach used to be the best kept secret. Hidden gem. Now it's blown up to be so popular parking is restricted big time.
True southern Rhode Islanders know about dog beach
I've lived in southern RI for 62 years but don't know what it is. I have to cross 2 bridges to get there, I think. And I used to bring my daughter down that way when she was little to Scarborough, Narragansett and Misquamicut a lot.
section(105) wrote: ↑6 months ago
Oh, it is. No rest rooms, no parking((except maybe a dozen)ticketed cars, high tide little beach(climate change)way to many boats, drunk captains, tangled anchor lines, other than that, it’s OK
section(105) wrote: ↑6 months ago
Oh, it is. No rest rooms, no parking((except maybe a dozen)ticketed cars, high tide little beach(climate change)way to many boats, drunk captains, tangled anchor lines, other than that, it’s OK
Plus, seaweed, tons of gross seaweed
…..people urinating in the area, soiled diapers and trash in the Rosa Rugosa, some unleashed dogs run a muck hot Charcoal burried(sometimes in sand)…..other than that, can’t wait for the 4th!
the first rule about dog beach, is you don't talk about dog beach.
Lol so true. Dog beach used to be the best kept secret. Hidden gem. Now it's blown up to be so popular parking is restricted big time.
True southern Rhode Islanders know about dog beach
I've lived in southern RI for 62 years but don't know what it is. I have to cross 2 bridges to get there, I think. And I used to bring my daughter down that way when she was little to Scarborough, Narragansett and Misquamicut a lot.
Yeah it's a hidden beach down at the end of point Judith. Didn't really become a popular place until last 5 years.
“Sources have told ESPN that schools are anticipating a ceiling of nearly $20 million per year for athlete revenue share moving forward. (That figure for a revenue share is derived from a formula that's expected to be, per sources, 22% of a revenue metric that's still being discussed, which is set to be based on various revenue buckets. It would be up to the schools to share that much.)”
“Sources have told ESPN that schools are anticipating a ceiling of nearly $20 million per year for athlete revenue share moving forward. (That figure for a revenue share is derived from a formula that's expected to be, per sources, 22% of a revenue metric that's still being discussed, which is set to be based on various revenue buckets. It would be up to the schools to share that much.)”
Important distinction here...this lawsuit and settlement will be about real NIL money, players actually getting paid, BY THE ENTITIES THAT ARE MAKING MONEY OFF THEIR NAME, IMAGE, and/or LIKENESS.... instead of this 'new fan-funded pie' creation aka:
ETA:
In juxtapositiomn almost too good to be true...next story:
Kirby Smart has received a new 10-year, $130 million deal that was approved by university officials Thursday in its annual athletics board of directors meeting.
LOL...where did that $130M come from? And, how much of that pot of gold are the players getting now?
(Answer = "less than 'some'", but hey, that's just the way it is, so pony up, amigos)
“Sources have told ESPN that schools are anticipating a ceiling of nearly $20 million per year for athlete revenue share moving forward. (That figure for a revenue share is derived from a formula that's expected to be, per sources, 22% of a revenue metric that's still being discussed, which is set to be based on various revenue buckets. It would be up to the schools to share that much.)”
Important distinction here...this lawsuit and settlement will be about real NIL money, players actually getting paid, BY THE ENTITIES THAT ARE MAKING MONEY OFF THEIR NAME, IMAGE, and/or LIKENESS.... instead of this 'new fan-funded pie' creation aka:
ETA:
In juxtapositiomn almost too good to be true...next story:
Kirby Smart has received a new 10-year, $130 million deal that was approved by university officials Thursday in its annual athletics board of directors meeting.
LOL...where did that $130M come from? And, how much of that pot of gold are the players getting now?
(Answer = "less than 'some'", but hey, that's just the way it is, so pony up, amigos)
"Our leverage is a big cannonball rolling down a hill and picking up speed," Berman said. "The longer they wait, the more they're going to have to pay. It's that simple."
"They've got stuff on paper," said an industry source. "This is not just lawyers and commissioners meeting and having a cocktail. This snowball is moving downhill. The horizon on this is about a month."
ElmCityRhody wrote: ↑5 months ago
I MISS THE GOOD OLE DAYS
let's get rid of this BULLSHIT they call "NIL" and bring back the good ole days
btw.. how gay is NIL (not that there is anything wrong with that) .. name, image, likeness.. more like gay gay gay
bring back the good ole days and let's lace them up !
Viewed this message just for the hell of it.
Nice to see you're still a clown.,
You are a joke ( and probably alcoholic) human being who has way too much time on their hands and spews constant bullshit and asinine things.
Three straight posts talking to yourself on a message board because nobody can stand talking to you in person or online.
Take a hike buddy, NOBODY here will miss you.
Who the feck are you? The Keaney Blue anti-first amendment poster? Who gives a feck what people post. I see it rubs you wrong. Good.
Correct, ECR repeating himself a MILLION times about how he’s anti NIL, but others should donate, posting stupid ass irrelevant music videos does rub me the wrong way.
A self admitted troll, with no relevant opinions or basketball knowledge and just talks to himself repeatedly on here.
Last edited by Rhody155 months ago, edited 2 times in total.
ElmCityRhody wrote: ↑5 months ago
I MISS THE GOOD OLE DAYS
let's get rid of this BULLSHIT they call "NIL" and bring back the good ole days
btw.. how gay is NIL (not that there is anything wrong with that) .. name, image, likeness.. more like gay gay gay
bring back the good ole days and let's lace them up !
Viewed this message just for the hell of it.
Nice to see you're still a clown.,
You are a joke ( and probably alcoholic) human being who has way too much time on their hands and spews constant bullshit and asinine things.
Three straight posts talking to yourself on a message board because nobody can stand talking to you in person or online.
Take a hike buddy, NOBODY here will miss you.
Didn’t everyone have to listen to you talk about Jermaine Harris for 3 years? I think if I remember ECR has a young kid/family which takes up time and I’m assuming since you post about 12-15 times a day you don’t have much going on with your life. If you met him in person you probably wouldn’t have the guts to say this to his face.
ElmCityRhody wrote: ↑5 months ago
I MISS THE GOOD OLE DAYS
let's get rid of this BULLSHIT they call "NIL" and bring back the good ole days
btw.. how gay is NIL (not that there is anything wrong with that) .. name, image, likeness.. more like gay gay gay
bring back the good ole days and let's lace them up !
Viewed this message just for the hell of it.
Nice to see you're still a clown.,
You are a joke ( and probably alcoholic) human being who has way too much time on their hands and spews constant bullshit and asinine things.
Three straight posts talking to yourself on a message board because nobody can stand talking to you in person or online.
Take a hike buddy, NOBODY here will miss you.
Didn’t everyone have to listen to you talk about Jermaine Harris for 3 years? I think if I remember ECR has a young kid/family which takes up time and I’m assuming since you post about 12-15 times a day you don’t have much going on with your life. If you met him in person you probably wouldn’t have the guts to say this to his face.
Yes, I talked about a players performance on the court from our team, not posting random music videos and irrelevant rants.
"Honestly, my advice to the young guy; unless you're a surefire, one-and-done, I'd probably go low-major or mid-major for a year because you're not, realistically, going to play... They're not going to pay them that money to sit them on the bench. As a freshman, you gotta realize that....Go mid-major, average 15 points, 5 rebounds and go get your two million next year and hopefully you have a great career and you don't have to stress financially."
Honestly I think schools like us should embrace that mentality. Come to Rhody, showcase what you can do for a couple years, lead us to the tournament and then go get paid somewhere if that's what you want to do (or maybe you even end up loving it and stay). Just like up and coming coaches have always done. Then replace those guys with the next batch of players that want to take us to the tourney and prove themselves. We need to find ways to make the current system work for us rather then the "poor us" victim mentality.
The one huge caveat with that whole story though is that the $2 million number is such an outlier. There will be very few players getting anywhere close to that number. I do appreciate that they talked about some players who said it's not always about the money to. Good to keep in mind.
adam914 wrote: ↑5 months ago
Honestly I think schools like us should embrace that mentality. Come to Rhody, showcase what you can do for a couple years, lead us to the tournament and then go get paid somewhere if that's what you want to do (or maybe you even end up loving it and stay). Just like up and coming coaches have always done. Then replace those guys with the next batch of players that want to take us to the tourney and prove themselves. We need to find ways to make the current system work for us rather then the "poor us" victim mentality.
The one huge caveat with that whole story though is that the $2 million number is such an outlier. There will be very few players getting anywhere close to that number. I do appreciate that they talked about some players who said it's not always about the money to. Good to keep in mind.
Also, maybe we could get rid of the "if you are anti-collective, you are a sucky fan" mentality while we're at it?
adam914 wrote: ↑5 months ago
Honestly I think schools like us should embrace that mentality. Come to Rhody, showcase what you can do for a couple years, lead us to the tournament and then go get paid somewhere if that's what you want to do (or maybe you even end up loving it and stay). Just like up and coming coaches have always done. Then replace those guys with the next batch of players that want to take us to the tourney and prove themselves. We need to find ways to make the current system work for us rather then the "poor us" victim mentality.
The one huge caveat with that whole story though is that the $2 million number is such an outlier. There will be very few players getting anywhere close to that number. I do appreciate that they talked about some players who said it's not always about the money to. Good to keep in mind.
Also, maybe we could get rid of the "if you are anti-collective, you are a sucky fan" mentality while we're at it?
I don't recall ever saying that if you are anti-collective, you are a sucky fan. So no need to get rid of a mentality that I don't hold in the first place.
adam914 wrote: ↑5 months ago
Honestly I think schools like us should embrace that mentality. Come to Rhody, showcase what you can do for a couple years, lead us to the tournament and then go get paid somewhere if that's what you want to do (or maybe you even end up loving it and stay). Just like up and coming coaches have always done. Then replace those guys with the next batch of players that want to take us to the tourney and prove themselves. We need to find ways to make the current system work for us rather then the "poor us" victim mentality.
The one huge caveat with that whole story though is that the $2 million number is such an outlier. There will be very few players getting anywhere close to that number. I do appreciate that they talked about some players who said it's not always about the money to. Good to keep in mind.
Also, maybe we could get rid of the "if you are anti-collective, you are a sucky fan" mentality while we're at it?
I don't recall ever saying that if you are anti-collective, you are a sucky fan. So no need to get rid of a mentality that I don't hold in the first place.
Sorry, I was not referring to you...I know you haven't. I didn't think you had a "poor us" mentality either...jus' sayin' both of those are 'out there" and neither is particularly useful.
adam914 wrote: ↑5 months ago
Honestly I think schools like us should embrace that mentality. Come to Rhody, showcase what you can do for a couple years, lead us to the tournament and then go get paid somewhere if that's what you want to do (or maybe you even end up loving it and stay). Just like up and coming coaches have always done. Then replace those guys with the next batch of players that want to take us to the tourney and prove themselves. We need to find ways to make the current system work for us rather then the "poor us" victim mentality.
The one huge caveat with that whole story though is that the $2 million number is such an outlier. There will be very few players getting anywhere close to that number. I do appreciate that they talked about some players who said it's not always about the money to. Good to keep in mind.
Adam, I appreciate your line of thinking.
If the power programs zig then, we (non-power programs) consider zagging or a combo of zagging and zigging instead of copying them and trying to battle them dollar for dollar. Adapt and overcome.
That said, I don’t know how successful and how sustainable zagging or zig/zag strategies will be regarding obtaining NCAAT wins. The strategy could get us to the NCAAT but result in one and done whereas I would like to see NCAAT run to a Sweet 16 or Elite 8 before my window here closes.
All this zigging and zagging is making me dizzy. Ooph.
Someone who openly despises NIL and refuses to donate isn't necessarily a bad fan, but their negative opinions are counterproductive and to some extent I think you lose ability to complain about recruiting if you could help support NIL and are choosing not to.
adam914 wrote: ↑5 months ago
Honestly I think schools like us should embrace that mentality. Come to Rhody, showcase what you can do for a couple years, lead us to the tournament and then go get paid somewhere if that's what you want to do (or maybe you even end up loving it and stay). Just like up and coming coaches have always done. Then replace those guys with the next batch of players that want to take us to the tourney and prove themselves. We need to find ways to make the current system work for us rather then the "poor us" victim mentality.
The one huge caveat with that whole story though is that the $2 million number is such an outlier. There will be very few players getting anywhere close to that number. I do appreciate that they talked about some players who said it's not always about the money to. Good to keep in mind.
adam914 wrote: ↑5 months ago
Honestly I think schools like us should embrace that mentality. Come to Rhody, showcase what you can do for a couple years, lead us to the tournament and then go get paid somewhere if that's what you want to do (or maybe you even end up loving it and stay). Just like up and coming coaches have always done. Then replace those guys with the next batch of players that want to take us to the tourney and prove themselves. We need to find ways to make the current system work for us rather then the "poor us" victim mentality.
The one huge caveat with that whole story though is that the $2 million number is such an outlier. There will be very few players getting anywhere close to that number. I do appreciate that they talked about some players who said it's not always about the money to. Good to keep in mind.
hooray! We're single A basketball.
Not even close. There are a whole bunch of reasons why it's nothing like single A basketball. But even if you want to view it that way, our options are basically either to cry about it, take our ball and go home and decide to just finish our slide in to irrelevance...or we can find a way to make it work for us and become a top tier mid-major program. Which has always been the goal for us anyway. I hope the people in charge of our program choose the second option.
adam914 wrote: ↑5 months ago
Honestly I think schools like us should embrace that mentality. Come to Rhody, showcase what you can do for a couple years, lead us to the tournament and then go get paid somewhere if that's what you want to do (or maybe you even end up loving it and stay). Just like up and coming coaches have always done. Then replace those guys with the next batch of players that want to take us to the tourney and prove themselves. We need to find ways to make the current system work for us rather then the "poor us" victim mentality.
The one huge caveat with that whole story though is that the $2 million number is such an outlier. There will be very few players getting anywhere close to that number. I do appreciate that they talked about some players who said it's not always about the money to. Good to keep in mind.
Adam, I appreciate your line of thinking.
If the power programs zig then, we (non-power programs) consider zagging or a combo of zagging and zigging instead of copying them and trying to battle them dollar for dollar. Adapt and overcome.
That said, I don’t know how successful and how sustainable zagging or zig/zag strategies will be regarding obtaining NCAAT wins. The strategy could get us to the NCAAT but result in one and done whereas I would like to see NCAAT run to a Sweet 16 or Elite 8 before my window here closes.
All this zigging and zagging is making me dizzy. Ooph.
Good discussion.
I agree Jdrums, we'd all love to get a nice deep tourney run, hell I'd even take a one and done at this point.
adam914 wrote: ↑5 months ago
Honestly I think schools like us should embrace that mentality. Come to Rhody, showcase what you can do for a couple years, lead us to the tournament and then go get paid somewhere if that's what you want to do (or maybe you even end up loving it and stay). Just like up and coming coaches have always done. Then replace those guys with the next batch of players that want to take us to the tourney and prove themselves. We need to find ways to make the current system work for us rather then the "poor us" victim mentality.
The one huge caveat with that whole story though is that the $2 million number is such an outlier. There will be very few players getting anywhere close to that number. I do appreciate that they talked about some players who said it's not always about the money to. Good to keep in mind.
hooray! We're single A basketball.
Not even close. There are a whole bunch of reasons why it's nothing like single A basketball. But even if you want to view it that way, our options are basically either to cry about it, take our ball and go home and decide to just finish our slide in to irrelevance...or we can find a way to make it work for us and become a top tier mid-major program. Which has always been the goal for us anyway. I hope the people in charge of our program choose the second option.